Fed up with the internet? The US Air Force certainly is. It turns out that all sorts of mean and horrid bad guys think it would be funny, profitable or politically expedient to hack, spam or DDoS the USAF. And the boys with wings on their uniforms are sick and tired of having to spend their time fending off these attacks when they could be bombing a developing nation somewhere.
In an admirable display of the can-do attitude for which their nation is famous, the USAF has decided that the best way to fix this is to "rewrite the laws of cyberspace". No really. That's their plan.
So what are these "laws"? I imagine that the one they have the biggest problem with is, "On the internet, no one knows who you are." Anonymity is what lets spammers spam, hackers hack and pornographers graph their porn. But it's also what lets protesters protest and dissidents diss, so there are some genuinely valid reasons for wanting to preserve internet privacy (as opposed to just being able to pretend to your WoW guild that you are a chick, say).
Regardless of how much the politicians huff and puff over this, the technorati don't normally worry about their anonymous house blowing down because it is seen as somehow intrinsic to the medium itself. But really, that's not the case at all. It's true that the TCP/IP protocol, as currently implemented, makes it very hard to verify the source of any given network packet, but that's purely because the network architects chose to make it that way.
It would be almost as easy to design a protocol that verifies the hardware address of every computer sending a packet and then appends this to an ever-growing audit trail when the packet is forwarded to another router. If any link in the chain refuses to add its own signature to this trail, then its packets would be rejected by all other routers running the protocol.
This could begin as a separate, high security network, that runs on top of the existing internet. Initially, just military sites would use it, but it would spread as institutions and businesses appreciated the advantage of a network where anonymous net-mischief was so much harder. We at home would then need access, because otherwise we couldn't bank online or renew our road tax. And gradually, the old TCP/IP flavour of the internet would be marginalised. For a while, it would remain as a place for flame wars and porn, but eventually it would fall into disuse. This is exactly what happened to Usenet in the 1990s and it could happen to the wider internet.
Anonymous internets will always exist - the terrorists, the paedophiles and the tin-foil-hat brigade will make sure of that. But in 10 years time, the idea of the mainstream internet - the one that all of us use every day - being anonymous, will seem as quaint as a street without CCTV cameras.
Now read 50 websites you'll wonder how you lived without and 20 websites that changed the world

Your comments (10) Click to add a new comment
canders
November 8th 2008
10. The law would have to be international. Tell me what country is going to go for this? China?
Alert a moderator
youfailed
November 7th 2008
9. This is utter rubbish that is not only technically innacurate but also seemingly aims to cause panic.
My opinion of this website has dropped by 10 points.
Alert a moderator
pyromaster114
November 7th 2008
8. There will never be a system that is any more "un-hackable" than the titanic was "unsinkable".
Its not going to happen, someone will come up to someone's building, break into the network, send out a virus, which will proceed to compromise their routers and the routers of another 20 companies, which will then strip all of the tracking information off of the packets, and then we have as pete_I said: unreliable stuff from a trusted source.
Alert a moderator
jessedyer
November 7th 2008
7. Alarmist nonsense.
Look how long we've been putting off implementing IPv6; you really think the big bad military will take time from "bombing a developing nation somewhere" to force you to install some new protocol?
Little fact and reality check here; the Internet started life as a US military project under DARPA; if the military's aims was to watch over your shoulder, why didn't they implement it back then?
What's more likely here is that the military will indeed create an alternative to poor old IPv4/6, and implement it on the sites they want to secure. If you want to talk to a military site, you use the secure protocol, but you can keep posting this kind of anti-establishment scare **** with the same impunity you're doing it with now.
Alert a moderator
edmigper
November 7th 2008
6. pete_l pretty much destroyed the with simple logic.
Alert a moderator
clustertim
November 7th 2008
5. Please, there will always be services like www.Ultimate-Anonymity.com and www.cotse.net to provide users with Anonymous Internet.
Alert a moderator
Tell us what you think
You need to Log in or register to post comments