A Chief AI Officer is only as good as their data

According to recent research, nearly half of the FTSE 100 now have a Chief AI Officer (CAIO) – with 42% of those hires happening in just the last year. On paper, this looks like real momentum, as boardrooms recognize the huge transformational potential of artificial intelligence (AI).

With investors asking, employees experimenting, and competitors charging ahead, the pressure to ‘do something with AI’ is everywhere. For many organizations, a new C-suite title feels like a signal of intent.

But leadership titles alone won’t fix underlying data issues – and in most enterprises, their data isn’t yet AI ready. So, the question is: are CAIOs a sign of strategic evolution, or a symptom of something more reactive?

Who owns AI? Balancing responsibilities between CAIOs and CDOs

In many organizations, the CAIO steps into an environment that already includes a Chief Data Officer (CDO). In others, CDOs are simply absorbing the AI remit without additional support or clarity. It may tick a box on the surface, but it doesn’t solve the underlying issue: who’s actually accountable for AI success?

The result is often blurred lines, overlapping mandates, which can potentially lead to internal friction. CAIOs may be tasked with developing an AI strategy to support technology goals, while the CDO manages data governance, but overlapping responsibilities can sometimes lead to differences over resources and accountability, which may slow the progress of their shared initiatives.

What’s needed is more than simply another title. It’s clarity. AI initiatives are far more likely to succeed when there’s clear ownership of the data lifecycle – from ingestion and governance through to analytics and deployment. Without that end-to-end view, AI projects become fragmented and fail to scale.

AI ambition meets data reality

While boards chase cutting-edge AI strategies, their IT teams are often stuck managing fragmented and outdated data – and legacy systems that weren’t built for AI. IT teams are dealing with dozens of disconnected sources, each with its own structure, format, and security posture. This disconnect between business goals and execution makes it difficult to translate strategy into implementation at scale.

The situation is intensified by relentless data growth, increasingly complex regulatory demands, and hybrid environments spanning both cloud and on-premises infrastructure.

Traditionally, organizations have turned to point solutions to manage scale and compliance. While these tools can accelerate specific use cases and give the impression of faster time to value, they often introduce their own set of complications. Integration challenges, fragmented workflows, and the need for specialized training can all erode long-term ROI – resulting in long-term complexity. This is effectively imposing a ‘data integration tax’ on organizations, at a time when they want to accelerate AI investment.

Many organizations underestimate just how foundational the data layer is. AI requires full visibility into where data lives, how it flows, who has access, and how it’s governed – wherever it resides – whether on-prem, in the cloud, or at the edge. You can’t trust your AI output if you don’t trust your data input.

This is why unified data management platforms are so critical. Without a consistent approach to control, access, and lifecycle management, AI models are not being built on a strong enough foundation. This gap between vision and reality is exactly where a CAIO should be equipped to translate complex technical potential into practical solutions.

CAIOs don’t have to be deep technologists – but they must be translators

Another misconception in the CAIO role is that you need an advanced technical background, like a PhD in machine learning, to do the job. In reality, many of today’s effective AI leaders come from business or operational backgrounds. They understand how to align AI strategy with business outcomes – and just as importantly, how to communicate that strategy to the board.

The real value of the CAIO isn’t just technical – it’s also translational. The best one's act as a bridge between data science teams and the wider organization, making sure that AI initiatives are solving real business problems. They know how to ask the right questions, interpret what’s possible, and lead cross-functional teams to deliver impact.

Of course, technical literacy is integral. But it’s the ability to integrate this with business outcomes and communicate cross functionally across the business that sets a great CAIO apart.

Before businesses hire, they need to ask if they’re ready

There’s no question that CAIOs can add enormous value. But only if the foundations are in place. If the data is fragmented, governance controls are poor, and internal ownership is unclear, even the most visionary AI leader will struggle to deliver results.

That’s why forward-thinking organizations need to ask themselves questions before rushing to hire. Do we have full visibility across our data lifecycle? Are we applying governance and security consistently, no matter where our data lives? Is our architecture flexible enough to support AI at scale? And critically, do we have the cultural and operational readiness to embed AI in a way that actually delivers value?

In this context, it's not about rushing to appoint someone just to show momentum. It’s about ensuring they have the structure, support, and systems in place to actually make a difference. At the end of the day, it’s not the title that will define a company's AI success – it’s the trust they have in their data.

We've featured the best AI chatbot for business.

This article was produced as part of TechRadarPro's Expert Insights channel where we feature the best and brightest minds in the technology industry today. The views expressed here are those of the author and are not necessarily those of TechRadarPro or Future plc. If you are interested in contributing find out more here: https://www.techradar.com/news/submit-your-story-to-techradar-pro