Ask any console gamer, and they’ll likely tell you about the perennial rivalry between the Xbox One X and PS4 Pro. However, PC gamers have their own eternal feud, albeit without the headlines: Nvidia vs AMD. Although you may have never heard about it before, the sheer amount of innovation and competition that has sprung forth from this tech feud is nothing short of amazing.
Still, if you’re not willing to pledge loyalty to one of these tech behemoths, it can be hard to decide what the best graphics card for your needs is. Don’t worry though, we here at TechRadar have decided to sit down and figure out once and for all the true winner in the battle of Nvidia vs AMD. (Spoiler: it never ends)
In 2018, Nvidia VS AMD is still a major battle. Nearly two years after the release of Nvidia’s GTX 10 series, we just finally saw Nvidia announce the Turing-powered GeForce RTX 2080. This new powerhouse of a card will arrive in stores on September 20, alongside the RTX 2080 Ti, with the RTX 2070 following at a later date. We haven’t had a chance to test these cards yet, but you can be sure we’ll update this article the second we get our hands on these cards – they’re supposedly extremely powerful.
Over on the red team, AMD launched AMD Vega back in 2017. And, while it has launched a new 7nm Radeon Instinct GPU at Computex 2018, this isn’t a consumer model. So, with AMD Navi likely launching in 2019 or later, we’re not sure how AMD plans to compete with Nvidia Turing in the near future.
No matter how you look at it, neither Nvidia or AMD graphics cards are going away any time soon, so that’s why we created this guide – to dive in and figure out exactly how they differ. From their exclusive features to price to performance ratio, even down to their drivers, and you can’t forget all of those pesky exclusivity deals, either.
Anyone who browses Reddit or comment sections on tech websites will tell you that AMD is widely known for its affordability, and Nvidia for its high-end performance and high prices. But, are they actually right?
Well, there are plenty of benchmarks that pretty convincingly tell us that the AMD Radeon RX Vega 56, which is available for around $400 (about £284, AU$500) MSRP, is a better performer than the $650 (about £549, AU$799) Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070. When you factor in the effect that cryptocurrency mining has on the prices, Nvidia actually has a pretty massive advantage from a pricing perspective.
However, even though cryptocurrency isn’t really an issue anymore, the new graphics cards that Nvidia just announced are priced extremely high.
The Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Ti is listed at $1,199 (£1,099, AU$1,899), which is almost twice the price of the last-generation GTX 1080 Ti. This price bump continues down the line, with the RTX 2080 at $799 (£749, AU$1,199) and the RTX 2070 at $599 (£569, AU$899).
During the reveal keynote, Nvidia claimed that they would start at lower prices, for instance, the 2080 Ti should be starting at $999 (about £760, AU$1,385) – but we haven’t seen any cards offered at these prices. We’ll likely see these lower-priced units launch in a few months, if they ever launch at all.
Right now, if you’re trying to save some cash, you’re probably better off picking up either a last-generation Nvidia card or an AMD Vega or Radeon RX 500 series card – as the prices between the two are still pretty comparable, as is the power. Right now you can find an AMD RX Vega 64 for around $599 (£550, AU$730), about the same price as a GTX 1080.
At the end of the day, the better price is going to depend on where you’re lucky enough to find a discount.
When you’re trying to build a PC that’s more powerful than your arch-enemy’s, buying a graphics card isn’t a matter of price but performance. Packing the best performance for the lowest cost is the arguably the most pertinent factor in driving GPU sales.
Right now, we’re waiting to get our hands on the RTX 2080 Ti and the rest of the Nvidia Turing lineup, with GDDR6 memory and high-end Tensor and RT cores that should improve performance through the use of AI. We’re going to be seeing a major upset in the performance war of Nvidia vs AMD, and we’ll update this section once we’ve done some hardcore benchmarking.
And, even though AMD used to be praised for being the clear champions of value, Nvidia are the clear winners when it comes to price-to-performance ratio in 2018. And as further proof that Nvidia is killing the game right now: AMD hasn’t even produced a true contender to the GTX 1080 Ti, and Nvidia is coming out with the RTX 2080 which will pull even further ahead of the red team’s offerings.
To be fair, Vega has only been available for a few months now, and there was no GTX 1080 Ti equivalent at Pascal’s launch either. Still, the GTX 1080 shows the RX Vega 64 up in several different areas, such as multi-rendering and NBody calculation, whereas the RX Vega 64 is better at rendering texture details and complex shading.
In other words, AMD and Nvidia are so close at this point that which is better is more of a matter of what games you play and at what resolution. As we reported back in October, the Vega 64 is a better match for Forza Motorsport 7 at 1080p. At the same time, Nvidia’s flagship GPU managed the frame rate advantage in 4K.
This trend continues down the list of cheaper graphics cards from AMD and Nvidia, including the RX Vega 56, which sees higher frame rates than the GTX 1070 Founders Edition in DirectX 12-heavy games like Rise of the Tomb Raider and Deus Ex: Mankind Divided (91 fps vs 89 fps and 40 fps vs 31 fps, respectively), according to PCGamesN.
Throw a Grand Theft Auto V into the mix, however, and we’re talking 64 fps on the RX Vega 56 vs 79 fps from the GTX 1070.
Software, drivers and features
One key draw to using Nvidia hardware over AMD is the Green Team’s GeForce Experience software.
Because it delivers driver updates and optimizes games in addition to letting you broadcast gameplay and capture screenshots as well as videos directly from its easy-to-use interface, Nvidia GeForce Experience is posited as the one PC gaming application to rule them all.
Meanwhile, AMD’s newly announced Radeon Software Adrenalin Edition aims to overtake Nvidia’s solution.. Previously known as Crimson ReLive, the latest re-skinned update of AMD’s graphics application is stacked with all of the features you’ve grown accustomed to since the UI was massively overhauled back in July, but with the benefit of more consistent updates driver updates to account for every major game release.
As of December 2016, you could already livestream via Radeon Crimson ReLive, but now you can take safety measures to ensure maximum power efficiency while you’re gaming. That includes the ability to underclock memory frequencies, cap frame rates on a hardware level and enable “Enhanced Sync” to decrease frame stutter while it simultaneously combats screen tearing.
Still, GeForce Experience has the game optimization features we’re all crazy for. So when you don’t know what settings are best for your computer in The Witcher 3, Nvidia takes care of the heavy lifting for you.
AMD users can download and install Raptr’s Gaming Evolved tool to optimize their gaming experience. However, the add-on is less than ideal considering its biggest rival’s audience can accomplish nearly everything from within GeForce Experience. That includes using Nvidia Ansel to take way cool in-game photos at resolutions exceeding 63K (16 times that of which a 4K monitor can display).
Nvidia also has a leg up when it comes to streaming games whether it’s to another gaming PC with at least a Maxwell-based GPU, as well as the company’s self-made tablets and set-top box. Not to mention, Nvidia also has a cloud-based gaming service call GeForce Now available to Windows 10 and MacOS users.
It was once rumored that AMD and Nvidia were enacting shady tactics, “paying off” game developers to show preferential treatment towards one or the other. Were this the case, it would certainly explain why certain games run better using GeForce graphics than Radeon and vice versa.
Fortunately, besides new technologies like ray tracing and deep learning super-sampling in the new Nvidia Turing cards, we don’t see these concerns from PC gamers as much anymore – but they still exist.
Following its Capsaicin & Cream livestream event at GDC 2017, we spoke with AMD its to discuss its strategy in contending with Nvidia. The news that the company would partner with Bethesda Softworks to optimize its games for Radeon, Ryzen or both was worrying to say the least. And it still is.
At the time, the potential for games operating more smoothly on AMD systems meant that Nvidia could fight back by partnering with an equally large publisher. Although the latter maneuver hasn’t happened yet, early Wolfenstein II performance comparisons, such as this one from TechEpiphany on YouTube have exhibited better performance and lower temps coming from the AMD Radeon RX 64 when pitted against Nvidia’s GeForce GTX 1080.
We’re not saying there’s a bias towards AMD in Bethesda’s technical design decisions, however we aren’t ready to take off our tin foil hats quite yet either.
Of course, Bethesda is hardly the only company to show favoritism to either team red or green. If you ever see an AMD or Nvidia splash screen ahead of the title page when you start a game, you can bet it will run better with that company’s hardware.
So, which is better? Neither
There’s so much to love, and in some instances “dis-love,” about both Nvidia and AMD graphics. In the end, both of these companies rely on competition with each other to thrive. Suffice to say, the Nvidia vs AMD debate requires that you understand there’s a reason Radeon and GeForce GPUs are so similar in performance right now.
Each company is doing its best to keep up with the mindshare of the other, and that’s good for us. They’re basically fighting for our money, learning from each other’s mistakes and legislating marked improvements along the way.
It’s up to you who wins the fiery contest of Nvidia vs AMD, although we will say this: Nvidia is unmatched in the 4K market right now. If it helps any, the RTX 2080 Ti is probably your best bet if you want your PC to keep up with your Ultra HD display – as long as you can afford it. If you’re on a budget, though, Nvidia and AMD graphics cards will be about the same, at least until lower-end Turing cards make their way to the public.
- These are the best PC games you can play right now