TechRadar Verdict
A well executed quad-channel kit. We're just not sure you need quad-channel on the desktop.
Pros
- +
Impeccable stability in testing
- +
Supports XMP 1.3
Cons
- -
You don't actually need four channels
- -
16GB of RAM is unnecessary
Why you can trust TechRadar
Is Intel's new X79 PC platform a true desktop solution? Or is it a thinly disguised server platform? The answer to that question could be critical when mulling over the latest X79-compatible memory kits, such as the new G.Skill Ripjaws-Z 1,600MHz 16GB RAM.
There are two key issues at stake. The first is raw memory bandwidth. In standard trim, Intel's outgoing X58 platform sported three channels of relatively lowly clocked DDR3 memory.
If anything, it still pumped out more memory bandwidth than was strictly necessary.
In that context, the X79 and its quad-channel controller fed by higher clocked DDR3 DIMMs looks borderline ludicrous.
The reason it exists, of course, is to ensure Intel's closely related server systems have the bandwidth they need.
Meanwhile, arguably the best thing about the new Sandy Bridge E processors that slot into the X79 platform is their immense oveclockability. Making the most of that requires decent memory.
With all that in mind, what should you make of the G.Skill Ripjaws Z series 1,600MHz 16GB kit?
Technology and cars. Increasingly the twain shall meet. Which is handy, because Jeremy (Twitter) is addicted to both. Long-time tech journalist, former editor of iCar magazine and incumbent car guru for T3 magazine, Jeremy reckons in-car technology is about to go thermonuclear. No, not exploding cars. That would be silly. And dangerous. But rather an explosive period of unprecedented innovation. Enjoy the ride.
Blink Outdoor 4 review: affordable, beginner-friendly home security that gets the job done
Google says its next data centers will be built alongside wind and solar farms
“It's not just one silver bullet” - AWS unveils plans for continued major environmental push as it looks to lead the way on sustainability