The web has come a long way in a short space of time. Today, many people live huge amounts of their lives online, engrossed in social networking, consuming news and media, and shopping via thousands of online retailers.
Although the likes of Flickr and Facebook can provide you with an online home of sorts, they're akin to renting a flat from a really strict landlord. You can hang your pictures on the wall, but can't do anything about the décor – and knocking down some walls is totally out of the question. However, create your own website and you can do whatever you like with it.
Unfortunately, web design can be complex, and although online website creation services exist to lend a helping hand, their interfaces are often alien, and working online can be slow, due to connection speeds. Also, many of these services churn out unimpressive results.
Instead, you're better off working with a dedicated desktop-based application, and we've brought together six leading Mac-based examples for this group test. Since this test is centred around beginners, we're placing firm emphasis on usability and speed.
We'll look at how easy the tools are to use, and whether any bundled templates are visually pleasing, flexible and relevant. And we'll also find out whether our half-dozen chosen apps are suitable for getting galleries, blogs and more online with the minimum of effort.
On test:
- The Escapers Flux
- Apple iWeb
- Karelia Sandvox
- XtraLean Software ShutterBug
- Realmac Software RapidWeaver
- Softpress Freeway Express
Ease of use
There's stark contrast between the user-friendly apps on test and those that are more impenetrable. Of the latter, Freeway Express and Flux want to be QuarkXPress and Coda, respectively, and are too complex for beginners, while ShutterBug's esoteric interface is hard to love and often unforgiving.

TOO HARD: Freeway strives to mimic QuarkXpress, making it too complex for absolute beginners
At the other end of the scale, iWeb is a huge success. It's everything you'd expect from an Apple application – the clean interface, with large icons, straightforward sidebars and usable inspectors, is a joy to use. iWeb is very occasionally awkward, but mostly works in exactly the way you'd expect, and in a very 'Mac' manner. Sandvox is similarly accessible and intuitive, aping iWeb's clean, efficient style.
RapidWeaver also takes a modern Mac-like approach, and is mostly intuitive, despite offering more under-the-hood power than iWeb and Sandvox. However, we weren't keen on the split between editing content and visual previews, preferring the 'live' editing of the other leading apps.
Scores:
Flux 2/5
iWeb 5/5
Sandvox 5/5
ShutterBug 3/5
RapidWeaver 4/5
Freeway Express 1/5
Templates
Unfortunately ShutterBug and Freeway Express offer rather dated templates, but the other four applications provide a good, varied and modern selection. Although some templates are more specific and limited than others, every one of these applications provides at least a handful of smart generic themes that you can use as the basis for a wide variety of sites.
With the exception of Flux and Freeway, themes are switchable, and iWeb curiously enables you to apply an individual theme to each page.
iWeb, RapidWeaver and Sandvox also go the extra mile in another way, providing pre-set page types, such as galleries and blogs.

CHOICE: RapidWeaver provides an ample selection of pre-set page types to add to your website
iWeb makes more effort regarding interesting layout variations (Sandvox and RapidWeaver's are more rigid and uniform), but lacks a contact-form page type. Some customisation is also available, although complex templates often suffer when tinkered with. RapidWeaver's ability to save custom styles for templates is welcome, however.
Scores:
Flux 3/5
iWeb 4/5
Sandvox 4/5
ShutterBug 2/5
RapidWeaver 4/5
Freeway Express 2/5
Adding images
When it comes to helping photographers Flux and Freeway Express do very little, and RapidWeaver also disappoints in this area. Although it integrates nicely with iPhoto, the resulting galleries are divorced from the layout, and RapidWeaver's Flash slideshows aren't terribly impressive. Sandvox also comes a little unstuck — although gallery setup is simple (drag and drop from the Media palette into a Photo Album page) and display options plentiful, the resulting galleries are dull.
For images, iWeb's the clear winner. Integration with iPhoto is first rate, and plentiful options for gallery layout and thumbnail decoration are provided and easily applied. The optional slideshow is also impressive.

IMAGES: ShutterBug is only just pipped to the post by iWeb, when it comes to image options
However, ShutterBug comes a close second. Although it can't complete with iWeb regarding gallery appearance, ShutterBug betters it in slideshow functionality, even offering a LightBox overlay option when thumbnails are clicked. Both it and iWeb also provide tools for fine-tuning images.
Scores:
Flux 1/5
iWeb 5/5
Sandvox 3/5
ShutterBug 4/5
RapidWeaver 3/5
Freeway Express 1/5




Your comments (4) Click to add a new comment
krisjd33
July 18th
4. Great comparison review, just what I'm looking for, however, I need information on SEO, which iWeb is lacking, and also how well the websites open in various browsers. I have 2 sites done on iWeb, but I need to re-create them because they open very poorly in IE (layout is messed up, making the site look bad) and for a small business, they can't be optimized and found by browsers. If you have a fix in iWeb for these 2 problems, please let me know. If you can compare RapidWeaver and Sandvox along these lines, also, please advise.
thanks for all the help.
Kristie
Alert a moderator
craiggrannell
June 26th
3. Charlie - thanks for the post. Having reviewed Sandvox for MacFormat and also worked with these apps at length while writing the comparison, I was aware of these features. However, the feature was originally printed in MacFormat and had very strict word count, hence not mentioning every feature.
Anyone considering the products would do well to note the features Charlie mentions, and they were taken into account when considering the test 'winner' (Rapidweaver) and 'runners up' (iWeb and Sandvox).
Alert a moderator
bbyrdhouse
June 22nd
2. Overall this was a fair and seemingly unbiased review of all of the applications mentioned.
As a user of at least 4 of the applications in question I would like to offer a couple of things to consider as well ....
::RAPIDWEAVER::
It is impossible to ignore the community that has built up around RapidWeaver. There are a number of websites whose sole purpose is to help the beginner learn and use RapidWeaver. Many of these websites have detailed and step by step instructions for for the beginner and several sites even have video tutorials for you to watch and learn.
Most of the theme developers and plugin developers are really great people and spend a great deal of effort in providing support for their product.
::SANDVOX::
Like Charlie mentioned, you can not ignore the power of the "Pagelet" ... while other applications have similar offerings no other application makes it as easy as in Sandvox.
You can use these Pagelets in the Sidebar or in a "Callout" making them first in their class.
Also, with the PRO version of Sandvox you have the ability to edit the RAW HTML. This feature might at first seem like it is not intended for beginners but within a few weeks of using Sandvox proves to be an invaluable tool that no other application offers.
::CONCLUSION::
RapidWeaver is a more mature product at this point and enjoys a lively and friendly community of users. There are also literally dozens of 3rd Party plugins extending the capability of RapidWeaver, not to mention the hundreds of 3rd Party theme styles available from reputable theme designers. RapidWeaver always seems to be "cutting edge".
However, Sandvox becomes better with each "dot" release. The number of 3rd Party designs is growing each day it seems and the developers have made available a very generous and well documented plugin SDK for budding Cocoa developers.
With either of these two products there are similarities and there are differences, but you won't be disappointed in either.
Alert a moderator
waxhawmacguy
June 22nd
1. This is a decent overall impartial review of the programs but you left out a couple of key items to note on Sandvox and Rapidweaver.
Sandvox's pagelets/callouts, which no mention was made of, give it much more built-in functionality than the other programs mentioned, and the pagelets are drag and drop simple to implement and add into a page or pages giving a user a huge amount of flexibility as to what services and features beginners can add to any page in their site. And in the pro version you can edit the raw html in your site pages which is also very helpful.
With Rapidweaver, it's large number of third party page plugin add-ons you can purchase separately such as the ones offered by yourhead and loghound give Rapidweaver an advantage over the others in page layout types and features. And Rapidweaver's forum is one of the most active around and a great resource for beginning users to ask questions in or use as a resource tool.
Best,
Charlie
Alert a moderator
Tell us what you think
You need to Log in or register to post comments