Updated Friday at 16:18 BST

9690 products + 818 members

Sapphire HD 2900XT

Sapphire's HD 2900XT comes under the DX10 microscope

Our Score User Score Be first to review this!

Last reviewed: March 5th

The 2900XT seems brilliant at the price, until you see Nvidia's offerings

ZoomZoom

<>

AMD/ATI's first DX10-supporting card is with us.

Its pricing, plus our DX9 benchmark tests, place it as a competitor to the 680MB version of the 8800GTS. This is an underwhelming entrance for a card that's well over six months behind the launch of Nvidia's first unified-shader DX10-ready cards.

And, what's more, ATI/AMD doesn't even have its mid-range cards ready for launch yet, so there's no current competition for the 8600 and 8500 series of GeForce parts. In the timeless battle for graphics card superiority, this round definitely goes to Nvidia.

If you've read the review of the Asus 8800 Ultra , you'll know that DX10, like so many other elements of Vista, is still embryonic; even the top-shelf graphics cards struggle to put out reasonable performance figures under the new API.

So how does the HD 2900 XT - a high-end card according to ATI, but merely mid-range as far as Nvidia is concerned - fare in this environment? Well, considerably better than expected.

While the 8800 Ultra can't quite make 30fps in Company of Heroes at 1600 x 1200 with no anti-aliasing applied, the HD is actually snapping at its heels, with 28.3fps.

Now, assuming (which we are) that this is early days for DX10 and, once driver and API technical issues are worked out, this hints at a real value proposition for ATI's flagship DX10 card. It undercuts the 8800GTX by around £100, the 8800 Ultra by £200, and comes close to matching the performance of the latter. Not that 28.3fps is anything to write home about, but it may mean bright things for future DX10 applications.

As far as bankable performance goes today, the HD2900XT has little to recommend it over Nvidia's 640MB 8800GTS. They're available for very similar prices, and offer near identical levels of DX9 performance.

Until the various parties involved in bringing DX10 to market can work together to bring the potential performance of such cards to light, it's best to consider the Sapphire HD 2900 XT as a decent upper- to mid-range DX9 card with average DX10 performance.

Submit your review

You need to Log in or register to post reviews

Rate this product 1 1 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5

By submitting this form you agree to our Terms of Use and so are legally responsible for anything you submit. DO NOT submit anything which may violate the Terms of Use or another person's rights including copyrighted or offensive materials.

Price at Launch 265
Colour Black
Graphics Core Clockspeed 740
Graphics Interface Type PCI Express x16
Graphics Memory (Mb) 512

Similar models

Compare up to four products

7950GT

Last reviewed: February 12th

XFX 7950GT

Our score


User score

Be first to review this!

Best Price

£242

GeForce 8800GTS

Last reviewed: March 2nd

Palit GeForce 8800GTS

Our score


User score

Be first to review this!

Best Price

£258

Radeon HD 2900 XT

Last reviewed: March 5th

ATI Radeon HD 2900 XT

Our score


User score

Be first to review this!

Best Price

£269

Other models in range

Compare up to four products

7950GT

Last reviewed: February 12th

XFX 7950GT

Our score


User score

Be first to review this!

Best Price

£242

GeForce 8800GTS

Last reviewed: March 2nd

Palit GeForce 8800GTS

Our score


User score

Be first to review this!

Best Price

£258

Radeon HD 2900 XT

Last reviewed: March 5th

ATI Radeon HD 2900 XT

Our score


User score

Be first to review this!

Best Price

£269

Product Summary

HD 2900XT

Price at launch

£265

Key specs

Price at Launch 265 | MPN | OS Requirements | Interface |

Full spec

For

>

Represents decent value for money; Does as well as any card in a DX10 environment

Against

>

Ultimate performance not spectacular