Unless you've been stuck on the dark side of Jupiter you'll have noticed that there's been a launch by Microsoft regarding its new Windows Phone 7 platform.
We've been covering this for nigh-on a year and a half now, and it's certainly shaping up to be a big plus for Microsoft. But that's not what this is about.
Similarly, when a respected publication like The Telegraph publishes a "Windows Phone 7: first review" based on a non-finished version of the product, or we see 'HTC HD7 reviews' appear on other consumer electronics sites, with nothing in the headline to signal the status of the product, readers are getting a distorted sense of the story.
(It's for this reason we headline this type of article a "Hands on review" on a News URL and explain it in our Reviews Guarantee).
It's like criticising a cake before it's finished baking - you assume any faults are going to be corrected in final software and if they are still present when the handset steps blinking into the public spotlight then you can get the knives out (a la Apple and the iPhone 4).
Shouting about potential problems that may never come to pass is pointless and ultimately it's the consumer looking to us for guidance on expensive purchases who loses out.
