Sponsor Content Created With Nitro

Thinking of Switching From Your Current PDF Software? Why Nitro Might Be the Better Fit

Nitro PDF
(Image credit: Nitro)

Changing PDF software affects more than how employees edit files. It can change what you pay, how IT manages users, how sensitive information is handled and how easily documents move through your business. If your current PDF editor is becoming more expensive, difficult to manage or unable to support newer AI and automation tools, these eight scenarios will help you decide whether Nitro could be a better fit.

TL;DR

  • Nitro can reduce total costs by including capabilities such as AI, administration, analytics and support within selected plans.
  • Its familiar Office-style interface on Windows and Mac toolbars can help employees find common controls more quickly.
  • Built-in AI tools support document Q&A, summarisation, translation and data extraction without requiring employees to move content into separate consumer AI services.
  • The Nitro Admin Portal and Nitro Analytics provide tools for managing users, licences and software adoption.
  • Nitro combines PDF editing, eSigning, security controls and several approaches to document automation.
  • The right plan will depend on the features, integrations and governance controls your organisation needs.

8 scenarios that could prompt a switch to Nitro

1. Your PDF software renewal is becoming more expensive

A higher renewal price is easier to justify when you receive more in return. But if useful tools such as AI, analytics and user management require paid add-ons, the headline licence price reveals only part of the cost.

Add up the additional charges for eSigning, dedicated support, AI capabilities and admin portals, plus the hours your IT team spends troubleshooting tools. Nitro estimates that organisations can save up to 30% annually by switching. After testing Nitro for two weeks, Interpath deployed it to 900 users in two days and reported a 72% reduction in PDF software costs during the first year, while doubling the number of employees with licences.

As Interpath’s Global Director of IT Operations put it: “Switching to Nitro is a very quick and simple way to reduce costs.”

A separate Forrester study model found that the platform could deliver a 694% return on investment over three years, with payback in under six months.

  • What to compare: The annual licence price, paid add-ons, support costs and the internal time needed to manage the software.
  • What Nitro offers: AI tools, centralised administration, analytics and 24/7 human support for eligible accounts (2+ seats) are included within relevant Nitro plans, rather than always being sold as separate extras.

2. Employees need several tools to complete one document

When someone has to edit a PDF in one app, convert it in a second, send it for signature through a third, and upload it somewhere else for tracking, productivity suffers. Every switch adds another login, another subscription, and another opportunity for work to slow down and mistakes to creep in.

When comparing PDF editors, look at the whole task rather than one feature at a time. Which jobs can employees complete without leaving the platform, and which still require separate software?

  • What to compare: Whether editing, OCR, eSigning, AI assistance and administration are included in the plans you are considering—or require separate products and payments.
  • What Nitro offers: Nitro brings these capabilities together within its wider document platform, helping organisations reduce the number of tools employees and IT teams need to manage. Exact features vary by plan.

3. Employees are putting sensitive documents into unapproved AI tools

If approved software cannot summarise, translate or answer questions about a PDF, employees may turn to consumer AI services instead. That becomes a serious concern when documents contain contracts, customer details or financial information.

That matters when PDFs contain customer details, contracts, financial information or other confidential material. According to Nitro’s State of AI in Document Workflows Report, 74% of executives said sensitive material had been entered into consumer AI tools, while 54% of managers identified security and trust as a barrier to workplace AI.

Nitro Assistant provides document Q&A, summaries and translation within Nitro. Its AI is opt-in, administrators can control access and Nitro says customer documents are not used to train AI models.

  • What to compare: Administrator controls, data processing and whether customer content is used for AI training.
  • What Nitro offers: Built-in document AI that can be managed centrally rather than accessed through unapproved consumer tools.

4. Managing users and licences is taking up too much IT time

Adding a new employee, revoking access for someone who has left, or moving a licence between departments should be straightforward. But when these routine jobs involve several systems or require accounts to be updated individually, basic requests quickly pile up in the IT support queue.

The Nitro Admin Portal centralises user provisioning, software access and licence allocation. Nitro Analytics (available with selected plans), helps administrators see how licences are being used, while eligible plans also support single sign-on (SSO).

This centralised approach helped Leonardo DRS standardise its PDF software across more than 2,200 users in over 40 locations in North America and the UK. Its CIO described the change as, “A huge win for us in terms of our IT centralization initiatives, having made it possible to standardize on a single PDF solution for more than 2,200 of our users across multiple sites. If only we could do this with more tools.”

According to the Forrester study, a 70% reduction in time spent managing and troubleshooting previous PDF and eSign solutions was modelled after adopting Nitro.

  • What to compare: How easily administrators can add or remove users, allocate licences, manage access and see whether the software is being used.
  • What Nitro offers: Centralised user and licence management through the Nitro Admin Portal, with SSO and usage analytics available on eligible plans.

5. Employees find your current software difficult to use

A PDF editor may offer plenty of features, but that means little if employees cannot find them or use them. When simple jobs, like editing, converting a file, or completing a form, require lengthy instructions, staff lose time and support requests go through the roof.

Nitro is designed to feel familiar from the start. On Windows, it uses a Microsoft Office-style ribbon, while the Mac version uses native Apple toolbars. Employees who already use Word, Excel or standard Mac applications will hit the ground running. And if they don’t, help is available whenever your team needs it. Nitro provides 24/7 human support for eligible accounts with two or more users, and they report a 95% customer satisfaction score.

  • What to compare: Ask a small test group of employees to complete a few everyday tasks during a free trial. Note how quickly they find the relevant controls, how often they need guidance, and how the familiar interface reduces routine support questions.
  • What Nitro offers: Familiar navigation backed by 24/7 human support for eligible accounts, helping employees get started without placing every support request on the internal team.

6. Your security and compliance requirements have become stricter

Nitro Smart Redaction

(Image credit: Nitro)

The documents your organisation handles—and the rules governing them—may now be very different from when you chose your current PDF software. According to PwC, 85% of business executives believe compliance requirements have become more complex over the past three years.

If employees work with contracts, medical records, financial information or personal data, basic password protection may no longer be enough. You may also need permanent redaction, controlled access, encryption, detailed audit trails and eSignatures that meet the relevant legal requirements.

Nitro provides document security controls including permissions, encryption and permanent redaction. Its security programme aligns with recognised standards and frameworks including ISO 27001 and SOC 2 Type II, while Nitro Sign supports electronic signatures under eIDAS, UETA and the US ESIGN Act. Organisations operating in regulated sectors should check that the relevant Nitro product, plan and deployment meet their specific obligations.

  • What to compare:The security controls, audit evidence, data-processing arrangements and eSignature requirements your organisation actually needs.
  • What Nitro offers: PDF security and redaction tools alongside Nitro Sign’s audit trails and support for widely recognised electronic-signature frameworks.

7. Multi-step document work is still very manual and keeps stalling

Nitro Document Assistant

(Image credit: Nitro)

A document rarely needs just one action. A contract might be created, converted to PDF, checked for sensitive information, sent for internal approval, and then passed to several people for signature. If employees have to start every stage manually, processes stall whenever someone forgets the next step, loses track of the latest version or goes on holiday.

Paper remains a massive part of this friction. According to Nitro’s State of AI in Document Workflows report, 96% of executives admitted their organisation had required an employee to print, physically sign, scan, and email a document within the previous six months.

Nitro PDF handles editing, conversion and document assembly, while Nitro Smart Redact identifies and permanently removes sensitive information and Nitro Sign manages eSignatures. Used together, the three tools reduce manual handovers and help documents move more smoothly from preparation to completion.

The impact of removing just the paper-based signature stage can be considerable. Ramsay Santé used Nitro Sign to digitise signing for more than two million patients across France, reducing the costs associated with printing, scanning and filing documents that had previously required in-person signatures. Its Manager of Marketing and Digital Strategy said, “If I had to summarise our collaboration with Nitro and our experience with digital signatures for healthcare, I would say [it created] efficiency, responsiveness, and user friendliness for our patients.”

  • What to compare: Map what happens to a typical document from creation to final signature, noting every point where someone must download, upload, email or chase it.
  • What Nitro offers: Connected PDF and eSignature capabilities that can reduce the number of manual steps involved in completing a document.

8. Automating still feels like a developer project

Bringing document tools together makes individual tasks easier. But automating this process can still sound like a major, costly IT project. However, many repetitive processes—such as converting uploaded files, extracting information from forms, or sending completed documents for signature—can run without someone initiating each stage or building a custom application from scratch.

Available separately from Nitro’s PDF plans, Nitro Automate offers four ways to introduce document automation, including options that require little or no coding. Organisations can choose—or combine—the approaches that suit their technical resources, existing systems and workflow requirements:

  • No-code visual builder: Individual business users can soon combine actions, triggers, and conditions into automated sequences using a drag-and-drop interface launched from inside Nitro PDF Pro.
  • Pre-built low-code connectors: Operational teams using Microsoft Power Automate or Zapier can set up events to trigger document tasks automatically across their existing software stack.
  • Conversational AI prompts: Nitro MCP (Model Context Protocol) connects Claude directly to Nitro’s document engine. Staff can request conversion, extraction, redaction, or eSigning using simple everyday language.
  • Direct REST APIs: Internal development teams can embed core document processing logic directly into custom enterprise software, CRMs, or client-facing portals when bespoke integration is required.

A predictable task repeated every day may suit a fixed workflow, while Nitro MCP offers more flexibility for requests that change each time.

  • What to compare: The process you want to automate, the systems it needs to connect with and the level of technical support available to build and maintain it.
  • What Nitro offers: No-code, low-code, API and natural-language options, allowing organisations to choose an approach that matches the workflow and their available software and resources.

Deciding whether Nitro is the right fit

today. Start by taking a close look at what you currently spend, which features your employees genuinely use, how many support tickets the software generates, and where manual document tasks are still slowing people down.

Nitro is a good fit if you want familiar PDF tools paired with centralised administration, built-in secure AI, and several ways to automate repetitive document work—all without unpredictable price hikes or hidden add-on costs.

Nitro offers a 14-day free trial with no locked features and no credit card required, making it easy to test the software with a small group of employees and a selection of everyday tasks. Contact Nitro to organise your trial, discuss your requirements and estimate the potential cost of switching.

FAQs

What hidden costs should businesses consider before changing PDF software?

Look beyond the advertised price per user. Check whether AI, eSigning, analytics, administration tools and support are included in the relevant plan or charged separately. You should also account for deployment, migration, integrations, employee training and any overlap while the old and new contracts run together. Finally, review usage data where possible: paying for inactive licences can undermine the savings promised by a lower seat price.

How should a business test a replacement PDF editor before rolling it out?

Run a limited pilot with employees who represent different roles, devices and levels of technical confidence. First, record how long common tasks take with your existing software and how often users need help. Then ask the pilot group to complete the same work in the replacement editor, including more demanding tasks such as conversion, redaction or eSigning.

Compare completion times, errors, support requests and user feedback, while also checking security, integrations and administrative controls. This gives you stronger evidence for a decision than a feature list or headline licence price alone.

How does Nitro PDF compare with established business PDF platforms?

For businesses questioning whether the market’s long-established default still offers the best value, Nitro is a strong alternative. It brings PDF editing, conversion, eSigning, AI, analytics and centralised administration into one platform, with more of these capabilities included within relevant plans rather than sold as separate add-ons. This can make both costs and licence management more predictable.

Nitro is also designed to make switching less disruptive. Its Microsoft Office-style ribbon on Windows and native Apple toolbars on Mac give employees a familiar place to work, while eligible accounts receive 24/7 human support. AI features are opt-in and can be controlled by administrators, and customer documents are not used to train AI models. The result is a credible business PDF platform that combines familiar tools, stronger organisational control and typically lower total costs.