Another glorious year in tech is coming to a close.
As ever, the PC got faster, better and often cheaper in 2009.
But as one chip engineer said to another, nostalgia ain't what it used to be.
Instead of looking back, therefore, allow us to regale you with the likely highlights for the personal computer in 2010.
Processors
Early 2010 for Intel will be all about rolling out its new 32nm revision of the Nehalem architecture. Known as Westmere, the first installment of this new family of 32nm processors will be Clarkdale, a superficially unassuming dual-core CPU to be flogged under the Core i3 and Core i5 brands.
However, by virtue of being the first PC processor to combine both a CPU and graphics in a single package, Clarkdale is much more interesting than your average budget chip. Rest assured, we'll be running Clarkdale through its paces early in the new year, so keep your scanners peeled.

Indeed, we'll be taking a particular interest in the graphics half of the Clarkdale equation – especially in the context of Intel's recent decision to put the high performance Larrabee graphics architecture on ice. For the foreseeable future, in other words, traditional integrated graphics is all Intel will offer.
For performance enthusiasts, of course, the six-core Gulftown processor will be the 32nm Westmere chip of choice. Almost certainly on sale before summer, Gulftown will go under the Core i9 brand. Tests of early engineering samples suggest it's a killer – every bit as overclockable as Intel's existing quad-core beasties.
As if that wasn't enough, Intel has a brand new architecture penciled in for the fag end of 2010. Relatively little is known of Sandy Bridge. But what we can say is that is will be based on 32nm technology and pack Intel's 256-bit AVX addition to the existing 128-bit SSE instruction set. It should be a bit of a floating point beast, then.
But what of AMD? In architectural terms 2010 will be a year of making do. The much-needed Bulldozer core doesn't arrive until 2011. Indeed, AMD's CPU-GPU fusion chip, otherwise known as the Accelerated Processing Unit (APU), isn't due until 2011, either.
In the meantime, AMD will keep things interesting with a new family of chips known as Thuban. Essentially a minor revision of existing Phenom II CPUs, the big news will be a six-core variant. Given AMD's current performance shortfall, pricing should be keen. A sub £200 six-core chip by next summer? Very likely.
Right at the end of 2010, it's just possible AMD's 32nm processors could begin to come on line. The result will be higher clocks, lower prices and better power consumption.
Graphics
2010 was supposed to be the year Intel crashed the graphics party with its many-cores Larrabee chip. So much for that idea. With Larrabee a goner for at least a few years, next year will revert to form with the usual fisticuffs twixt AMD and NVIDIA.
First out of the blocks will be NVIDIA with the mother of all GPUs. Currently codenamed Fermi, it's the most complex chip ever mooted for the PC thanks to no less than 3bn transistors.
It's also likely to be the most powerful single GPU ever, eclipsing AMD's mighty Radeon HD 5870. Whether it can show AMD's dual-chip 5970 a clean pair, however, is another question.

Still, Fermi is about more than pixel pushing. It boasts significantly more dedicated general processing resources than any previous graphics architecture. By some measures, it will have 10 times the processing power of any existing Nvidia chip. Staggering.
The year in graphics for AMD will once again be one of consolidation, but in this case, from a position of strength. Early doors, don't expect too much. After all, the Radeon HD 5800 series is currently the best you buy.
As the months tick by, expect to see a tweaked version of the mighty Cypress chip with increased clockspeeds. An all new GPU of as yet unknown majesty and pixel pumping prowess – call it the Radeon HD 6800 series - is an outside chance for the last few months of the year.
Oh, and don't forget. Thanks to the arrival of the Compute Shader in DirectX 11, the increasing availability of DX11 graphics chips in 2010 should make it the year that general purpose processing on the GPU (GPGPU) finally delivers on its promise of immense parallel processing power.










Your comments (4) Click to add a new comment
nicolasmerritt
December 17th 2009
4. Last resort of the fanboi - to accuse someone of taking money when they write something of which they disapprove.
Silly, really.
Alert a moderator
wilmark
December 16th 2009
3. Lame Article - Intel is not a leader in the Graphics Arena, WHy do you waste your whole opening paragraph on something irrelevant. Secondly - AMD's radeon 5800 is currently the leader and will continue to dominate the mid to high end graphics arena for most of early next year. On Storage the vast majority of us will not be buying $600 200GB just to be early adopters - we would look forward to well sub 100$ 2 TB and beyond drives to put in our 4 and 8 drive raid home storage to serve up unlimited HD movies. I would leave the coolness (not to mention overpriced technology) to the noobs. From the looks of the article intel is paying some good dollars.
Alert a moderator
hamncheese
December 16th 2009
2. @snet:
> SO NO this intel chip is NOT the first processor to integrate graphics..
Technically you are correct. However, comparing Clarkdale and MediaGX is not exactly a fair comparison.
MediaGX was not a modern (even in its time - not by a long shot), general purpose (ie. generic socket) CPU one could just drop into a motherboard. It was mostly used for embedded purposes, and had relatively small presence in the industry.
Compare this to a CPU that complies with an existing (current) standard - one that we are likely to see power a whole generation of mobile devices.
Not the same.
Alert a moderator
snet
December 16th 2009
1. I actually signed up to say that I am tired of **** writers on sites like this. There are too many spelling errors, and the lack of research is evident.
"*** end of 2010"
and
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MediaGX
SO NO this intel chip is NOT the first processor to integrate graphics.. you should not be writing for techradar.. incompetent writers..
Alert a moderator
Tell us what you think
You need to Log in or register to post comments