Beats Solo 3 Wireless review

Fashion-focussed cans gets smart

TODO alt text

Our Verdict

Smart wireless headphones that make some real techy improvements, but the sound unfortunately lags behind.

For

  • Excellent wireless stability
  • Good Bluetooth-phone interaction
  • Energetic, punchy sound

Against

  • Firm headband pressure
  • Lack of fidelity for price

In case you missed the news, Apple owns Beats these days. The Beats Solo 3 Wireless are the first of the company’s headphones that seem made in the Apple image. 

That doesn’t mean they look different. The Solo 3 Wireless appear almost identical to the Solo 2 headphones from a quick glance. Instead, the changes come internally. Apple has baked its mobile phone know-how into these headphones to ramp-up their wireless skills and maximise battery life. 

In terms of wireless performance, these $299 (£249/AU$399.95) headphones are as reliable as any out there. However, you can get better sound quality at the price and for just a little more the Bose QuietComfort 35 offer much better comfort and active noise cancellation to make your work commute about 95 per cent more relaxing. 

Design

The Beats Solo 3 Wireless do not represent a big design refresh on the outside. That’s sensible. 

Beats headphones are among the most recognisable in the world, and these days it’s the Beats Solo we see out and about the most. In 2014 Beats smoothed-out the lines of the set with the Solo 2 for a less aggressive appearance, and while the glossy finish of our pair has a loud and adolescent edge to it, reports you need to be under 25 to pull off a pair of these are exaggerated. 

You just have to make sure you buy the right colour. Apple sent us the glossy black version, but there are also matt black, glossy white, silver, gold, rose gold, violet and red to choose from. Quite the colour palette.

All Beats headphones used to feature brash bright red “B” logos on them, but they now come colour-matched to whatever shade you pick. The Sennheiser Momentum On-ear and Bose pairs look more grown-up, but the last couple of generations have tried to make the Beats Solo style more palatable for a wider audience. 

The Beats Solo 3 Wireless build is much the same as ever, though, and it may make some of you look at the price a little suspiciously. Most of the frame is plastic, with only the fold-up hinge and the skeleton of the headband made of metal for, extra strength.

The pads are synthetic leather-topped foam, and the fake leather really isn’t all that convincing either. Synthetic stuff can look almost indistinguishable from the real thing these days, but this is very clearly plastic-based. 

Beats’ headband padding doesn’t seem luxurious either, but this time it has a definite purpose. The Beats Solo 3 Wireless use squidgy rubber for the part that sits on your head. It spreads the pressure well and is much higher-friction than conventional headband padding. The idea is you’ll be able to wear these headphones while out jogging without them gradually working their way off.

It’s not just the headband that makes this possible, though. The Beats Solo 3 Wireless also have a fairly firm grip on your head, which initially doesn’t feel that comfortable compared to a set of over-ear headphones. 

If you wear glasses with chunky stems, you’ll likely find that after a few hours you start to feel a bit of gnawing discomfort in your ear cartilage. However, this is a problem of runner-ready on-ear headphones in general, rather than specific to the Beats Solo 3 Wireless. In this specific class actually fairly comfy too, thanks to ear cups that shift to fit your head’s contours in order to spread out the pressure as evenly as possible. 

Wear chunky glasses and want a wireless pair you can wear for six hours at a time without any discomfort? Check out the Bose QuietComfort 35 before buying these. 

Other external bits of the Beats Solo 3 Wireless worth checking out include the 3.5mm input on the left cup, for use when the battery is dead, and the fold-up design. You get a carry pouch in the box, and it’s a good idea to use it if you pick a glossy version. That finish will show off scratches like they’re newly-caught Pokémon. 

There are also some hidden controls on the right ear cup. The Beats logo acts as a play/pause button and the ring above/below alters volume. A mic hidden in the ear cup lets you take calls too, but the Beats Solo 3 Wireless do not have active noise cancellation, a feature that's now become fairly common in higher-end wireless headphones. 

Whereas active noise-cancellation monitors ambient noise and adds inverse frequencies of that noise to the drivers’ output to cancel it out, the Solo 3 Wireless instead use pure passive isolation, where the pads simply block out sound. While not as effective at cutting out the low-end hum of a city, it works well enough here for use on noisy public transport. 

Performance

The external hardware of these headphones is pretty solid, but there are two sides to the meaty insides of the Beats Solo 3 Wireless. One is excellent, the other just passable. 

The Beats Solo 3's strong point is the tech that goes into its wireless. Apple credit's its W1 wireless chip for the headphones' excellent up-to 40 hours battery, but the exact specs are — as usual for Apple – opaque. 

We’re very happy for wireless sets like this to last around 20 hours, and the former Beats Solo 2 last 12 hours between charges, so this is a huge improvement. It means most people should be able to get two weeks’ use before charging rather than just one. Wireless charging is super-quick too. Apple claims you’ll get 3 hours of playback from a 5-min charge. 

You can check the charge level using the 5-pip LED indicator on the right cup.

They use a micro USB cable, although there’s no way to directly connect this to, and charge the headphones from, an iPhone 7’s lightning port. Apple wants to sell us the Solo 2 Wireless as a Bluetooth headphone revelation, but when used wired they actually feel more at home with an Android phone. 

What’s actually more useful than ultra-long battery life is the reliability of the wireless signal. We didn’t hear a single burble, blip or cut-out once during testing, and we’ve mostly been using Android phones rather than the iPhone's ‘officially supported’ by this pair. 

The slightly cheaper, larger Sony MDR-100ABN also have excellent wireless stability though, so Apple doesn’t exactly have a trademark on these wireless chops. 

Their interaction with iOS devices is — for now — unique. Where the Beats Solo 2 Wireless are really just like any other pair of Bluetooth headphones, the Solo 3 Wireless pop-ups in iOS more like a Wi-Fi speaker. It appears as specific source, so doesn’t have to be treated like just another wireless accessory. 

There’s clearly something clever going on in the Apple W1 chip. And if you use an Android, you can use the Solo Wireless 3 like any Bluetooth pair, although as there’s no NFC or aptX, they make quite a basic set. 

The sound of the Beats Solo 3 Wireless is less impressive than the tech, and roundly similar to that of the Beats Solo 2. Before we get into any criticism, it’s worth noting that these last two generations of Beats Solo headphones are still far better than those of the early years of Beats. 

An approach of just making the bass sound big and fat, which tends to cloud the sound, has been altered. Now the aim seems to be to make the Beats Solo 3 Wireless sound like a hi-fi system with a subwoofer attached. 

There’s bonus bass, but for the most part it’s centred around fairly low frequencies. This results in aggressive and punchy-sounding kick drum beats without the resonant boom that so often turns big bass into bad bass. 

The Beats Solo 3 Wireless sound is lively and energetic, fitting the Beats brand image well. The pounding bass beat of Simian Mobile Disco’s Sleep Deprivation sounds suitably juggernaut-like through this pair, with much less unwanted boom than the earliest Solo headphones. 

However, for a pair this pricey, the mid-range sound quite flat, lacking dynamics. A slight lack of finesse in the sort of frequencies where mids and treble meet can also cause some hard edges to certain vocals, depending on the singer’s register. For example, Randy’s Newman’s gravelly croon can sound a bit hard. It’s not enough to make you wince or tire out your ears in an hour, but at this price we have a right to be picky. 

Listening to the Solo 3 Wireless next to the Audio Technica ATH-MSR7 and Sennheiser Momentum 2.0, the Beats pair lacks a certain sort of detail that separates decent headphones from great ones. It’s not classic audio bore treble detail that’s missing, but spatial detail. 

Where the ATH-MSR7 can deliver a very 3D-like take on fairly complicated arrangements, the Solo 3 Wireless take is much more crude and rudimentary, almost pudding-like. In Kate Bush’s Running Up That Hill, the rolling bass tom bed becoming a muddling influence that makes the track sound messy.

If you’re not listening closely the powerful bass is enough to divert your attention from these sorts of effects, but it also actually compounds the problem, upsetting arrangements and at times even making lead vocals sound almost like incidental parts of a mix when left to compete with a strong bass line. 

It’s a classic example of a headphone you might hear described as “good for dance music”, but all that really means is that it’s one of the few genres that tends not to expose the pair’s significant audio flaws. 

We liked 

The Beats Solo 3 Wireless ace their wireless tech, with very solid Bluetooth, good range and class-leading battery life. There’s a huge difference here compared with often-flaky cheap Bluetooth sets.  The new way it interacts with iPhones should also make Google think about how Android talks to Bluetooth accessories in the future. 

Their bass response is sure to be a crowd-pleaser too. It’s not meant to be neutral or accurate, but by providing meaty thuds without major boominess, the Solo 3 Wireless do what a Beats headphone should. 

The range of colours available also good, ranging from bolder shades that skew younger to plain matt finishes that won’t look out of place on anyone’s head. 

We Disliked

We hear no major sound quality improvements over the Beats Solo 2. Limited dynamics and a lack of spatial detail may leave you unimpressed if you’re not blown away by the stomach-punching low-end. 

There’s also a strange dichotomy going on here. The Solo 3 Wireless are meant to be next-gen wireless headphones for iPhones, but their wired connection won’t plug in directly to an iPhone 7 without using the 3.5mm adapter and they charge using microUSB rather than Lightning. This is good for Android owners, not so good for those who have gone all-in with Apple. 

Not everyone will get on with the Beats Solo 3 Wireless fit either. While they are comfortable for a pair of fairly firm on-ear headphones, glasses-wearers in particular should know what they’re in for: potential discomfort after a while. 

Verdict

The Beats Solo 3 Wireless make huge improvements in some areas, and change little in others. Top on its list of achievements are class-leading battery life and wireless stability on-par with the very best, regardless of whether you use an Android or an iPhone. 

They also interact a little differently with iOS devices than older Bluetooth headphones, which is a neat change, particularly when iPhones don’t allow pairing using NFC. 

Other elements are less impressive, though. Some issues are very minor, like the use of unconvincing leatherette in a headphones this pricey. 

It’s the sound that matters most, and it’s not at the level of the best at the price. While the bass is punchy and the Solo 3 Wireless have plenty of energy, the flat mid-range leaves them less sophisticated and involving than some cheaper sets, particularly if you actually listen to music rather than treating it as an incidental soundtrack to your life.