Anthropic launches a new code review tool to check AI-generated content - but it might cost you more than you'd hope
Claude Code is getting a new Code Review tool
Sign up for breaking news, reviews, opinion, top tech deals, and more.
You are now subscribed
Your newsletter sign-up was successful
- Code Review is a multi-agent Claude Code tool to iron out any AI-generated code issues
- Token-based pricing typically results in a $15-25 charge, Anthropic says
- 84% of large pull requests got issues flagged, averaging 7.5 findings
In response to ongoing studies questioning the accuracy of AI coding tools, particularly the security and privacy credentials of their output, Anthropic has launched a new tool to review code in GitHub pull requests.
Code Review for Claude Code uses multiple agents to maximize accuracy, searching for "logic errors, security vulnerabilities, broken edge cases, and subtle regressions" (via support documentation).
The tool will then highlight any findings as inline comments, with a summary comment, on the pull request to help developers identify any issues more clearly.
Article continues belowCode Review is Claude's answer to insecure AI-generated code
Anthropic also noted the agents verify findings and rank issues by severity in order to reduce false positives, while also cross-referencing with the entire codebase as context, not just the diff.
Pricing for the new tool is token-based, but Anthropic said on average a typical pull request will cost around $15-25 depending on size and complexity. A review will usually take around 20 minutes, but again, this is just a guide.
The timing of this new feature launch isn't insignificant either – Anthropic says code output per engineer has grown 200% in the past year with a marked rise in vibe coding, and there's now a clear bottleneck in the reviewing process.
Anthropic also claims to use Code Review for Claude Code on nearly every pull request internally, and it's seen great success from the tool. Early data shows that 84% of large pull requests (1,000+ lines) contain findings, averaging 7.5 issues, while small pull requests (under 50 lines) still average 0.5 issues, with 31% of them receiving comments.
Sign up to the TechRadar Pro newsletter to get all the top news, opinion, features and guidance your business needs to succeed!
Emphasizing the tool's accuracy, the company also added that fewer than 1% of issues flagged go on to be rejected by human developers.
Code Review is currently available as a research preview for Claude Teams and Enterprise plans – Anthropic didn't share details of a wider rollout, but we expect that to come with time.
Follow TechRadar on Google News and add us as a preferred source to get our expert news, reviews, and opinion in your feeds. Make sure to click the Follow button!
And of course you can also follow TechRadar on TikTok for news, reviews, unboxings in video form, and get regular updates from us on WhatsApp too.
With several years’ experience freelancing in tech and automotive circles, Craig’s specific interests lie in technology that is designed to better our lives, including AI and ML, productivity aids, and smart fitness. He is also passionate about cars and the decarbonisation of personal transportation. As an avid bargain-hunter, you can be sure that any deal Craig finds is top value!
You must confirm your public display name before commenting
Please logout and then login again, you will then be prompted to enter your display name.
