Viewsonic VX2433WM review

Viewsonic offers an affordable 24" monitor but as always, there's a catch

Viewsonic VX2433WM
Props to Viewsonic for including an option for setting the level of pixel overdrive

TechRadar Verdict

Iffy build and mediocre image quality. But a lot of screen for the cash

Pros

  • +

    It's big

  • +

    It's cheap

  • +

    It's got lots of features

Cons

  • -

    But it's a bit mediocre

Why you can trust TechRadar We spend hours testing every product or service we review, so you can be sure you’re buying the best. Find out more about how we test.

There was a time back in the mid noughties when Viewsonic had an enviable reputation for producing some seriously sexy, slim-bezel monitors. Today, the Taiwanese outfit has its sights firmly set on the value end of the market with the release of the VX2433WM 24-inch monitor.

On the upside, that means you can bag this generously proportioned 24-inch widescreen puppy for a truly bargainous £175. On the downside, that price does come at a cost, if you catch our drift.

For starters, the build quality is pretty low rent all round. The base of the stand is particularly ghastly, hewn from cheap and hollow plastic and well into cat-flap-in-a-tornado territory in terms of lacking reassuring robustness.

Still, at least it offers a comprehensive feature set. It's well specified in terms of inputs with HDMI, DVI and VGA interfaces. Likewise, it has all the usual image enhancement features that you would expect to see, including dynamic contrast and also a few that don't.

The most obvious example of the latter is the triple-level toggle for response enhancing overdrive technology.

As we've explained in PCF's passim, overdrive technology works by sending an increased voltage through a given pixel. That in turn gives the liquid crystals a kick up the knackers and accelerates the pixel towards the new colour state more rapidly. In theory, that means faster response and less blur issues.

Overdriven LCD panels certainly have noticeably sharper, zippier image quality when displaying movement.

Pixel poor

However, close inspection of some overdriven monitors reveals a visual artefact known as inverse ghosting. It typically involves a trail or shadow that appears in the wake of a moving object in approximately the opposite colour to that object, hence the term 'inverse'.

Anyway, getting back to the VX2433WM, the bad news is that it does suffer from inverse ghosting when the response is set to Ultra Fast. And the good news is that you can get rid of the ghosting by knocking the setting back to standard mode.

The choice, therefore, is really yours; either a slightly nippier responses or artefact-free, but slightly blurrier fragging.

Elsewhere, the Viewsonic puts in a pretty mixed performance. The measured maximum brightness clocks in at just 174 nits. That's well, well down on Viewsonic's official claim of 300 nits.

However, the screen's static contrast result of 874-to-one is a very solid result and certainly close enough to the officially quoted 1,000-to-one figure to avoid any embarrassment. Even better, that measured contrast performance translates in practice into satisfyingly deep black levels.

Make no mistake, you don't get the sort of rich inkiness that the best PVA panels deliver. But this is about as good as it gets with TN technology currently. There's certainly plenty of detail in dark gaming scenes, such as those that pervade Batman: Arkham Asylum, one of our favourite beat 'em ups of the moment.

Overall, then, if it's the wow factor of the largest possible screen you thirst for, the VX2433WM has plenty to recommend it. But be very aware that the impact of the cost cutting on the build quality will be immediately apparent from the moment you debox.

Follow TechRadar Reviews on Twitter: http://twitter.com/techradarreview

Contributor

Technology and cars. Increasingly the twain shall meet. Which is handy, because Jeremy (Twitter) is addicted to both. Long-time tech journalist, former editor of iCar magazine and incumbent car guru for T3 magazine, Jeremy reckons in-car technology is about to go thermonuclear. No, not exploding cars. That would be silly. And dangerous. But rather an explosive period of unprecedented innovation. Enjoy the ride.