nikon s5100 review

Image quality is excellent. The lens resolved plenty of detail, which meant sharp images. The corners of our test images remained reasonably sharp, even with the lens at its longest 140mm setting.

nikon s5100 review
Click for full-res image

ISO performance is satisfyingly good as well: there's little distinction to be made between 100 and 400. ISOs 800 and 1600 show a little noise and discolouration creeping in, but not enough to discourage us from using it in low-light situations where the flash isn't an option.

nikon s5100 review
Click for full-res image

Indeed, stick the S5100 on ISO 1600, then use a tripod with the image stabilisation on and you should have a camera capable of surprisingly good results in low light.

nikon s5100 review
Click for full-res image

The only problem is ISO 3200 – image quality takes a dive at this setting. Colour accuracy plummets and supposedly plain areas take on mottled, grey-brown hues. One best left for emergencies.

nikon s5100 review
Click for full-res image

The only recurring complaint we had was chromatic aberration. Purple fringing was a factor in far too many of our test shots – most areas of high contrast proved problematic.

nikon s5100 review
Click for full-res image

The S5100 isn't the worst culprit we've seen, and if you tread carefully when taking pictures that are likely to be a problem – tree branches against an overcast sky, for instance – you can avoid it… but it's worth bearing in mind.