India's streaming giant lodges criminal complaint against ExpressVPN over alleged copyright-breaching marketing
JioStar accuses the VPN service of being a "knowing facilitator" of piracy
Sign up for breaking news, reviews, opinion, top tech deals, and more.
You are now subscribed
Your newsletter sign-up was successful
- JioStar has filed a criminal complaint against ExpressVPN in India
- The complaint argues the VPN actively markets the ability to bypass blocks
- JioStar alleges ExpressVPN is an "inducer" of copyright infringement
India's largest streaming and entertainment company, JioStar, has reportedly filed a criminal complaint against ExpressVPN, marking a significant escalation in the battle between rights holders and privacy tools in India.
According to a report by Storyboard18, the complaint was lodged at the Noida Cyber Crime Police Station. It alleges that ExpressVPN has engaged in marketing practices that effectively abet copyright infringement by encouraging users to bypass geo-restrictions.
The complaint reportedly targets the specific language used in ExpressVPN’s advertising. While VPNs are often defended as privacy-preserving utilities, JioStar contends that ExpressVPN's promotion of "unblocking" capabilities crosses a legal line.
"This is not a case of a neutral tool being misused," the complaint argues, alleging that the provider has assumed the role of a "knowing facilitator and inducer" of geo-restriction bypass.
JioStar, which holds exclusive digital and broadcast rights to premium sporting events like the IPL, argues that by explicitly marketing the ability to virtually change locations to access content "for free" or from unauthorized regions, the VPN provider is complicit in the resulting piracy.
TechRadar has contacted ExpressVPN for comment on the allegations and will update this story when we receive a response.
The "Neutral Tool" Defense Under Fire
The distinction between a "neutral tool" and a "facilitator" is central to modern copyright law. Typically, technology providers argue that they cannot be held liable for how customers use their software, much like a VCR manufacturer isn't liable for a user pirating a movie.
However, JioStar’s complaint appears to challenge this defense by focusing on inducement. By allegedly advertising features specifically designed to defeat the geo-blocking measures employed by streaming services, the complaint suggests ExpressVPN is stripping itself of the "neutral intermediary" status.
This development is particularly notable in India, a market that has become increasingly hostile to VPN providers. In 2022, the Indian government’s CERT-In directives forced many providers, including ExpressVPN, to remove physical servers from the country to avoid mandatory data logging.
Now, providers face legal challenges not just over data retention, but over their core value proposition to streaming audiences.
A Global Crackdown on 'Unblocking'
This case in India is not an isolated incident; it represents a growing global trend where rights holders are moving beyond targeting "rogue" pirate sites and are instead targeting the infrastructure that enables access to them.
In Europe, the pressure is mounting. The MPA presses for VPNs to have a role in the anti-piracy row in Europe, arguing that services must do more to verify that their users aren't engaging in copyright theft.
Similarly, sports leagues are taking aggressive action. La Liga has just won a court order requiring NordVPN and Proton VPN to block illegal football streams in Spain — a move that VPN companies criticized for being technically unfeasible and a privacy overreach.
Furthermore, a French court has already issued three blocking orders against popular VPN services, ExpressVPN included. Another signal that courts are increasingly willing to place the burden of policing content on the VPN providers themselves.
JioStar's criminal complaint suggests that India is now joining this global front, using criminal law rather than just civil injunctions to pressure VPN services into compliance. If successful, this could force a major change in how VPN providers, which frequently top our lists of the best VPN services, market their abilities to unblock global content.
We test and review VPN services in the context of legal recreational uses. For example: 1. Accessing a service from another country (subject to the terms and conditions of that service). 2. Protecting your online security and strengthening your online privacy when abroad. We do not support or condone using a VPN service to break the law or conduct illegal activities. Consuming pirated content that is paid-for is neither endorsed nor approved by Future Publishing.
Follow TechRadar on Google News and add us as a preferred source to get our expert news, reviews, and opinion in your feeds. Make sure to click the Follow button!
Sign up for breaking news, reviews, opinion, top tech deals, and more.

Rene Millman is a seasoned technology journalist whose work has appeared in The Guardian, the Financial Times, Computer Weekly, and IT Pro. With over two decades of experience as a reporter and editor, he specializes in making complex topics like cybersecurity, VPNs, and enterprise software accessible and engaging.
You must confirm your public display name before commenting
Please logout and then login again, you will then be prompted to enter your display name.