So Google's been sued by Oracle for (mis) using Java in its popular Android operating system.
Big deal. If you've been following software patent cases, this isn't news. It's just business as usual.
Despite the weekend following Oracle's post-LinuxCon "announcement", there have been lots of discussions on the technical viability of the lawsuit. Laymen have claimed "Oracle is just dumb", while Java experts have discredited and dismissed the claims as technically baseless.
And before you say it, let me tell you, open source and patents can co-exist. A software license, like the GPL, covers the source code, while a patent can cover its implementation. It's messy as it is, and it gets messier when implemented.
Which is why, at LinuxCon, Eben Moglen, the founder of the Software Freedom Law Centre, asked the free software community to use the patent system to solve its patent problems.
Oracle accuses Google of developing Android using portions of Sun's open-source and patented Java. On top of that it developed its own Java Virtual Machine. Together these two developments are the basis of the patent violation lawsuit.
See what you want
Technicalities aside, people only see evidence of what they believe to be true. Which is why the lawsuit has got the "told you so" crowd so excited. Headlines are already screaming the death of OpenSolaris. "OMG! it's OpenOffice next". Can we please stop the exaggeration?
It's convenient to ignore the fact that Oracle supports btrfs, which as per Theodore Ts'o is the "way forward" for the Linux kernel. It's also used as the default filesystem by the Intel and Nokia joint effort, Meego.
So what will be the outcome of the case? Baseless or not, Google hasn't really (yet) clarified its stance and has only released a rather meek statement, expressing its disappointment at Oracle for attacking the open source Java community.
There's also talk of this lawsuit killing Android. That's just plain rubbish. If anything, Oracle wants Android to flourish. It would just heart it more if Android uses Java under Sun's commercial license. And that's what this lawsuit is about. License fees.
Leave the technical details for the engineers of the companies to fight over, in court. That is if this case ever escalates to that level.
It's important to remember that Oracle is the third largest software company in the world. You don't ascend to that podium position, without stepping on a few toes.
Your comments (2) Click to add a new comment
jsmith123456
August 16th 2010
2. Sun did sue MS in the past for C# from what I've read recently - to the tune of 900mil.
---
"The Sun patent portfolio has proved its worth before. Microsoft paid Sun US$900 million to resolve patent issues in 2004 after a years-long legal fight over Java. Microsoft's C# language and .Net software foundation are conceptually very similar to Java, and Sun augmented its original suit with an antitrust lawsuit in 2002. The payment was accompanied by US$700 million to settle the antitrust claims and US$350 million in a one-time royalty payment. "
ref: http://www.zdnetasia.com/why-oracle-not-sun-sued-google-over-java-62202092.htm
----
but, yes, was wondering the same thing. it's mainly the syntax that seems like a problem to me - Dalvik is not java bytecode. Worst case - couldn't Android developers switch to using another syntax? Must be missing something.
Alert a moderator
si_smith
August 16th 2010
1. What the overpaid lawyers will discover, is that Android does not infringe patents.
It does not create Java bytecode. It uses Java syntax(and Java tools) to create Davlik bytecode.
If your gonna sue Google for that, then why not everyone else creating Java-like syntax? C#?
This lawsuit has no grounds. I'm not suprised that Oricles trying it on, as clearly Sun sold them this based on the potential of being able to sue Google. It was all part of the long-term plan to get revenue from Java which makes very little money, and with android around, it's not getting any better.
Alert a moderator
Tell us what you think
You need to Log in or register to post comments