Updated 17 minutes ago

12814 products + 13850 members

PlayStation 4 - everything you need to know about the PS4

How the PS4 is shaping up to be the next must-own console

September 12th 2008 | Tell us what you think [ 35 comments ]

sony-hq

How is the PS4 shaping up behind the closed doors at Sony?

<>

If Microsoft is secretly readying its next Xbox to succeed the Xbox 360, then surely Sony must be working on a PlayStation 4?

Speculation is rife that the next console battle will be fought around 2011-2012. This is when Crytek's CEO Cevat Yerli and industry analyst Colin Sebastian believe that a potential Xbox 720 and PS4 could appear.

Recycling PS3 for PS4

To imagine what a PS4 might be capable of we should look at what the current PS3 doesn't have or doesn't do well. For starters, Sony will need to closely integrate the hardware and software development for its next console.

According to SCEA's CEO Jack Tretton: "The hardware guys developed the [PlayStation 3] fairly independently, then dumped it onto the software guy's lap, effectively saying 'do something with it.'"

Considering that Sony spent around $3 billion developing the PS3, it seems likely that it will use an improved version of the Cell processor for a PS4. IBM has already released an improved version of the Cell for its blade servers. The PowerXCell 8i is a 65nm chip, with support for 32GB of DDR2 memory and eight fully-functional SPEs (compared to seven on the PS3).

The advantage of recycling the Cell is that Sony could retain a familiar development environment and use existing code libraries. The modular design of the Cell architecture could also allow extra Synergistic Processing Elements (SPEs) to be added to future chips. Twenty or more SPEs might be possible on a single 32nm Cell processor.

And if increasing the on-chip SPEs isn't an option in the proposed 2011-2012 time frame, then a PS4 could incorporate multiple Cell chips. IBM's Cell roadmap includes a PowerXCell 32iv, which appears to feature four PPEs (Power Processor Elements) and 32 SPEs, ie four Cell chips running in parallel.

Inside the PlayStation 4

If the PS4 is a revamp of the PS3, we're likely to see some obvious technology upgrades – 802.11n to replace the existing 802.11b/g chipset; an external power supply (to reduce the size of the box and to improve cooling); a massive hard disk; new graphics processor and an increase in the onboard memory.

The memory architecture in the PS3 splits 512MB equally between graphics and application use and it's been suggested that this limits developer freedom. You'd expect the PS4 to address this issue, giving developers more dedicated memory in which to load game levels. Although it's worth pointing out that the PS3 (and any future Cell-based consoles) can use the SPEs for maths-intensive tasks like physics.

New graphics processor

What about a replacement for the PS3's NVIDIA-built RSX graphics processor? We've already speculated that Microsoft could use Intel's general purpose Larrabee chip in its next Xbox to handle real-time physics and AI. Rumours also suggest that Intel is pimping Larrabee to Sony for the PS4.

Like any Xbox 360 replacement, the PS4 is also going to have a much bigger hard disk. This will be in readiness for a wealth of downloadable content that will include games, demos, music, movies and TV shows. A terabyte HDD isn't out of the question. And in a world that will increasingly be looking to online services for content, does any PlayStation 4 still need a Blu-ray drive?

A PS4 without Blu-ray?

While the PS3 was instrumental in helping Blu-ray beat off HD DVD, there's a strong argument for dropping an optical drive from the PS4 altogether. Console owners are already downloading gigabytes-worth of game demos, video trailers, full-length movies and TV shows. With a giant hard disk in the PS4, games could simply be piped straight to the console on release day; long install/level load times would be eliminated.

Along with the Cell processor, the Blu-ray drive is one of the PS3's most expensive components. The PS3's high price has forced it into third place behind the Nintendo Wii and Xbox 360. Sony will be keen not to price itself out of the next console battle.

As Acclaim boss Dave Perry recently claimed: "Because of the cost of making the PlayStation 3 and because they sold it at a loss, Sony basically has pretty much no chance of making money on the PS3, because it's lost more money than they made during the entire peak of the PlayStation 2 – it's not going to happen again for Sony."

Sony can't simply slash its prices like Microsoft has recently. And Blu-ray is partly to blame. Billy Pidgeon, an analyst at market researcher IDC points out: "Blu-ray licensees would be threatened by pricing the PS3 below stand-alone Blu-ray players. The PS3 is a bit challenged on that side."

Chasing the dream of a digital hub

Do consumers really want a PlayStation 4 that does everything? Sony's next console needs to be a machine that plays the best games. Just like the PS2 did. The PS4 could go one of two ways – a premium all-in-one box that offers Blu-ray, integrated playTV and a much larger hard disk; or a pure games machine, stripped of its expensive technology in favour of mass market appeal?

Whatever the PS4 looks like, the final question to be asked is: when will it launch? Sony's Kaz Hirai has already given us a hint: "If you look at the history of the way we've managed our console business," he said, "we always try to hit a 10-year life cycle "

That might put any PS4 launch back to 2016. But when you consider that the PS2 is still chugging along in the shadow of the PS3, a PS4 could easily sit alongside and overlap the existence of the PS3.

What do you want to see in the PS4? Let us know in the comments
 

Your comments (35) Click to add a new comment

smackgamer


Saturday at 14:40 GMT

35. One great addition would be the introduction of and intergrated UMD port,it is a real dissapointment not to be able to play any PSP games. Also i honestly believe the next playstation will (or at least should) have a word processor and computer capabilities, i would'nt have had to buy a computer then!

Alert a moderator

queenbe


September 21st

34. i think the playstation needs to think about the games when you buy games for example rock band and acdc they should be able to be linked instead of having to stick in each game that is what the hard drive is for i would think that is just a little thing they should think about

Alert a moderator

pkbooya


September 6th

33. How would i be able to download games if i don't have internet access?

Alert a moderator

harrison94


September 5th

32. I just made this account to post a comment, i dont know about other people but im a 17 year old kid who can't afford all of these bluetooth accesories and stuff like that, So Sony should definitly make an input so that you can use a computer mic, non-Usb or usb so we can chat online. Also the ONLINE needs to be much better, for communication etc. Hopes this helps!

Alert a moderator

tflournoy95


August 27th

31. definently needs an optical drive. i 14 and i dont have a credit card to buy a game. i need to be able to go to the store and buy a new game with cash. i think other people probably feel that way too. if blu ray is what makes it soooooooo expencive use hd dvd. by the time this comes out im sure blu ray will be the same price dvd is now anyway. as for the hub thing i would definently buy that. if they will lose money off of it like they did on ps3 then make two different systems. i would buy both of them. definetly redo the online. i would like to see it free but if it was as good as xbox live i would gladly pay $50 a year. more games too. its almost worth it ot have an xbox just to play games that didnt come out on ps3.i dont want to see halo though. halo sucks ***. i dont want to talk about more advanced graphics and stuff like that because it will obviosly be better than it is now. 1 tb hdd seems a little big to me but if they can do that and make it cheap then go for it. i dont want to pay 600 dollars for my ps4 like i did for my ps3. as for backwards compatibility i got they ps3 when it just came out so i havent had any problems. the fact that they got rid of it was stupid but they werent making money so i understand.

Alert a moderator

bakedgoodies


August 26th

30. You're totally right, neotechni. If they removed Bluray they would lower their sales. I know so many people who buy PS3 for just that reason - most do not even play the games. I heard from http://sonyps4.com that only 2 games in the history of PlayStation have used the complete disc space, so they don't need the space removing Bluray would offer. I hope they keep it, I would rather buy a game console than a Bluray player anyday.

Alert a moderator

Tell us what you think

You need to Log in or register to post comments

By submitting this form you agree to our Terms of Use and so are legally responsible for anything you submit. DO NOT submit anything which may violate the Terms of Use or another person's rights including copyrighted or offensive materials.