Sony's smallest ever full-frame f/2.8 zoom is a powerful everyday lens with a small compromise
A lighter build but less zoom
Sony has launched another full-frame lens for its mirrorless cameras, and this one’s a little different – the FE 24-50mm F2.8 G. It’s Sony’s lightest and smallest ever full-frame zoom lens with f/2.8 aperture, but with a more limited zoom range than the classic 24-70mm.
Boasting a constant f/2.8 aperture like the pricier Sony FE 24-70mm F2.8 G OSS II, but in a compact body just like the Sony FE 24-70mm F4 ZA OSS (not to be confused with the more recent FE 20-70mm F4 G), the obvious trade-off in the new lens from those 24-70mm models is the reduced reach at the telephoto end, which only extends to 50mm.
Besides weighing just 15.5oz / 440g and measuring 3.63 inches /92.3mm in length – which is practically the same as Sony's 24-70mm F4 – other features include a dust and moisture-resistant build and a minimum 0.3m focus distance with maximum 0.3x magnification at 50mm – that’s excellent close-focusing capabilities. It’s also built for 2024’s hybrid shooters with a clicked aperture ring and twin linear motors for fast and quiet internal autofocus.
Shipping is from April 2024, and the new lens costs $1,100 / £1,150 / AU$1,999, which is somewhere between the 24-70mm F2.8 G II ($2,299 / £1,999 / AU$2,899) and the 24-70mm F4 ($899 / £749 / AU$1,209). For Sony that's an attractive price point for a f/2.8 zoom.
Something new, but is it a flawed concept?
I own a pro 24-70mm F2.8 lens, and I love the versatility of that classic all-rounder, even if it is a tad heavy. It ticks so many boxes, and has accompanied me on landscape photography adventures, and been my one and only lens for weddings, portraiture shoots and more. In fact it was the only lens I used with my mirrorless camera for years.
Part of the reason why the 24-70mm lens is so good is its combination of focal length range and large f/2.8 aperture. That’s plenty wide enough for landscape photos and even for video, while it's bright in low light and gives a shallow depth of field for portraiture, especially at 70mm.
So is the reduced focal range worth it to get what is a significantly smaller and lighter zoom lens? I get into this question more in my 24-50mm F2.8 G review, but I think there’s a certain photographer and filmmaker out there for whom the focal range is perfect. And the new 24-50mm F2.8 G is much cheaper than the 24-70mm F2.8 G OSS II, plus it's equipped with Sony’s latest design and autofocus performance, which the 24-70mm F4 ZA OSS lacks. Sony has just released an intriguing addition to its mirrorless camera system.
Get daily insight, inspiration and deals in your inbox
Sign up for breaking news, reviews, opinion, top tech deals, and more.
You might also like
Tim is the Cameras editor at TechRadar. He has enjoyed more than 15 years in the photo video industry with most of those in the world of tech journalism. During his time as Deputy Technical Editor with Amateur Photographer, as a freelancer and consequently editor at Tech Radar, Tim has developed a deeply technical knowledge and practical experience with cameras, educating others through news, reviews and features. He’s also worked in video production for Studio 44 with clients including Canon, and volunteers his spare time to consult a non-profit, diverse stories team based in Nairobi. Tim is curious, a keen creative, avid footballer and runner, and moderate flat white drinker who has lived in Kenya and believes we have much to enjoy and learn from each other.