One of the questions we get asked most is: "which TV should I buy?"
And no wonder, as well as two main types (plasma or LCD) the TV market is vastly complex and can be very confusing.
To help you here are the answers to the most common questions you need to consider - and some pointers for when you go to the shops.
How do I choose between plasma and LCD?
If you're set on a particular size of television, the decision between the two competing flat TV technologies could be made for you.
LCD TVs start at 14 inches and go right up to 65 inches, whereas plasma tech is used only on TVs from 42 inches and above. There are a couple of exceptions to this rule: LG make a unique 32-inch plasma and Panasonic do a quite superb 37-inch plasma.
LCD TVs are now available at reasonable prices across all sizes, but don't discount plasma if you want a big TV of 42 inches or bigger. Both technologies are very versatile, but LCD TVs do have a few problems.
I've heard LCD TVs are blurry and plasmas are better quality. Is this true?
Because they use an always-on backlight, LCD screens simply cannot show black, instead displaying a grey-ish tone that looks especially disappointing if you turn the lights off and watch in a blackout. On the other side is plasma, which uses tiny cells of neon and xenon gas behind each pixel that can adapt instantly to changes in brightness – and switch off entirely for dark areas of an image.
This helps plasma show more detail and a lot more depth in gloomy pictures – and it's this cinematic performance that's a big advantage given the dour nature of many popular films (Batman Begins, Lord of the Rings, anything by Tim Burton). Plasma TVs also have a wider viewing angle than LCD TVs, which is important if you're likely to be watching from the side.
The main problem found with LCD tech is blur. Moving pictures tend to leave a smear and a judder that can be uncomfortable to watch, though the first 100Hz engines (where picture information is flashed on the screen twice as fast) are now used by the bigger brands – and it's slowly becoming less of a problem.
Buy a sub-£400 LCD TV and these problems of contrast and blur are likely to be obvious, but there are (expensive) exceptions that solve almost all of LCD's traditional problems.
Plasma also has its pitfalls. It's generally assumed that plasma uses more power than LCD TVs, but this has never been proven beyond doubt. What is clear is that plasma TVs show a little less detail than similar sized LCD TVs, though this can be an advantage if you're watching Freeview on a bigscreen – some LCD TVs tend to present digital channels with a lot of picture noise.
Who makes the finest LCD TV? And what about the best value?
Philips currently claims that crown. Its latest LCD TV is fitted with over a thousand LED lights and can show jet-black without any problems. If you're after an affordable but good quality 32-inch set for the lounge, the choice is endless, with Sony, Panasonic and Samsung currently making the best sellers.
Who makes the finest plasma TV? And what about the best value?
No doubts here. Pioneer's 'Kuro' plasmas TVs are the finest around with price tags to match, but Panasonic churn-out some excellent plasma TVs that are surely the best value flatscreen TVs available, regardless of the screen technology used.
Most TVs in the shops and online seem to be LCD TVs. Is plasma in danger of disappearing? And, if so, should I avoid investing in it?
Double negative. It's true that although plasma was the original flatscreen tech, the mass-market demand for sub-42-inch sets has seen LCD build up quite a lead among buyers. Now only one in ten flat TVs sold use plasma screens, though this hides the fact that plasma is still very popular for screens over 42 inches.
LCD TV's massive popularity is largely based on its lower production cost and price on the shelves, though with the UK's thirst for ever-bigger flatscreen TVs, plasma could be about to make a comeback. At present, very few budget plasma TVs are produced and it's fast becoming a premium technology for home cinema aficionados, though Panasonic's aggressive pricing for its 42-inch plasmas (less than £700 for its TH-42PX80) is keeping plasma tech in the mass market.






Your comments (4) Click to add a new comment
farmerbob
December 11th 2008
4. What about DLP? The new LED fired Samsung and Mitsubishi sets area amazing, huge screen size and low power consumption. And since they use LED's as the light source the life of the unit is listed up to 11 years, whereas, LCD and Plasmas are 3-4. Also there are no problems with motion smearing, pixelation and one set I saw listed at 1,000,000:1 Contrast Ratio.
My new Samsung 50" lamp, I wanted the LED version but they disappeared from the market, DLP's picture is so incredible that it can bring tears to your eyes. And that's not in a bad way. OTA channels are as good if not better than digital satellite and SD programming is great no need to worry about 60, 120, 200Hz.
Alert a moderator
fps_asm
December 7th 2008
3. Plasmas on average use 3x more power then a LCD..
1080p on a plasma is the same as a LCD.. i.e no picture detail loss..
average latency of a Philips LCD TV is less then a viera plasma TV
Alert a moderator
dervheid
December 5th 2008
2. I've read through this article twice now, and I can honestly say it leaves me with even MORE questions than it answers.
Alert a moderator
sanderton
December 3rd 2008
1. "This helps plasma show more detail "
"plasma TVs show a little less detail"
Which?
I don't agree that plasmas show less detail. Why would they?
Alert a moderator
Tell us what you think
You need to Log in or register to post comments