Updated 1 hour ago

Why Apple is great at interfaces when others are not

Opinion: the much underappreciated principle of pleasure

November 17th 2008 | Tell us what you think [ 2 comments ]

why-the-iphone-is-fun

Absence of pain isn't the same as pleasure

I was re-reading Insanely Great, by Steven Levy, the story of how the Macintosh came to be, and I was struck by one paragraph in particular. It was describing how the general look and feel of the original Mac interface was decided upon.

Rather than survey a bunch of users on every decision, the Mac team decided each issue among themselves, invariably going for the option that might amuse a user the most, that would give a user the most pleasure, and therefore imbue the Mac with personality.

That Apple thinking is still apparent: it's why the Mac metaphorically shakes its head at you when you get a password wrong. Similarly it's why the iPhone's icons wobble when you want to uninstall something.

Did anyone at Microsoft think of pleasure when designing Vista's awful UAC? Did anyone at Virgin (well, NTL really) think of pleasure when designing the clunky interface of the V+ box compared to the elegant simplicity of Sky+? Did anyone at anywhere think about pleasure when designing old mobile phone interfaces, a kludge of menus, scrolling, button pressing and nested icons? No wonder Nokia decided to start again.

It is not just enough to make using something easy. Windows does that, more or less. When it comes to deciding what choices to make, it helps that a team has a supremely clear vision of the role the technology is going to play in the lives of its users, as the original Mac team did, as I suspect, the iPhone team does today, and to be fair to Microsoft, the Surface team has.

Fun matters because it creates a legion of advocates for a technology that slightly duller products do not.

One can now see elements of the iPhone's touchscreen interface appearing in handsets from other manufacturers, like the Samsung Pixon, just as we once saw the influence of the Mac on Windows, but it's one thing to be, uh, "creatively inspired" by what other companies are doing, it's quite another to have a philosophy that enables you to do it first.

Comment on this article

Your comments (2) Click to add a new comment

tomankcorn


July 10th 2010

2. yeah Even with phones mac is not the best even thought people rave about the iphone UI HTC's is much nicer.

Alert a moderator

nobody158


February 9th 2010

1. hmm i disagree i hate the mac interface i use it often but they do everything horribly... i am not saying that windows is good... or even better linix has by far the best interfaces even that isn't really that good... i think we need a new interface that will make all the others unthinkable to use... it needs to be simple enough for a new user but powerful enough to do whatever you would like, but neither of the major companies are comining out with an interface that will do this so it is up to the linux supporters to come out with something that will best the better interfaces such as gnome and kde

Alert a moderator

Tell us what you think

You need to Log in or register to post comments

By submitting this form you agree to our Terms of Use and so are legally responsible for anything you submit. DO NOT submit anything which may violate the Terms of Use or another person's rights including copyrighted or offensive materials.