Sony RX100 head-to-head: all three versions compared
It's one of our favourite high-end compacts, but now there are three variants. We explain the differences
The Sony RX100 is no larger than a regular high-end compact camera (and smaller than many), yet it has a larger 1-inch sensor where most of its rivals use a much smaller 1/1.7-inch sensor. It's a brilliant camera that's small, powerful and delivers great image quality.
But there are three different versions, and they're all still on sale. We've updated our Sony RX100 III review with a new comparison page listing the differences, and you can also take a look at our Sony RX100 review and Sony RX100 II review for more information.
In the meantime, here's a quick guide to the key differences:
- The RX100 and RX100 II have a 28-100m f/1.8-4.9 lens, while the RX100 III has a shorter but faster 24-70mm f/1.8-2.8 lens.
- All three models have 20.2-megapixel sensors, but the RX100 II and RX100 III have a newer and more efficient back-illuminated design with improved sensitivity.
- The RX100 III has a more powerful BIONZ X processor that, amongst other things, increases the maximum sensitivity to ISO 25,600. The RX100 II has a maximum of ISO 12,800 and the RX100 only goes to ISO 6,400.
- The rear screen is the same on all three cameras, but it flips out for low angle viewing on the RX100 II and rotates through a full 180 degrees on the RX100 III – perfect for selfies!
- The RX100 has no viewfinder capability at all, but you can get an add-on EVF for the RX100 II. That's not needed on the RX100 III because it has its own pop-up EVF in the top corner.
- Amazingly, despite its continued development, the height and width of the RX100's body has not changed through all three versions. The RX100 III has a slightly thicker body, but only by a couple of millimetres so you're hardly likely to notice the difference.
Get daily insight, inspiration and deals in your inbox
Sign up for breaking news, reviews, opinion, top tech deals, and more.
Rod is an independent photographer and photography journalist with more than 30 years' experience. He's previously worked as Head of Testing for Future’s photography magazines, including Digital Camera, N-Photo, PhotoPlus, Professional Photography, Photography Week and Practical Photoshop, and as Reviews Editor on Digital Camera World.