UPDATE: Read TechRadar's full Spotify for iPhone review
Spotify has developed an app for iPhone. That fact has been widely tweeted and blogged this week.
But so few people have actually seen the app that there's been frustratingly little written on what it's actually like to use.
TechRadar wanted to go deeper, so we wangled a few hours to play with it. We've held it in our very own hands. And we love it.
Going mobile has been a massive push for the music-streaming service, as exclusively revealed to TechRadar earlier this year, while a US launch isn't that far off. It's not being outrageous to suggest that taking Spotify onto mobile is make or break for the company and as such Spotify says it has been careful to follow Apple's app submission guidelines.
First of all, a heads-up. This app has only just been submitted to Apple, so this isn't a final review, just a full hands-on, first impressions piece. The app is in beta and so isn't finished - we've heard that Spotify may further improve the graphics, as well as speed up playlist synching (not that it seems particularly slow).
This is a really interesting time to see the Spotify iPhone app, especially as there has been much speculation over whether Apple will accept it into the App Store. Is it too close to stepping on the toes of iTunes? Or will Apple simply view it in the same way as Last.fm, which it waved through without issue?
The headline feature of Spotify for iPhone is the ability to save playlists for offline playback, and it's this which might cause Apple most concern (though as you'll hear, this needs Wi-Fi). It will, however, assuage the concerns of those who continue to disparage the network coverage of O2, AT&T and others.
You'll need a Spotify Premium account to use the iPhone app, which may seem draconian, but someone needs to pay for all this stuff.

Like the Last.fm app, Spotify for iPhone also means you can listen to music over-the-air via Wi-Fi or 3G but naturally Spotify's ability to search and stream any track in its library is absolutely key. The Radio function isn't present in the Spotify iPhone app like it is on the desktop, while there's also no Play Queue or way to save previous searches.
Unlike the iPod app that can run in the background, Spotify on iPhone suffers the same problem that Last.fm has - it's only single-tasking and so when you're listening to tunes, the rest of your iPhone is dead to you.
Despite the early stage of the software, the Spotify app is fast and responsive and, like the desktop software, streams tracks within seconds. Early software on the iPhone has a habit of crashing, and indeed this did once.
So let's get on with it. Spotify on iPhone. As soon as we logged into the app, we were presented with a list of playlists – there are three main tabs, Playlists, Search and More and we'll separate our hands-on into those three areas.








Your comments (7) Click to add a new comment
mbb
July 31st 2009
7. @Philnash £10 a month for all the music you like is fairly reasonable (especially with the offline listening options), but it's got the old problem of not *seeming* like good value when people are happy with the free version.
It would be like if YouTube started charging for Google ad free versions. No one would bother when they're used to the free service.
Alert a moderator
philnash
July 31st 2009
6. I think £10 a month for all the music you can get your hands on, on your computer and iPhone is a fantastic proposition. Don't forget, it's not just for the mobile version, you also get higher quality streams and no adverts.
I have been tempted to upgrade to premium for a while now, but the opportunity to use Spotify mobile will push me to do so and I will be a happier person for it (no more adverts interrupting my all day listening of Spotify).
I cannot wait for this app to get approved
Alert a moderator
taio101
July 31st 2009
5. I love spotify but I would never pay £10 per month to use it on my iPhone. That's a rip off!!!
Alert a moderator
sonic9255
July 31st 2009
4. They should have used a similar pricing model as the desktop app. Say £3p/m with adverts (then 10 without) as the ability to advertise targeted adverts to mobile users is priceless. Therefore the revenue could be drawn from advertisers and not users.
Alert a moderator
jmace86
July 31st 2009
3. I can live with paying one-off fee for the app, but I am not going to pay a £10/month subscription fee.
Seems like an odd choice really, considering that Spotify on the PC has a free version that is ad-supported. Why not do the same for the app?
Alert a moderator
ralphh
July 30th 2009
2. This is blurring between a napster go style service and price, oh why cant we just have napster on iphone sigh
Alert a moderator
mcdragon
July 30th 2009
1. I think you put the finger on it in the 2nd and 3rd paragraph of the last page of this article. I am a frequent Spotify user but a tenner a month seems to steep and might end up leaving many users luke-warm and preferring their favourite torrent site.
Alert a moderator
Tell us what you think
You need to Log in or register to post comments