Updated 2 hours ago

Intel X25-V 40GB SSD review

Can Intel's second generation SSD steal the performance crown?

Our Score 3.5

Last reviewed: 2010-07-30July 30th 2010

intel-x25-v-40gb-ssd

The value of this drive doesn't quite add up, but it still performs well for a sub 50GB drive

Fancy Intel's second generation X25-V SSD tech at a third the price of its flagship 160GB? Yes please.

After all, Intel's current controller chipset technology is one of the few proven to maintain decent performance over time. In fact, our test X25-V drive has been knocking about PCF towers for some time.

But, courtesy of support for the Windows 7 TRIM command, not to mention a quick buff-and-format treatment prior to testing, it's not far off box-fresh performance. It still churns through the sequential read test at nearly 200MB/s, for instance.

Likewise, the 4k random read and write numbers are impressive for a budget drive, which bodes well for real-world workloads. Sequential write performance of less than 50MB/s is less competitive, but with fewer channels than a full-fat Intel drive, raw write throughput has never been the X25-V's strong point.

Value for money

No, the real problem for Intel's value-orientated 40GB drive is, well, value. It may be less than a third the cost of the 160GB Intel X25-M, but it's also much less than one-third the capacity when formatted.

What's more, despite the promising synthetic performance results, it's a bit of stinker in our application tests. It's the second slowest drive in both our file decompression and software installation benchmarks.

When you factor in everything including performance, price and capacity, our all-round index places it second from last. That doesn't quite tally with our experience of the X25-V, but it's hard to ignore such poor results.

It's actually our favourite of the sub-50GB drives. Still, Intel's third generation SSDs can't come too soon.

Follow TechRadar Reviews on Twitter: http://twitter.com/techradarreview

Your comments (1) Click to add a new comment

danwat1234


October 31st 2010

1. Well, the Sandforce 2000 chip will give the G3 a beating.

G3:

Sequential Read: 250MB/s

Sequential Write:170MB/s

read IOPS: 50K

write IOPS:40K

Security: AES-128

Sandforce 2000:

Sequential Read: 500MB/s

Sequential Write:500MB/s

read IOPS: 60K

write IOPS:60K

Security: AES-256

Source: http://www.anandtech.com/show/3971/sandforce-announces-nextgen-ssd-controller-sf2000-capable-of-500mbs-and-60k-iops

Alert a moderator

Tell us what you think

You need to Log in or register to post comments

By submitting this form you agree to our Terms of Use and so are legally responsible for anything you submit. DO NOT submit anything which may violate the Terms of Use or another person's rights including copyrighted or offensive materials.

Shopping results for

X25-V 40GB

Intel X25-V 40GB SSD

On sale for

£139.99

from dixons.co.uk

Product Summary

For

>

Proven controller technology

>

Excellent 4k random performance

Against

>

Mediocre real-world performance

>

Limited capacity

Windows 8 offers options on lock screens and more, but loses the familiar Start menu

Hands on: Windows 8 review

Up close with the developer preview of Microsoft's new OS

Belkin's Wireless USB unit has long been discontinued

Whatever happened to Wireless USB & HDMI?

The Ultra Wideband tech we're still waiting for

We have benchmarked all the lastest components so you don't have to

The best PC upgrades for gamers

Top graphics cards, processors and more

Recommended for you

There are fast cards, and there are slow cards - which one is right for you?

15 best graphics cards in the world today

AMD or Nvidia? Choose the best DX11 graphics card for you