Updated 1 hour ago

11171 products + 4009 members

Recording News

Freeview vs. Freesat: the pros and cons

Will today's digital decoders serve us well as we embrace the coming flood of HD channels?

August 6th | Tell us what you think [ 3 comments ]

freesat

Both boxes do their core jobs well, even though the spectre of DRM won't go away

ZoomZoom

<>

Rant mode on: DRM has always been a bane to both consumers and suppliers, and the sooner suppliers realise that, the better. We're specifically looking at Sky here.

With its attractive selection of television channels and fancy-pants set top boxes, Sky is almost single-handedly responsible for thrusting the next generation of television into the living rooms of the UK, and not always to the tech-literate.

In fact, Sky has been specifically targeting a more mature audience with its Parkie-endorsed tales of Sky+ being luddite-proof. But us non-luddites, looking at Sky's technology from a rather different angle, smell a rat.

You can't actually transfer your recorded files to any other device because they're encrypted; essentially they're copies of the incoming transmission that the set top box decodes with the help of your viewing card. Actually shifting a recording onto, say, a portable device would involve a long-winded process likely to involve a DVD recorder and several conversion steps – not exactly convenient.

We can't entirely blame Sky for this. Encrypted streams are, sadly, a necessity of subscription-based broadcasting, and a live conversion is out of the question with such little processing power. However, we can shake our fist at the DRM for denying us the simple pleasure of device-shifting.

As we've found while testing Humax's Foxsat HD Freesat box, such awkwardness is not restricted to digital recordings or even to subscription-based channels. There's no hard drive in the basic Foxsat-HD, just a stack of MPEG processing power and a swathe of relevant components.

But it doesn't avoid the spindly fingers of DRM: try to watch a 'restricted' HD broadcast over a component connection – a perfectly reasonable request, we think – and you'll be shooed away, forced to watch over HDMI or drop down to standard definition.

This is the forward-thinking equivalent of a 'no recording' broadcast flag, technology that has been possible and indeed discussed for years, but never implemented. HDCP is coming into its own.

With that in mind, initial forays into the world of the Topfield TF5810PVR are quite refreshing. It's open, for a start – no encryption, no lock-outs and a section in the manual that clearly explains how to copy your recordings to your PC via USB. VLC happily plays them without conversion, and it's easy enough to remould them into other formats.

Converting files the other way to make them playable on the Toppy isn't quite as easy, though. DivX is especially difficult to transcode (a three stage process at its quickest) because the Toppy – and Freeview itself, for that matter – uses MPEG-2 encoding, and doesn't have the hardware on board to do the conversion itself. We'd probably be happier with a slightly pricier box that did both jobs with aplomb.

Most of the time – barring occasional inconsistencies – encrypted content like Setanta Sports (available after purchasing a viewing card and a separate USB CAM module) is recorded to the Topfield box unencrypted, allowing you to watch it or convert it without restriction.

Certain programming, according to reports, seems to be bypassing this feature, requiring the CAM to be plugged in to the box to play it back, or worse, rendering itself unplayable if the encryption code on the card happens to change between recording and watching. We weren't able to reproduce this, but don't doubt it's happening. Just sigh, slump back in your chair and resign yourself – it's only going to get worse from here.

 

Your comments (3) Click to add a new comment

tracyjump

August 8th

tracyjump

3. WoW, I finally got the upgrade of the Daniusoft Media Converter Pro, it's a integrated version of DRM remover and Media Conversion, I can use it convert any DRM files and standard media files now and the new version is also usable for Windows Vista OS. What a super media converter!

http://www.wmatomp3-converter.com/digital-media-converter-pro.html

Alert a moderator

granny

August 7th

granny

2. "Actually shifting a recording onto, say, a portable device would involve a long-winded process likely to involve a DVD recorder and several conversion steps – not exactly convenient."

Not necessarily...

http://www.techradar.com/products/audio-visual/digital-tv-recorders/pinnacle-video-transfer-426939/review

Alert a moderator

boff

August 6th

boff

1. Well I was hoping for a more flexible offer, I already have Freesat from Sky which delivers clean sharp pictures at SD on my trusted CRT, recordable on a HDD/DVD via component connections. I won't be spending any money on HD until the industry comes to its senses and offers the same functionality and quality as SD. I have yet to see an HD display which equals my CRT set at SD, which is how the most interesting programmes are delivered.

Alert a moderator

Tell us what you think

You need to Log in or register to post comments

By submitting this form you agree to our Terms of Use and so are legally responsible for anything you submit. DO NOT submit anything which may violate the Terms of Use or another person's rights including copyrighted or offensive materials.

Download the Flash plugin