Why you can trust TechRadar
From these benchmarks the Charybdis might look the better machine, but it's not £250 better. The performance figures you're getting from the 3XS Vengeance are so close, and on the DiRT 2 gaming benchmark slightly ahead, that you'd happily go for this more fully featured setup.
These benchmarks don't take into account the superior OCZ SandForce SSD and dedicated soundcard of the Scan machine either, both of which help make it such a quality machine.
CPU performance
Cinebench R11 – Index: higher is better
Scan 3XS Vengeance: 8.73
CyberPower Charybdis: 10.32
DirectX 11 tessellation performance
Heaven – FPS: higher is better
Scan 3XS Vengeance: 25.9
CyberPower Charybdis: 28.2
DirectX 11 gaming performance
DiRT 2 – FPS: higher is better
3XS Vengeance: 90
CyberPower Charybdis: 88
Current page: Scan 3XS Vengeance review: Benchmarks
Prev Page Scan 3XS Vengeance review: Overview Next Page Scan 3XS Vengeance review: VerdictThis NAS drive takes up to 12 SSDs and looks like a PS4 gaming console; but Asustor Flashstor Gen 2 is not cheap, and a dozen 8TB SSDs will cost more than $8,000
Dell XPS 13 (9345) vs Dell XPS 13 (9350): the battle of Snapdragon against Intel
That's my weekend sorted – Resident Evil 2 arrives early on iPhone, iPad and Mac with a huge discount