Scraping public data is legal, the U.S. Ninth Circuit of Appeals has ruled in a potentially landmark decision.
The decision follows a ruling by a federal court of appeals that reaffirmed its earlier decision, notably that web scraping (data harvesting, en masse) of data that’s made available to the general public, does not violate the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA).
The CFAA is used to determine what can be described as “hacking” under US law.
Share your thoughts on Cybersecurity and get a free copy of the Hacker's Manual 2022 (opens in new tab). Help us find how businesses are preparing for the post-Covid world and the implications of these activities on their cybersecurity plans. Enter your email at the end of this survey (opens in new tab) to get the bookazine, worth $10.99/£10.99.
hiQ Labs vs LinkedIn - round two
The ruling is the epilogue of a legal battle between LinkedIn and hiQ Labs, a talent management algorithm focused on people analytics and data science machine learning. The latter has been scraping LinkedIn user profiles, something the world’s largest social network for professionals described as against its terms of service, equal to hacking, and was in violation of the CFAA.
LinkedIn lost the first lawsuit in 2019, but even after the second knockdown, it doesn’t want to give up.
“We’re disappointed in the court’s decision. This is a preliminary ruling and the case is far from over,” said LinkedIn spokesperson Greg Snapper in a statement.
“We will continue to fight to protect our members’ ability to control the information they make available on LinkedIn. When your data is taken without permission and used in ways you haven’t agreed to, that’s not okay. On LinkedIn, our members trust us with their information, which is why we prohibit unauthorized scraping on our platform.”
> A massive industry you've never heard of is destroying your favorite websites (opens in new tab)
> Millions of LinkedIn users exposed in yet another massive data scrape (opens in new tab)
> LinkedIn given another chance to stop data scraping (opens in new tab)
Reporting on the news, TechCrunch gives it a positive spin, saying the ruling is “good news for archivists, academics, researchers, and journalists”.
“Without a ruling in place, long-running projects to archive websites no longer online and using publicly accessible data for academic and research studies have been left in legal limbo,” it says.
However, it also reminds that some companies’ use of web scraping, such as the one done by facial recognition startup Clearview AI, is borderline illegal. This company scrapped “billions of social media profile photos,” over the years.
Via: TechCrunch (opens in new tab)