Updated 18 minutes ago

Facebook founder says the era of privacy is over

Zuckerberg backtracks

January 11th 2010 | Tell us what you think [ 5 comments ]

facebook-founder-says-the-era-of-privacy-is-over

Facebook founder says the era of privacy is over

Mark Zuckerberg, the founder of Facebook, has said that the growth of social networking over the last decade means that people no longer have an expectation of privacy.

The 25-year-old Facebook entrepreneur was speaking at TechCrunch's 'Crunchie' awards in San Francisco over the weekend and said that privacy was no longer a "social norm".

"People have really gotten comfortable not only sharing more information and different kinds, but more openly and with more people… That social norm is just something that has evolved over time," said Zuckerberg.

"When I got started in my dorm room at Harvard, the question a lot of people asked was, 'why would I want to put any information on the internet at all?'

"Then in the last 5 or 6 years, blogging has taken off in a huge way, and just all these different services that have people sharing all this information."

By no coincidence at all, Facebook has recently changed the privacy settings of its 350 million users. Have you checked your settings recently?

Zuckerberg backtracks

"A lot of companies would be trapped by the conventions and their legacies of what they've built," said the Facebook founder.

"Doing a privacy change for 350 million users is not the kind of thing that a lot of companies would do. But we viewed that as a really important thing, to always keep a beginner's mind and what would we do if we were starting the company now and we decided that these would be the social norms now and we just went for it."

Microsoft researcher and social networking expert Danah Boyd disagrees, having told the Guardian: "Kids have always cared about privacy, it's just that their notions of privacy look very different than adult notions."

We reported back in October how Zuckerberg was changing his thinking, and his position on, the private versus the public space on Facebook.

Is Facebook, or 'Facecrack' as many bored office workers refer to it these days, your favourite waste of time? If so, you might just want to check those privacy settings again…

Via Guardian.co.uk

 

Your comments (5) Click to add a new comment

derekblankmccoy


January 11th 2010

5. I must agree with Zuckerberg. I don't really care if half the world can see my photo album, or where I live, or who my friends are or what my interests are. People have become too OTT with privacy, it's selfish in a way. To think that your info is so important that someone out there is stalking you. And so what if they are? It doesn't affect me. You've seen my face and you know where I live.... how is that any more invading than seeing people on the street?

Alert a moderator

ginga_nut


January 11th 2010

4. well, if the era of privacy is over... So is my Facebook membership.. Bye.

Alert a moderator

holdenweb


January 11th 2010

3. Wishful thinking by someone who believe the whole world is already on Facebook and wants to invade our privacy.

Alert a moderator

nitrofan


January 11th 2010

2. Quote:

"People have really gotten comfortable not only sharing more information and different kinds, but more openly and with more people… That social norm is just something that has evolved over time," said Zuckerberg.

Zuckerberg is of course talking complete nonsense, many people simply do not realise the risks systems like facebook pose to their privacy, Zuckerberg has exploited this fact and he NOW tries to pass it off as a considered action on the part of his subscribers to do away with privacy.

I for one still value my privacy and will not submit my details to ANY application or service provider that does not offer me a satisfactory privacy policy.

The CIA wanted a database of every US citizen but were denied it, they must be wetting themselves laughing at how simple it has been to get all that info without even trying and at no cost to themselves!!!!!!!

Alert a moderator

richmurrills


January 11th 2010

1. Must control fist of death.....

Alert a moderator

Tell us what you think

You need to Log in or register to post comments

By submitting this form you agree to our Terms of Use and so are legally responsible for anything you submit. DO NOT submit anything which may violate the Terms of Use or another person's rights including copyrighted or offensive materials.