MonoPulse 42A review

Unconventional loudspeaker design is the name of the game

TechRadar Verdict

Improved performance justifies the 42A’s price increase. Impressive overall balance through bass and midband. Some coloration, but splendid dynamic expression and wonderful time coherence

Pros

  • +

    Tight time coherence

  • +

    Excellent dynamic expression

Cons

  • -

    Some coloration

Why you can trust TechRadar We spend hours testing every product or service we review, so you can be sure you're buying the best. Find out more about how we test.

It's less than five years since we first encountered MonoPulse, as a relatively new brand with a number of interesting and unconventional ideas about loudspeaker design. Patron and hi-fi enthusiast Allan Hendry, worked for many years on pulsed, phased-array radar and after his retirement, applied his appreciation of the importance of phase relationships to loudspeaker design. These applied especially to the relative positioning of the drive units and their integration through the crossover network, in order to achieve genuine wavefront time-alignment through the entire region.

We actually reviewed the original version of the 42A back in 2005, when it was the top model in the range and priced at £995 a pair. Now it returns, similar in outline but somewhat different in detail, and carrying an altogether heftier £1,495 pricetag (£1,595 with external damping bar as tested).

TOPICS

The TechRadar hive mind. The Megazord. The Voltron. When our powers combine, we become 'TECHRADAR STAFF'. You'll usually see this author name when the entire team has collaborated on a project or an article, whether that's a run-down ranking of our favorite Marvel films, or a round-up of all the coolest things we've collectively seen at annual tech shows like CES and MWC. We are one.