Anthropic says it will be burning lots of natural gas to feed the AI boom

A large industrial flare stack burns brightly against a dramatic sunset sky, with silhouetted refinery structures in the background.
(Image credit: Shutterstock)

  • Anthropic is becoming increasingly reliant on fossil fuels as the queue to join the power grid grows
  • Competing with other hyperscalers and conflict in the Middle East is increasing fuel costs
  • Trump is trying to increase fossil fuel energy production while simultaneously killing renewable energy projects

In order to meet the massive power demands of AI data centers, Anthropic is becoming increasingly reliant on natural gas to fuel its buildout.

The United States power grid is lagging behind on the demands of an enormous number of requests for grid connections from data centers, prompting many developers to equip their sites with natural gas burning turbine generators.

While this does counter having to build the necessary grid infrastructure and anger from consumers over rising electricity prices, it has left Anthropic vulnerable to fluctuations in fossil fuel prices made worse by conflict in the Middle East.

Latest Videos FromTechRadar

Data centers turn to fossil fuels

“Competition for access to electrical supply and data center locations with adequate power availability is intense,” Anthropic said in documents filed with the US Securities and Exchange Commission as the company prepares to go public.

Anthropic also acknowledged in the same filing that increasing global temperatures - caused by climate change - would contribute towards increased operating costs, leaving the company in something of an impasse. To remain competitive, the company needs to continue expanding data center capacity, and the only way to do that is to rely on fossil fuels.

But the same tactic that Anthropic is using to cut down wait times for grid connections is also being used by other hyperscalers and AI companies. Anthropic has predicted that “This competition could drive up the price of natural gas.”

The Trump administration has attempted to make it easier than ever for new fossil fuel projects to be approved, scrubbing the climate-improving red tape in favor of quick input to the energy grid. Old fossil fuel sites, shuttered and set for demolition by the Biden administration, have also been brought back online in an attempt to quell the growing backlog of new grid connections.

But in order to appease some of the dissatisfaction of Americans dissatisfied with the enormous buildout of data centers and the associated downstream costs, Trump has urged developers to shoulder the costs of new grid infrastructure and contributory price increases - which Anthropic said “could adversely affect our cost structure and limit our ability to scale our compute infrastructure, develop and deploy our models, and service our customers.”

Anger against data centers is snowballing

From the harms to local environments and the wider climate, to noise pollution and lowered property values - data centers have become a great unifier across the political spectrum as Democrats and Republicans oppose the unprecedented buildout of AI data centers across the US.

Two-thirds of Americans said they oppose the construction of new facilities, and it has become a key issue in the lead up to the most important election of 2026: the November midterms. Candidates aligned with Trump’s AI first rhetoric have been buoyed by political action committees, but face a difficult time at the polls.

One of the biggest issues facing everyday Americans is the cost of living. Rising energy prices caused in tandem by the US war on Iran and the increased demand from AI data centers is at the front of voters' minds, and prices are unlikely to come down any time soon.


Google logo on a black background next to text reading 'Click to follow TechRadar'

Follow TechRadar on Google News and add us as a preferred source to get our expert news, reviews, and opinion in your feeds.


TOPICS
Benedict Collins
Senior Writer, Security

Benedict is a Senior Security Writer at TechRadar Pro, where he has specialized in covering the intersection of geopolitics, cyber-warfare, and business security.

Benedict provides detailed analysis on state-sponsored threat actors, APT groups, and the protection of critical national infrastructure, with his reporting bridging the gap between technical threat intelligence and B2B security strategy.

Benedict holds an MA (Distinction) in Security, Intelligence, and Diplomacy from the University of Buckingham Centre for Security and Intelligence Studies (BUCSIS), with his specialization providing him with a robust academic framework for deconstructing complex international conflicts and intelligence operations, and the ability to translate intricate security data into actionable insights.

You must confirm your public display name before commenting

Please logout and then login again, you will then be prompted to enter your display name.