Why you can trust TechRadar We spend hours testing every product or service we review, so you can be sure you’re buying the best. Find out more about how we test.
Benchmarks CPU rendering performance
Cinebench R11.5: Index. Higher is better
Sapphire Pure Platinum H67: 6.68
Zotac H67-ITX Wi-Fi: 6.62
Cinebench R10: Seconds. Quicker is Better
Sapphire Pure Platinum H67: 38
Zotac H67-ITX Wi-Fi: 39
CPU video encoding performance
X264v2: fps. Higher is better
Zotac H67-ITX Wi-Fi: 35.02
Sapphire Pure Platinum H67: 34.98
X264v3: fps. Higher is better
Zotac H67-ITX Wi-Fi: 34.85
Sapphire Pure Platinum H67: 34.67
Discrete graphics 1080P gaming performance
DiRT 2: fps - Higher is better
Sapphire Pure Platinum H67: 92
Zotac H67-ITX Wi-Fi: 80
CPU graphics 1080P gaming performance
DiRT 2: fps - Higher is better
Sapphire Pure Platinum H67: 23
Zotac H67-ITX Wi-Fi: 19
As you might expect with two ITX motherboards using Intel's H67 chipset, there's hardly anything to choose between Zotac's H67-ITX Wi-Fi and the Sapphire Pure Platinum H67. But what they both show is just how much more powerful today's ITX board is, compared to any other previous incarnation of the format.
Compared with the last Sapphire ITX motherboard we reviewed, the AMD Fusion-based Pure Fusion Mini E350, the Pure Platinum H67 is light years away in performance terms. This is thanks to its Intel LGA1155 i7/i5/i3 CPU support and the H67 chipset itself.
The Fusion board is close in concept, but still the weak Brazos APU doesn't have anywhere near the processing grunt of the full-powered Intel chip. That said, it's not really in the same ballpark in terms of price or power consumption.
Amazon Prime Video's disappearing act could point to a future without the service
Tesla Cybertruck suffers new recall for a very scary problem
'The party is over for developers looking for AI freebies' — Google terminates Gemini API free access within months amidst rumors that it could charge for AI search queries
