TechRadar Verdict
The Ulefone RugKing 5 Pro is the kind of phone that makes the most sense when viewed as field equipment rather than a consumer handset. It combines excellent battery life and a rugged form factor, but balances those features with a lacklustre SoC, GPU, and cameras.
Pros
- +
Inexpensive
- +
Great battery life
- +
Excellent build quality
Cons
- -
Not easily pocketable
- -
Slug of an SoC
- -
Oddly placed buttons
- -
No 5G
Why you can trust TechRadar
Ulefone RugKing 5 Pro: 30-second review
UleFone has a rugged phone for everyone, or so it seems. The newest addition to the RugKing series is the 5 Pro, a low-cost option available for around $220.
Its calling card is a 20,000mAh battery that Ulefone rates at 110 hours of endurance, which, in practice, translates to several days of real use before you need to hunt a power station or a wall socket. The trade-off is a 629g frame that is genuinely large and heavy. Though anyone who regularly carries tools, kit bags, or works outdoors will probably not find that a dealbreaker.
Beyond the battery, the RugKing 5 Pro earns its moniker through dual IP68 and IP69K certification alongside MIL-STD-810H compliance. It can be submerged, jet-washed, and dropped onto hard surfaces and, allegedly, remain functional.
The addition of a 20MP infrared night-vision camera and a 976-lumen flood flashlight also makes this phone suitable for camping adventures and emergency situations.
Where this design falls short is in processing power and connectivity: the Unisoc T7250 chipset is functional rather than fast, 5G is absent, and the camera maxes out at 1080p video. For the right buyer at the right price, though, those limitations are entirely manageable if they don’t expect too much.
With the cost of memory and storage rapidly increasing, it's likely we’ll see more of these hardware-curated designs, but this isn’t something we’d be inclined to label as one of the best rugged phones around.
Ulefone RugKing 5 Pro: price and availability
- How much does it cost? $270/£205/€235
- When is it out? Available now
- Where can you get it? You can get it directly from UleFone or via many online retailers .
As with many rugged phones, the cheapest place to buy this typically isn’t the maker, and the RugKing 5 Pro is no exception.
Sign up to the TechRadar Pro newsletter to get all the top news, opinion, features and guidance your business needs to succeed!
Direct from UleFone, the price of this phone is $269.99/£201.59/€231,26, depending on where you are based. You can check the site by clicking here.
At the time of writing, it isn’t available via Amazon.com, but I did find this phone for £229.99 on Amazon.co.uk, which seems a significant hike for next-day delivery.
The cheapest option is AliExpress, where the prices are $226.19 (£214.40 / €244.84), making that source the cheapest choice for Americans, but more expensive than the maker pricing for Europeans.
Almost wherever you source this, it isn’t an expensive phone, but that doesn’t mean that there aren’t cheaper alternatives.
For less than this phone, the Blackview BL7000 is a great choice, as it features a 50 megapixel main camera with a Samsung JN1 sensor that performs surprisingly well, runs on a Dimensity 6300 chip, and offers 5G connectivity. And, it can be found for $200.
The downside of the BL7000 is that it only offers 7500 mAh of battery, and most of the competitor devices around this cost have 10,000 mAh or less.
But, if battery capacity isn’t a priority, I’d look at the Blackview BL7000, Blackview Fort 1, Ulefone Armor X16 Pro 5G, DOOGEE Blade 10 Ultra or OUKITEL G3. Some of these have 5G, others have better cameras.
And, if you want the same battery with a better SoC, the Blackview Oscal Tank 1 is a good choice.
- Value score: 4/5
Ulefone RugKing 5 Pro: Specs
Display | 6.78-inch IPS LCD, 1080 x 2460 (FHD+), 396ppi, 910 nits peak brightness |
Processor | Unisoc T7250 octa-core (2x Cortex-A75 @ 1.8GHz, 6x Cortex-A55 @ 1.6GHz) |
GPU | ARM Mali-G57 MP1 @ 850MHz |
RAM | 8GB (with extended virtual RAM support) |
Storage | 256GB internal + microSD expansion (dedicated slot) |
Operating System | Android 16 |
Rear Cameras | 64MP main (OmniVision OV64B) + 20MP infrared night vision (Sony sensor, 2x IR LEDs) |
Front Camera | 16MP (Samsung CMOS sensor) |
Video | 1080p max (no 4K) |
Battery | 20,000mAh Li-Polymer (non-removable) |
Charging | 33W wired fast charge; 6W wired reverse charging |
Wireless Charging | Not supported |
Connectivity | 4G LTE (no 5G), dual-band Wi-Fi, Bluetooth 5.2, NFC, FM radio, USB-C 2.0 (OTG) |
Biometrics | Side-mounted fingerprint sensor |
Durability | IP68, IP69K, MIL-STD-810H (2m drop rated) |
Display Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
Flashlight | 976-lumen flood flashlight |
Expansion Port | uSmart side-mounted accessory port |
SIM | Dual Nano-SIM + dedicated microSD tray |
Headphone Jack | None (USB-C adapter required) |
Dimensions | 179 x 85 x 26.5mm |
Weight | 629g |
Colours | Black |
Ulefone RugKing 5 Pro: Design
- Not pocket-friendly
- Odd button arrangement
- No wireless charging
The RugKing 5 Pro does not pretend to be subtle. Measuring 179 x 85 x 26.5mm and weighing 629g, it falls into a category that goes well beyond oversized and approaches a handheld piece of equipment.
Ulefone has clad the chassis in a polycarbonate and aluminium combination, using rubberised corner guards to absorb impact energy, a formula the company has refined across many generations of its rugged line.
The overall aesthetic follows a well-established Ulefone template: metal banding along the sides, pronounced corner protection, and a carbon fibre texture finish on the back panel. The rear camera module is described as visually distinctive, with a clean arrangement housing the main sensor, the infrared night vision camera, and the two IR illuminator LEDs.
A 976-lumen camping flashlight sits separately on the body and is a practical addition for field use, not an afterthought.
Where the RugKing 5 Pro diverges from most rugged designs is in the button layout, which is a curious combination of conventional and unexpected.
The power button, which doubles as a fingerprint reader, and the volume rocker sit on the right side. On the left, there are two user-programmable shortcut buttons and the SIM tray.
The SIM tray itself accepts two Nano-SIM cards plus a microSD card on a dedicated slot, so you are not forced to sacrifice expandable storage to run dual SIMs, which is a sensible decision for a working phone.
What’s odd is the placement of the user-definable buttons, which, if you have two, are often close together. Here, one of them is where you might expect it for using a talk-to-speak function, but the other is low on the left-hand side. This lower button is remarkably easy to accidentally press while holding the phone, and by default, it activates the camping light, annoyingly.
The display bezels are reported to be thick by current standards, which is a cosmetic compromise that is difficult to avoid given the structural requirements of the surround. Corning Gorilla Glass 3 is the chosen screen protection, which is not the latest generation but remains practically resilient against the kind of incidental scratching that comes with field use.
The 6.78-inch IPS panel runs at FHD+ resolution, which works out at 1080 x 2460 pixels and a pixel density of 396ppi. Text and images are sharp at normal viewing distances, and colour reproduction is described in third-party assessments as accurate.
The headline display specification is its peak brightness of 910 nits, which is designed to keep the screen legible under direct sunlight. For a phone explicitly marketed at outdoor workers and adventurers, the brightness of this display is an important feature rather than a marketing exercise.
Ulefone has added both Glove Mode and Water Lock Mode to the software. The former keeps the touchscreen responsive when the user is wearing work gloves, which is a well-understood requirement for tradespeople. Water Lock Mode disables touchscreen input to prevent false touches from rain or spray, while keeping the display visible. This is particularly useful for navigation in wet conditions.
Overall, aside from the odd placement of the second custom button, there isn’t much wrong with the external design of the RugKing 5 Pro.
Design score: 4/5
Ulefone RugKing 5 Pro: Hardware
- Unisoc T7250
- AI subscriptions
- 2000 mAh battery
I’m not a huge fan of the Unisoc SoCs, but it's hard to ignore how many phone makers are gravitating to using them, presumably due to cost.
The Unisoc T7250 is an octa-core design built around two Cortex-A75 performance cores running at 1.8GHz, backed by six Cortex-A55 efficiency cores at 1.6GHz. The GPU is an ARM Mali-G57 MP1 operating at 850MHz. Benchmark figures place the AnTuTu score at approximately 256,822, with Geekbench 6 returning around 441 in single-core and 1,426 in multi-core testing.
Those numbers put this firmly in the budget-to-mid-range territory, well behind current flagship processors. For everyday tasks such as navigation, communication, document viewing, and running field-specific applications, the T7250 is serviceable. Where it will show its limits is in graphics-heavy gaming or any processor-intensive creative work.
The 8GB of RAM and 256GB of storage are enough for most purposes, but hardly generous. Thankfully, the microSD expansion slot provides additional headroom without compromising the dual-SIM capability.
Android 16 is the operating system, which is notable and puts this phone ahead of many rivals in terms of software currency. Ulefone has also included a suite of AI productivity features, although I’m reasonably sure that it doesn’t offer inherent AI processing powers.
The AI functionality on offer is cloud-based and requires a subscription; I’d avoid it like the plague.
Of greater use is the 20,000 mAh battery, which is enough to keep this relatively low-power device running for at least four days or more. The only caveat to the large battery capacity is that the maximum recharge wattage is 33W.
Even with the provided 33W PSU, the RugKing 5 Pro took an inordinate amount of time to recharge, especially when it was down to the last 10%. This isn’t a phone you want to find that didn’t charge before you are about to leave on a long journey.
A 6W wired reverse charging function turns the phone into a portable power bank, allowing it to top up other devices such as earbuds, a smartwatch, or a colleague's handset via the USB-C port. Wireless charging is not supported.
Returning to the SoC, one critical limitation of this design is that it doesn’t support 5G comms, only 4G LTE, 3G and 2G. Equally, the Wi-Fi is dual-band, covering 2.4GHz and 5GHz networks. Bluetooth 5.2 handles peripheral connectivity. NFC is present for contactless payments and device pairing, which is practically useful even in industrial contexts. FM radio is included.
The takeaway from this hardware platform is that this isn’t for anyone with special performance requirements, unless those are to run for an impressive length of time on its ample battery capacity.
- Hardware score: 3/5
Ulefone RugKing 5 Pro: Cameras
- 64MP and 20MP on the rear
- 16MP on the front
- Three cameras in total
The UleFone RugKing 5 Pro has three cameras:
Rear camera: 64MP Omnivision OV64B40 Sensor, 20MP Sony IMX350(Night Vision)
Front camera: 16MP Samsung S5K3P8 SP
The RugKing 5 Pro features a dual-rear-camera setup, which, on paper, appears suitable for capturing video and still images while away from home.
The primary shooter is a 64MP sensor from OmniVision, the OV64B, which handles standard photography. The secondary camera, the veritable Sony IMX350, is the more interesting of the two: a 20MP infrared night vision unit paired with two IR LEDs.
The night vision system allows the phone to capture usable imagery in complete darkness by using IR illumination rather than visible light. This has obvious utility for anyone working in poor lighting, conducting inspections, or exploring environments after dark.
The 16MP front camera uses a Samsung CMOS sensor and is aimed at video calling and documentation, which seems adequate for those jobs.
What’s harder to comprehend is why the Omnivision OV64B40, a 64MP sensor, only captures 1080p video, the same resolution as the 16MP front-facing Samsung sensor.
There is no 4K, or even 2K, capability, which may be a straightforward limitation of the SoC and sensor combination. For a phone at this price point and with this emphasis, that might be seen as an acceptable trade-off, though it is worth noting if the buyer has media production requirements or just expects something better from a 64MP sensor.
For basic image capture, the cameras on this phone are acceptable, but if you want to document a location or journey, I’d pick something that can at least record video at 1080p or higher.
Ulefone RugKing 5 Pro Camera samples













- Camera score: 3.5/5
Ulefone RugKing 5 Pro: Performance
- Battery-efficient SoC
- Dire CPU and GPU results
Phone
|
| UleFone RugKing 5 Pro
| Blackview Oscal Tank 1
|
SoC
|
| Unisoc T7250
| MediaTek Dimensity 7050
|
GPU
|
| ARM Mali-G57
| ARM Mali‑G68 MC4
|
NPU
|
| N/A
| MediaTek NPU 550
|
Memory
|
| 8GB/256GB
| 12GB/256GB
|
Weight
|
| 629g
| 640g
|
Battery
|
| 20000
| 20000
|
Geekbench
| Single
| 441
| 920
|
| Multi
| 1424
| 2466
|
| OpenCL
| 734
| 2471
|
| Vulkan
| 718
| 3036
|
PCMark
| 3.0 Score
| 8550
| 11684
|
| Battery
| 37h 7m
| 33h 57m
|
Charge 30
| %
| 15
| 13
|
Passmark
| Score
| 6096
| 6861
|
| CPU
| 3042
| 5285
|
3DMark
| Slingshot OGL
| 1842
| 5293
|
| Slingshot Ex. OGL
| 1247
| 4150
|
| Slingshot Ex. Vulkan
| 1264
| 3940
|
| Wildlife
| 579
| 2232
|
| Row 20 - Cell 0 | Nomad Lite
| 66
| 266
|
For this comparison, I went with another rugged design that offered a 20000 mAh battery that’s close in price to the RugKing 5 Pro; the Blackview Oscal Tank 1.
What’s slightly shocking about these results is how much more powerful the MediaTek Dimensity 7050 is when compared to the Unisoc T7250. Often, it's double the performance, especially when the benchmark requires any GPU support. What makes this deficit even more worrying is that the Dimensity 7050 is a rebranding of an older MediaTek SoC, the Dimensity 1080, a 6nm chip first launched in 2022.
A modern 4nm SoC, such as the Dimensity 7300, would have a GeekBench single-core score of over 1,000 and a multi-core score between 2,500 and 3,000. And, a Wildlife score of nearly 3,200.
To say that the Unisoc T7250 is underwhelming is an understatement. However, being a slug has one virtue, and it's that it makes the 20000 mAh battery last a long time.
In fact, when testing, the benchmark had an issue for some reason and stopped with 35% of the battery capacity still available, so it would have achieved more than 40 hours had that not happened.
The flipside of that coin, and this goes for both phones, is how slowly it recharges. Filling the 20000 mAh capacity from zero could easily take six hours or more, so don’t forget to plug it in before bed.
In short, those looking for CPU or GPU performance need to look elsewhere, but battery life is exceptional because it runs at these levels.
- Performance score: 3/5
Ulefone RugKing 5 Pro: Final verdict
There are some good things about this phone, especially its battery life, but they are overshadowed to some extent by the subpar SoC, video capture resolution, and a slow-charging battery.
All that said, given the price of this device, are those things an issue? That depends on exactly what the buyer is anticipating using the RugKing 5 Pro for.
If it’s a basic phone that takes over from the daily driver when the owner goes onto a building site, into the jungle or into a wet or dusty environment, then there is a place for it.
My concern is that it won’t take long to find the limitations of this device, and perhaps spending another $50 or more might have avoided those issues from the outset.
But, if all you want is a modern Android platform on hardware that’s abuse-resistant, then the RugKing 5 Pro is an option. But I’d check other phones in its price range for something that’s lighter and uses a more impressive platform.
Should I buy a Ulefone RugKing 5 Pro?
Attributes | Notes | Rating |
|---|---|---|
Value | Inexpensive for a phone with 20000 mAh battery | 4/5 |
Design | Heavy and thick, with an annoying button layout | 4/5 |
Hardware | Underwhelming SoC, but large battery and decent screen | 3/5 |
Camera | Reasonable for still photography, but only 1080p video | 3.5/5 |
Performance | Slow SoCs and GPU combination, but excellent battery life | 3/5 |
Overall | Cheap, but the performance is lacklustre | 3.5/5 |
Buy it if...
You need a phone for outdoors
The water and dust resistance on this phone is sufficient for extreme weather conditions and even being immersed. But it is heavy, has awkwardly placed buttons, and is unsuitable for small hands.
You need extended battery life
The 20000 mAh battery in this phone can keep it working for a week or more. Just make sure to fully charge it before leaving civilisation.
Don't buy it if...
You need a daily driver
If weight and size matter to you, then give this a miss. At 629g and 26.5mm deep, this is not a pocketable device by any reasonable definition.
You need 4K video
The best video resolution on offer is only 1080p, which is disappointing. It’s better at still images, but there are rugged phones available with much better cameras than this one.
Also Consider
Blackview Oscal Tank 1
Another inexpensive phone with a 20000 mAh. But in this case, it comes with a superior SoC platform and a better camera cluster than the RugKing 5 Pro. Therefore, you get 4K video recording on both rear and front sensors, and you also get an SoC that supports 5G comms.
Read my full Blackview Oscal Tank 1 review
Ulefone Armour Mini 20 Pro
A practical, 5G rugged design with an inbuilt camping light, night vision camera, but with less battery than the Tank X, and fewer features. This makes the phone easily pocketable and usable like a normal phone.
Read our full Ulefone Armor Mini 20 Pro review
For more ruggedized devices, we've reviewed the best rugged tablets, the best rugged laptops, and the best rugged hard drives
Mark is an expert on 3D printers, drones and phones. He also covers storage, including SSDs, NAS drives and portable hard drives. He started writing in 1986 and has contributed to MicroMart, PC Format, 3D World, among others.
You must confirm your public display name before commenting
Please logout and then login again, you will then be prompted to enter your display name.


