Updated 10 hours ago

12814 products + 13849 members

Philips: our new TVs are better than Pioneer's

LED LCD TVs are the "best displays on the market"

September 1st 2008 | Tell us what you think [ 2 comments ]

philips-at-ifa

Philips' stand at IFA 2008

<1 2 >

Philips has claimed that its new LED-backlit LCD televisions are "much better" than the jaw-dropping Pioneer Kuro G9 plasmas. In a frank interview with TechRadar at IFA, Danny Tack, the director of technical marketing management at Philips, didn't pull his punches when it came to pointing out the flaws with Pioneer's plasma televisions.

"Our LED backlight product is better for a number of reasons. The Pioneer G9, black level-wise, it is good and on a par with our LED backlighting. But then, you have also light. I would say the plasma has about 50 per cent less light than the LCD so it's nowhere near as bright," said Tack.

"The third factor is motion. Motion – in the past, everybody said LCD is slower than plasma and for sure slower than CRT. But in the past two years, we have been able to bring LCD back with better motion sharpness than plasma," he said.

It all depends on colour

Tack said that it is a myth that plasma televisions have a faster response time, stating that it depends which colours are being measured.

"Plasma is not better than CRT. And the response time of plasma is different for each colour, he said. "So if you take only one colour – blue, which is the fastest – the response time is about a millisecond, or less. But when you take all of the colours into account, the overall response time of a plasma is around five milliseconds.

"Already last year, we brought LCD down to three milliseconds, and now this year we're down to two milliseconds response time. They're the fastest LCDs in the world, and so we have the best motion sharpness. Much better than the Pioneer."

'Natural motion'

Tack said that the image processor inside Philips televisions enables 'natural motion' playback, to make the moving picture as smooth as possible. He says the result is a seamless watching experience which is far beyond what the Pioneer Kuro can achieve.

"Take the judder that comes from film sources. We can make perfect natural motion. It is recognised in the industry that we are the best there. And that's also something that the Pioneer Kuro lacks.

"On colours we're ok – very similar to the Pioneer. But out of colours, sharpness, contrast and motion we're better overall. The contrast level and black level is the only place where Pioneer can keep up with us but not with brightness, and so their total contrast will be lower.

"So overall, on five elements, we beat them on four and are equal on the other."

Tack went as far as to predict the demise of plasma technology in the mass market. He says that LED backlit LCD TVs and OLED TVs will prevail as the dominant technologies, with plasma only surviving in extremely large panel sizes. More on this soon.

What do you think? Are Philips' displays better? Or is it just tough talk?
 

Your comments (2) Click to add a new comment

tvfreak


January 25th

2. sorry to say so but the tupperware look alike tv with christmastree lights is way no match for the kuro

says a dutch guy ( me )

The motion on the philips looks like the actors are doing electric boogy. extremely unatural.

The background moves very unnaturay.

Furthermore all led backlight and other lcds are very harsh unatural pictures.

Best picture when we talk about colour brightness and contrast is a crt and of coarse it has not the resolution and size we need but at these points it is stil the champion.

Pioneere scores the best crt like picture.

Most people look at televisions in a store but thats the place where you cannot see if they are good there is just too much light around.

I have had 19 tv's in three years and believe me the pioneers are the best.

Alert a moderator

techcrunchie


September 3rd 2008

1. Sounds like the Philips guy is comparing their new screens to plasmas and not the Pioneer Kuro. I have 2 kuro tv's at home and it'd take a lot for an LCD to beat them. They may not be "bright" but I think that was by design because the colors look real and not "bright". I didn't notice ANY judder when watching the olympics at home but drove me crazy on friends' plasma (Samsung).

I think the people at Philips just want some attention.

although... I haven't seen their new LCDs....hmmm...

Alert a moderator

Tell us what you think

You need to Log in or register to post comments

By submitting this form you agree to our Terms of Use and so are legally responsible for anything you submit. DO NOT submit anything which may violate the Terms of Use or another person's rights including copyrighted or offensive materials.