European AI rules could hamstring Chinese tech companies with compliance costs

China flag and EU flag on cloudy sky. Waving in the sky
(Image credit: Shutterstock / Andy.LIU)

The European Union’s (EU)  Artificial Intelligence Act is set to come into effect on August 1, and while it will help to protect the pillars of the EU, it will also increase compliance costs for foreign companies looking to do business with the bloc.

Chinese companies in particular are expecting to have to spend more time and money to remain compliant with the AI act.

Article continues below

 Protecting democracy

The AI Act seeks to protect democracy, fundamental rights, environmental sustainability and the rule of law from ‘high-risk’ AI. However, Partick Tu, co-founder and Chief Executive of Hong Kong-based Dayta AI said that he expects costs for the company to increase 20% - 40% (via SCMP).

The act seeks to regulate AI across 12 main titles covering prohibited practices, high-risk systems and transparency obligations to governance, post-market monitoring, information sharing and market surveillance. However, the act does not govern AI systems and models used in scientific research and development so as to not hinder its groundbreaking impact on this sector.

Companies that do not comply with the act will face fines in the tens of millions of euros, with administrative penalties reaching as high as €35 million (US$38 million) or up to 7% of the companies worldwide annual turnover for the preceding year, depending on which is higher.

Speaking on the Act’s introduction, Emma Wright, partner at law firm Harbottle and Lewis said, “The EU AI Act is the first significant attempt to regulate AI in the world – it remains to be seen whether the cost of compliance stifles innovation or whether the AI governance model that it establishes is a flagship export for the EU.”

“Considering the pace of change in the technology – as shown with the launch of generative AI last year – a further complication could be that the EU AI Act quickly becomes outdated especially considering the timeframes for implementation,” Wright concluded.

More from TechRadar Pro

TOPICS
Benedict Collins
Senior Writer, Security

Benedict is a Senior Security Writer at TechRadar Pro, where he has specialized in covering the intersection of geopolitics, cyber-warfare, and business security.

Benedict provides detailed analysis on state-sponsored threat actors, APT groups, and the protection of critical national infrastructure, with his reporting bridging the gap between technical threat intelligence and B2B security strategy.

Benedict holds an MA (Distinction) in Security, Intelligence, and Diplomacy from the University of Buckingham Centre for Security and Intelligence Studies (BUCSIS), with his specialization providing him with a robust academic framework for deconstructing complex international conflicts and intelligence operations, and the ability to translate intricate security data into actionable insights.