
The Pentax K-x follows the cheaper K-m in its use of AA batteries. This makes it unique compared to competitors - Sony, Canon, Nikon and Olympus all use rechargeable lithium-ion batteries in their DSLRs.
The use of AAs is a disadvantage out of the box. You get four non-rechargeable lithium batteries with the camera: according to Pentax that's enough for 640 shots, or 420 shots if you use the flash half the time.
That's reasonable - we took well over 270 shots plus videos in a single day and didn't run out of power. However, if you want to recharge the batteries you'll need to buy four Ni-MH AAs plus a charger - count on spending £20 on a complete set.

The use of AAs does have its advantages though. Firstly, Pentax claims that four rechargeable Ni-MH batteries will be enough for 1,100 shots with 50 per cent flash use, which far outstrips the Canon 500D's lithium-ion battery (400 shots) or the Nikon D5000's (510).
Secondly, if your proprietary lithium-ion battery dies in the middle of nowhere you're stuck until you can find somewhere to plug it in; AA batteries can be bought virtually everywhere on Earth.
The K-x's performance is typically DSLR-like. We measured its start-up time at 0.20 seconds, which unless you have the twitch muscles of a cheetah is much quicker than you could bring the camera to bear on a subject.
There's no shutter lag to speak of and unless you're in continuous shooting mode the time between shots is negligible too - in our tests we measured times as fast as 0.3 seconds between shots.
There are two continuous modes - Hi and Lo. Pentax claims the high mode should produce speeds of up to 4.7 frames per second if you keep your finger on the shutter button. We took 11 shots in 2.16 seconds, which is actually slightly faster - 5fps.
That's impressive for a mid-range camera. It's not so proficient at prolonged bursts - after around 17 shots speed slowed, and over the course of 11 seconds the K-x averaged 2.21fps. At its peak, though, the K-x is faster in continuous mode than either the Canon 500D or the Nikon D5000, although it only squeaks past the latter.



Your comments (4) Click to add a new comment
shan_o
Wednesday at 17:18 GMT
4. I just ordered mine. [A fair bit cheaper than £550!] Can't wait to get my hands on it!
Alert a moderator
avata58
January 18th
3. I am swimming in deep waters as I try to make my mind between dslr's different but close abilities. Also between Megapixels and Lense capabilities. One think is for sure, your reviews of the cameras are excellent, well analysed and help me stay afloat untill I decide which one is the most suitable for my expectations. Cordially, thank you.
Alert a moderator
bobt
December 21st 2009
2. I changed to the k-x from an Olympus E500.
I think the k-x is far better and the quality of shots great.
Alert a moderator
ikalujny
October 27th 2009
1. I`m going to get myself one.
Alert a moderator
Tell us what you think
You need to Log in or register to post comments