Updated 13 hours ago

10 best Linux distros for 2011

Updated: How to choose the best Linux distro for you

June 16th 2011 | Tell us what you think [ 18 comments ]

10-best-linux-distros-for-2011

Linux Mint 11: The best distro for your desktop

Hardware compatibility, ease of use, the size of a software repository. These three attributes are unique to each Linux distribution. But at the same time, each Linux distribution is at liberty to take and mix whatever it wants from any other.

This creates a rather unique situation, where good ideas quickly spread, and bad ones fail. And as a result, there are dozens of distribution updates each month, hundreds each year, in a race to leap-frog each other in the race to the top of the DistroWatch.com charts.

This is why the answer to the question of which distribution is best for you changes with the tides, and why we're keen to keep on top of distribution developments.

What follows are our recommendations, updated for this year, and split by typical users. Try them yourself. They're all free.

1. The best distro for beginners: Ubuntu 11.04

We must admit that despite Ubuntu's ubiquity, it has only just managed to hold on to the top-spot as the best distro for beginners. This is because the latest release will feel unfamiliar to anyone from a Windows, Gnome 2 or KDE background, although Mac users might feel more at home than most.

This is due to the Ubuntu team replacing the old desktop with something it calls Unity - a slick and accelerated full-screen interface that allows you to switch quickly between applications and find your files. Except that this first release has some stability issues and if your graphics hardware isn't up to the job, the fall-back to an older desktop creates unnecessary confusion.

Ubuntu

But there are two reasons why Ubuntu is still a fantastic choice for beginners - hardware compatibility and ease of installation. Stick the disc in the drive, answer a few easy questions, and you'll find yourself at the desktop in no time at all.

And as long as it works, Ubuntu developers still know how to make a desktop look good. Unity is a new way of using a desktop, but it's also a brave move to try and do something different, whether that's the drag and drop files onto applications feature or the way applications can be installed from the global search pane.

Ubuntu still offers one of the best looking default desktops, an unparalleled software repository, easy installation of proprietary software like Flash and Nvidia drivers, and incorporates one of the largest and most accessible communities on the internet. It's still a winner. But we can't say for how long.

Summary: Easy installation, a massive package repository and a dedicated user community help keep Ubuntu a great choice for newcomers. But Unity is going to cause problems.

Also consider: Mageia 1.0

2. The best distro for experts: Fedora 15

The Fedora distribution takes a trail-blazing, no compromise, approach to free software. It offers many of the same advantages of Ubuntu like excellent hardware support, a refined desktop and great package choice, with some of the core-philosophy ideals that have helped make Linux such as a success.

The best example of this is the latest release. Fedora 15 is the first major distribution to ship with the new Gnome environment - Gnome Shell. Like Ubuntu's Unity, Shell is an attempt to change people's expectations of what a Linux desktop should look and feel like. It does this using a similar approach to Unity, complete with animated transitions, launch bar and application launcher, but it's a shame that the two projects couldn't work together, as they both suffer from poor stability.

As a result, it's not an ideal distribution if you're looking for proprietary and closed software. MP3 codecs, Adobe Flash and Nvidia drivers are not easy to install, and get even less easier with each new release. Instead, you'll want to stick with the open source alternatives provided by Fedora.

Fedora

Fortunately, Fedora is still a distribution you can make your own. Creating a development environment is easy, for example, and the locations used by shared libraries, configuration files and kernel headers strictly adhere to long established standards.

This means that with Fedora 15 you get the best of both worlds: the cutting edge world of Gnome Shell, straight from installation CD, and a completely customisable, standard and reliable environment from which you can build your perfect distribution.

Summary: Still the result of a fusion between a noble cause and an uncompromisingly corporate business plan.

Also consider: Slackware

3. The best distro for customisation: Arch

Despite being around for a while, it's only over the last twelve months that Arch's popularity has surged, now making it one of the most popular Linux distributions available. This is perhaps surprising because Arch is definitely not a distribution for the unprepared.

Installation, for instance, is a text-based menu that does little to help you partition your drive, configure a wireless device, install packages or even set up a default user. Even after installation has finished, you'll need to grab and configure your own graphical environment as well as add any applications you're likely to need.

But the end result is worth it. You'll have a Linux installation that's running only what you need, and you'll have learnt a great deal about how it runs in the process. This is mostly thanks to the Arch Wiki, a sprawling and well-written information repository that can be used to enable even a Linux beginner to install the operating system.

Arch

Arch's package management is also worth a mention. There's no big distribution upgrade every six months. Instead, packages are updated as and when they're released, always giving you the very latest version of everything you install. And there's a mass of packages to chose from, including a bursting repository of user generated packages that are compiled as you install them.

The end result is a cutting edge distribution that's fast, configurable and built entirely to your own requirements.

Summary: A distribution that brings back some of that old Linux pioneering spirit.

Also consider: Gentoo

4. The best distro for older hardware: Puppy Linux 5.2.5

Linux's great strength is its flexibility. It runs on everything from mobile phones to spaceships.

As a result, it's extremely good at scaling, and makes a good choice for older hardware. Unlike some other operating systems, you won't have to resort to running older versions either. There are plenty of distributions that will take the latest software, the latest kernel and the latest drivers, and build them into a distribution tailored for older bits of kit.

Puppy

The best we've found is Puppy. It's a diminutive, yet fully functional, operating system that runs from your system's memory for extra speed. Just burn the 128MB ISO to a CD and boot. What's most impressive about Puppy is that while it may only be running from RAM, it still writes your changes back to the spare space on your CD or DVD boot media, getting the most from both possible worlds.

But the best thing about version 5 is that it now uses the same package repository as Ubuntu. This gives you immediate access to thousands of the most popular packages and means that, while your installation may start small, it's likely to grow into the perfect fit for whatever hardware combination you're using.

Summary: Pull out that old machine from the loft, Puppy Linux will turn it into a fully fledged 2011 Linux powerhouse.

Also consider: Slitaz

5. The best distro for your desktop: Linux Mint 11

Things have changed in the Linux distro hierarchy. With Ubuntu's switch to Unity and Fedora to Gnome Shell, there's now room for a first class distribution built around the old familiar Gnome environment.

Which is why Linux Mint 11 is doing so well, despite its continual changes to the default options of the old desktop. Gnome's top-bar is still gone, for instance, leaving the lower status window as the only screen ornamentation. And the launch menu gets the same treatment, replacing Gnome's trio of 'Applications', 'Places' and 'Administration' with the singular Mint Menu.

Mint

Version 11 is another solid upgrade, adding a new-look software manager and many other artistic improvements. If you use a lot of applications and come from a Windows background, Mint offers a great version of the Gnome 2 desktop, and unlike Unity or Gnome Shell, won't require any mental re-adjusting.

Alongside Ubuntu's prodigious packages, Mint includes quite a few of its own. And there's still eye candy, thanks to Compiz and the desktop setting panel embedded within a custom Control Center application that's growing with each release. The end result is a distribution that stands on the shoulders of giants to become one of the best contenders for your desktop.

Summary: If you don't like Gnome Shell and Unity, this is one of the the best Gnome 2.x experiences you can have.

Also consider: Ubuntu

 

Your comments (18) Click to add a new comment

flymo


January 1st

18. @witherite10

Depends on what _you_ mean by 'best'! <grin>

Here's one we really like:

We've been delighted by the stability of Bodhi Linux for the last seven months. It has worked reliably on all our hardware, and is sufficiently lightweight for our late 20th-century 256MB GoBook (P3 700 @ 350MHz) with enough 'bling' to satisfy us. On faster machines it goes faster!

A scad of optional configurations are on the live CD, and a ton more of them in the Art Wiki on the website.

Unlike most other OSes the wallpaper, decorations and colours all change when a 'Theme' is changed.

Unusually, the live CD is pretty minimal - enough to play with the appearance, system and files and a browser that can grab more apps from the Appcenter.

These come singly or in bundles, so you can start by installing from the (380MB) live CD, then add either the minimalist or full-strength apps bundle to get you going.

Then one might add (eg) the Bodhi Audio Pack, or the

Image Pack, Scientific Publishing or Educational Pack, and so on. Or roll your own, one app at a time. We like that.

We also like the configurability of the system. It allows all kinds of variation in the desktop, and the (many) options on the CD are only a beginning.

We're a bit used to it by now, but friends seeing Bodhi for the first time tend to go "Wow!" at the fluid way it all 'just works'.

Yes, I s'pose we're fans....

Alert a moderator

flymo


January 1st

17. @davidkay You might get some help on Zorin here:-

http://zorin-os.webs.com/apps/forums/

Is yours the latest release? Have a look here: -

http://distrowatch.com/table.php?distribution=zorin

Alert a moderator

davidlkay86


December 16th 2011

16. has anybody tried the os zorin its based on ubunto gnome 2.3 I grew up using slow virus ridden windows and hadnt any idea there were all these other options out there. zorin 3.1 is the first os that i found (it had great reviews and was said to be the best linux os for windows users, atleast at the time) i installed it and am impressed by the speed but there are several small bugs im dealing with one being my inability to turn off then back on my wifi card without restarting and the inability to use my webcam on facebook chat when i can use it with other apps, and on one machine i cannot install updates without crashing and every once in a while it will crash completely and i have to boot in recovery mode. im sure these are all easy fixes that i simply need to learn my linux better, but if there are any other distro's that are good for windows users but more stable than zorin i would love to know, ps i installed the zorin 5 on one machine and it was less stable than the 3.1

Alert a moderator

witherite10


September 26th 2011

15. What is the best Linux OS for a Laptop?

Alert a moderator

paul


June 16th 2011

14. @dreemteem: I really don't know what happened there! It's fixed now.

Alert a moderator

dreemteem


June 16th 2011

13. Bistros, really? Noone caught that?

Alert a moderator

andy120348


April 22nd 2011

12. Fedora 13 has huge problems with hardware. 3 different distros - Live CD, CD image, network distro - have their own DIFFERENT problems and failed at DIFFERENT phases during installation. Wheres Fedora 10 and 11 have been successfully installed on the same PC before!

Alert a moderator

ericore


February 20th 2011

11. Very good & accurate review, you should have put macpup :)

also view this:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_netbook-oriented_Linux_distributions

Alert a moderator

wizbribe


January 10th 2011

10. 'Version 13 is the latest Fedora release'. Do you mean 'Version 14'?

Alert a moderator

tomankcorn


December 4th 2010

9. all I can say is why is fedora in there deb package system rules them all

Alert a moderator

cockroach5


July 28th 2010

8. Ubuntu works perfect on Lenovo Y450 as well as on my desktop. Ubuntu's compatibility is good enough to me ^_^

Alert a moderator

epspack


July 26th 2010

7. I had put ubuntu to no 1 lot if i had not tried it to install it to my samsung laptop r418. Failed to installed latest 10.04 then finally able to install 8.10 from old live CD. Successfully upgraded to 9.04 only to have a disastrous upgrade to 9.10 where booting to ubuntu only gave black screen and even 24 hour googling did not helped me to solve the problem.

I had no problem with ubuntu till I used it on Desktop but my attempt to install it on my samsung r418 laptop failed while window xp always install soomthly on same laptop.

Alert a moderator

johnh3


July 24th 2010

6. Its not bad choises. But are Ubuntu realy for a Linux beginner? It have for example no mediacodecs for DVD movies preinstalled. When you have some experience with Linux you learn how to get them of course.I would probaly have choose Pardus 2009.2 for a beginner. Works out of the box with mediacodecs, Flash, Java and so on preinstalled.

Not on top at Distrowatch list but are a interesting alternative.

Alert a moderator

1369ic


July 22nd 2010

5. Another Attack of the Obvious Distros review on the web. Doesn't anyone try any of the less obvious distros? Did you try Zenwalk, for example? AntiX? Mepis? Or, heaven forbid, Slackware? I know there are certain audience-driven factors that are going to make Ubuntu and Fedora inevitable, but really, this could have been written by copying and pasting directly from Distrowatch.

Alert a moderator

fredbird67


July 22nd 2010

4. I gave PC/OS a look about 3 months ago and found a very pleasant surprise -- it is one of VERY few distros that properly detected the Broadcom wireless card in my wife's laptop, enabling me to get up and running wirelessly with no hassle or fuss. Since I was looking around for another distro at the time, I immediately installed it on my desktop box, too -- that's how sold I am on PC/OS. Oh, and it's Ubuntu-based, too.

Therefore, if you've got a computer with a Broadcom wireless card in it that has failed to work out of the box with other distros, I highly recommend giving PC/OS a try. Unlike any of the distros mentioned in this article, its default desktop is Xfce, which is a big plus in my book, as I ditched KDE when version 4 came out and don't want to go through that again when GNOME 3 comes out.

Alert a moderator

ercolinux


July 22nd 2010

3. If you want to try a fast and complete distro, give a try to openmamba (www.openmamba.org). Is an Italian distro write from scratch. It's easy to use, comes with both closed and opensource drivers for video and wireless, flash and skype is just one click install.

The main feature (aside from it's semplicity) is a serverside automatic system to upgrade the packages: a server checks the various sites to find the new source version of the packages and when one is avaible automatically create the new rpm. So we can have an top of the edge distro with a relative small number of developers (but for more conservatives we have also a stable release where the upgrades are less "invasive").

Alert a moderator

adamw


July 21st 2010

2. bjrosen: well, that's not *strictly* true. For instance, you can't use the ATI proprietary driver with Fedora 13, as it's not compatible with X server 1.8. Same goes for the oldest NVIDIA legacy proprietary driver, for rather old NVIDIA cards. For newer NVIDIA drivers, you need to make some manual tweaks as well as install the packages:

http://rpmfusion.org/Howto/nVidia#head-b52d8a785c3188f03b893e4f8c75f8d7e37c9e2b

this is because Fedora explicitly doesn't do anything to maintain compatibility with closed drivers, as that's not how the Fedora project works. Ubuntu, by comparison, will sometimes compromise the free software they ship in order to remain compatible with proprietary drivers.

Alert a moderator

bjrosen


July 21st 2010

1. It's easy to use proprietary drivers and codecs in Fedora, all you have to do is add the Fusion Yum repositories. With the Fusion repositories it's no harder to add non-Kosher software then it is in Ubuntu.

Alert a moderator

Tell us what you think

You need to Log in or register to post comments

By submitting this form you agree to our Terms of Use and so are legally responsible for anything you submit. DO NOT submit anything which may violate the Terms of Use or another person's rights including copyrighted or offensive materials.