‘These actions are unprecedented and unlawful’: Anthropic sues Pentagon over “supply chain risk” designation — claims free speech and due process violations
Anthropic is starting a fresh battle with the Pentagon
Sign up for breaking news, reviews, opinion, top tech deals, and more.
You are now subscribed
Your newsletter sign-up was successful
- Anthropic has filed two lawsuits against the Pentagon
- The lawsuits call upon the courts to remove the "supply chain designation"
- Anthropic feared its Claude model would be used for mass domestic surveillance and fully autonomous weapons systems.
Anthropic has filed two federal lawsuits against the Pentagon for designating the AI company as a “supply chain risk” over its refusal to provide full access to its Claude model.
Citing fears of mass domestic surveillance and fully autonomous weapons systems, Anthropic had drawn red-lines in the Pentagon’s usage of its model.
Anthropic subsequently lost its $200 million contract with the Department of Defense, and its technology is now banned from use by government contractors working on behalf of the US military.
Article continues belowFar reaching implications for AI
"The Constitution does not allow the government to wield its enormous power to punish a company for its protected speech. No federal statute authorizes the actions taken here,” Anthropic wrote, with the lawsuits also alleging the company’s due process rights have been violated, according to Reuters.
The two lawsuits request that the courts remove the “supply chain risk” designation, block its enforcement, and make federal agencies withdraw directives to stop the use of Anthropic’s tools.
Following the battle between Anthropic and the Pentagon over the use of Claude, Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei made clear his stance on the issue, stating, “We cannot in good conscience accede to their request.”
While the Department of Defense has not issued a comment on the lawsuit, Liz Huston, a spokeswoman for the White House, said Anthropic was “a radical left, woke company,” adding that, “Under the Trump Administration, our military will obey the United States Constitution – not any woke AI company's terms of service.”
Sign up to the TechRadar Pro newsletter to get all the top news, opinion, features and guidance your business needs to succeed!
Before Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth levelled the designation against Anthropic, President Trump stated that the company was being run by “left wing nut jobs.” President Trump also previously threatened Anthropic to “get their act together,” or he would “use the Full Power of the Presidency to make them comply, with major civil and criminal consequences to follow.”
OpenAI has since stepped up to fill the gap left by Anthropic by extending its contract with the Pentagon, but was forced to quickly backtrack on wording within its contract that would have allowed the Pentagon to use its AI models in exactly the same way Anthropic feared its Claude model would be used.
OpenAI’s head of robotics has resigned over the company’s new deal with the Pentagon, stating in a social media post that, “surveillance of Americans without judicial oversight and lethal autonomy without human authorization are lines that deserved more deliberation than they got.”
The Trump administration has frequently cited its desire to reduce regulations on technology in order to allow the US to retain AI superiority - most recently in its newly unveiled cyber strategy. However, less regulation appears to translate into allowing the Trump administration free reign to use technology however it sees fit to achieve its own aims, regardless of the consequences.

➡️ Read our full guide to the best identity theft protection
1. Best overall:
Aura
2. Best for families:
IdentityForce
3. Best for credit beginners:
Experian IdentityWorks

Benedict has been with TechRadar Pro for over two years, and has specialized in writing about cybersecurity, threat intelligence, and B2B security solutions. His coverage explores the critical areas of national security, including state-sponsored threat actors, APT groups, critical infrastructure, and social engineering.
Benedict holds an MA (Distinction) in Security, Intelligence, and Diplomacy from the Centre for Security and Intelligence Studies at the University of Buckingham, providing him with a strong academic foundation for his reporting on geopolitics, threat intelligence, and cyber-warfare.
Prior to his postgraduate studies, Benedict earned a BA in Politics with Journalism, providing him with the skills to translate complex political and security issues into comprehensible copy.
You must confirm your public display name before commenting
Please logout and then login again, you will then be prompted to enter your display name.