Between the security improvements, the new interface and the
major improvements for notebook users Windows Vista looks appealing,
but are you going to feel happy about paying for it? You can add some
of the underlying technology to Windows XP but there's no way to
upgrade to the extra security.
Are the security improvements
enough to switch for or is the rest of Vista enough to make the price
tag - for the upgrade and for any hardware you'll need - feel like good
value?
With so many versions, the answer is a mixed bag. So
let's look at all the different features and versions to see whether
you need to upgrade, whether you want to upgrade and what to pick if
you do.
You only install Vista once on most PCs but the
experience is still critical. Our test installations included upgrading
from Vista RC1 and clean installations on a newly formatted hard disk.
Installing Vista
The
update installation was, as expected, quite slow, and took nearly two
hours. Microsoft spent a lot of the beta process investigating the
update method and held install fests in the US to help track down
upgrade issues. The result is a smoother update experience, with little
in the way of problems.
You will need plenty of disk space
free, as Vista's image-based install copies all the required files to
your hard disk, before rebooting your system to start the installation.
We would still recommend a clean install. For one thing, it's a lot
quicker, and there's no worrying whether some legacy application or
driver may stop your system from operating properly.
One key
test of any new OS is application compatibility. Early versions of
Vista had problems with some applications; but we found everything we
installed on our test machines ran without problems. This included
applications that crashed or failed to run even on Vista release
candidates.
We didn't even have to adjust application
compatibility - though some Internet applications needed to be given
permission to cross Vista's built-in firewall, including Windows Easy
Transfer for copying your files and application settings from another
PC. Driver delays Microsoft has pulled the stops out on getting drivers
certified in time for the final release. However many key drivers are
still in beta, and we're unlikely to see final releases until the
consumer release in January 2007.
Many Tablet PC owners won't
find certified drivers. This is surprising, as Microsoft has made
tablet functions part of the mainstream Vista platform. While most XP
drivers will run under Vista, you'll need to check whether all your
peripherals are compatible. We found most of the hardware in our test
PCs was supported, including wireless networking.
This driver
experience is considerably different from the launch of XP, when many
older pieces of hardware were unsupported on day one. The 32-bit
experience is a lot better than the 64-bit one though. Microsoft
requires the use of signed drivers for any kernel mode, and many
drivers have yet to be released.
Microsoft releasing the RTM code
more than two months before the final consumer release gave them the
time they need to get drivers ready, but early adopters should be
prepared to upgrade drivers as they go.
Vista does take more
advantage of the Microsoft update site than XP, and many drivers that
aren't included on the install DVDs can be downloaded during the
install, or upgraded after your first connection to the Internet. It's
a good idea to keep any machine you're installing or upgrading Vista to
connected to the network, as the installer will go online and download
appropriate drivers from Windows update before starting the
installation.
Vista performance can be increased by taking
advantage of ReadyBoost. This uses a USB 2.0 fl ash drive to act as a
disk cache. However it can't be just any flash drive - Microsoft
requires a certain minimum performance, including a high random access
speed. We found that most USB 2.0 drives we had didn't meet Vista's
requirements.
Don't expect to just plug in a stick and see it
working; you may need to try out several before you find one that
works. Also, the larger the stick, the better the performance gain. We
found that 1GB of fl ash or higher gave the most improvement.
User interface
Microsoft
has used some of the time between the first release candidate and RTM
to polish up "fit and finish". The Aero UI remains the same as before,
though the available screen backdrops are tweaked, with the removal of
some backdrops - leaving you with more scenic views and 'Vistas', but
fewer of the other backdrop classifications.
One of the Aero UI
features, live taskbar thumbnails, is one of the more useful tools.
Roll your mouse over the taskbar and, if you're using Aero Glass,
you'll get a pop-up showing you what's in each window. These are the
same thumbnails used by the new Windows Flip task switcher, and the
slightly pointless (but very pretty) Flip 3D.
Live thumbnails
make it easier to see just what you're doing in each window, and if
anything has changed while you were using another application. A huge
change from XP is the integrated search. XP's desktop search tools were
slow and inefficient. Things are very different with Vista. Taking a
cue from desktop search products such as Google Desktop and Copernic
(or Microsoft's Desktop Search tool), you'll find high speed search
built into all aspects of Vista.
The word wheel search in the
Start menu makes it easier to track down applications, documents,
control panels, IE favourites and email - though not files in the
Pictures or Music folders - by typing a few letters. This finds files
with matching names, keywords and metadata.
Once you get the
hang of searching for applications rather than scrolling through Start
menus you'll stop missing XP's fly-out program groups. Search is also
built into Explorer. Just type a query into the new search box, and
Vista will start a search in the directory you're using. You don't need
to restrict searches manually - Vista will do it automatically.
If
you start a search in Documents, then Vista will only return results
from files and folders below the Documents folder. The same search
tools are built into the control panel and into many of Vista's bundled
applications. Explorer's makeover is finally complete. Windows'
workhorse remains familiar, but with plenty of Vista flair. The icons
are a big improvement over XP, with smooth scaling and a 3D effect that
matches Explorer folders. Even the largest icon looks good on big
screens - ideal for media centre PCs with large LCD panels.
You
can group and stack icons to improve views. Stacked folders are
actually a search query, which can be stored in the Searches folder; a
useful feature Microsoft has buried where only power users will find
it. The revamped Explorer improves navigation, with a breadcrumb bar
that shows you where you are, with options to quickly jump up the
folder hierarchy.
Security and UAC
Vista is touted as
the most secure version of Windows to date. Microsoft has finally
provided a version of Windows that lets you run applications and handle
basic system configuration without always running as Administrator.
It's
not just users that have lower privileges than in Windows XP, some
applications such as Internet Explorer 7 run as limited users, with
little or no ability to make changes to your system or install unwanted
programs. This has led to perhaps the most criticised feature of Vista:
User Account Control (UAC).
Any time you need to do something
that requires administrator privileges - even if you're running as an
administrator - Windows pops up a dialog box that asks for permission
to complete the action. If you're running as a standard user you'll
need to enter an administrator password. In early versions of Vista UAC
was both persistent and a regular visitor, stealing focus from running
applications.
It's still there in the final version, but now
it's a lot less intrusive. Instead of stealing focus, UAC calls for
attention in the task bar, letting you finish what you're doing first.
Once you've finished configuring a PC and installing software you'll
hardly see the UAC dialog at all, and it shouldn't be part of your
day-to-day Vista experience.
Microsoft makes it clear when
you're going to see a UAC dialog: look for a little shield on an icon
or in a menu. Hardware choices Vista's performance is nothing to
complain about; it's mostly similar to Windows XP on the same hardware.
You'll want more than the 512MB that XP requires to operate
smoothly; with 1GB of RAM Vista is speedy and responsive, and if you
plug in a flashdrives that is fast enough to use for ReadyBoost you'll
notice extra speed - and a little extra battery life on portables. And
with Windows Defender watching for spyware and taking care of automatic
disk defragmentation, you shouldn't find performance degrading
substantially over time.
Once you get used to integrated search
in the Start menu, you may fi nd you gain some speed by getting to what
you want faster too. Apart from memory and a reasonably modern
processor - a PC you've bought in the last three years will have no
problems - what really matters is your graphics card, because that
determines whether you can run all the Aero features such as
transparency with Glass, Flip 3D and live taskbar thumbnails.
Even
some integrated graphics can run Aero, depending on the memory and
DirectX 9 support; you need either 128MB of graphics memory or shared
memory and 1GB of PC memory. Nvidia has written a driver that allows
some graphics cards to switch to shared memory to support Aero, which
means more laptops will give you the full Vista experience.
Startup
speed is dependent on your system and connected devices; dropping the
graphical boot screen saves a few seconds but we'll need to wait for
devices with Vista logos to see if Microsoft can push hardware
manufacturers to deliver faster boot times.
But as Vista runs
well on many existing systems, that's where we recommend you use it to
start with. Buying a new PC is one way to get Vista; you'll get either
a voucher for a free or cheap upgrade, or Vista preinstalled with most
new systems. But unless you were planning on a new system, or your kit
won't cope with Vista even if you add a gigabyte of memory and a new
graphics card, we wouldn't suggest buying a new PC just to get Vista.
Wait
for six months to a year for hardware that makes the most of Vista such
as hybrid hard drives, notebooks with integrated flash ReadyBoost cache
and Sideshow-enabled devices such as keyboards and Media Center remote
controls. That way you'll also get a quad core CPU in a desktop and
802.11n on a laptop.
If you can run Vista on your PC, Home
Premium is a bargain. Yes, you can get versions of many features from
utilities, Internet Explorer 7 and .NET 3, but that doesn't give you
the security and networking updates, new UI and integrated search,
ReadyBoost, bundled apps such as Photo Gallery, the Mobility and Sync
centres - or the experience. Windows XP does what you need, but Vista
does more of what you want.
This is the version you want unless you need to connect to your office network from home or your hobbies include web development; it's got the entertainment and mobility features. It supports up to 16GB of RAM, which is enough for most of us. This is the right price for Vista; shame it doesnt have all the features.
Simon Bisson and Mary Branscombe
How does Vista Media Center fare?
Just
as the Tablet PC features run on any PC, Media Center is no longer
restricted to PCs designed for TV watching from the start; it's in the
Ultimate and Home Premium editions and it will run on any PC, whether
or not you have a TV tuner.
The interface is still blue and
still designed to work with a remote control, but subtle changes make
it easier to navigate, with fewer sub-menus to tackle. The control
strip that lets you change channel, set the volume and play, pause or
rewind quickly if you're using a mouse moves to the bottom right.
There's more room for this because the options for each function spread
out sideways, fitting on to a widescreen TV or laptop very well.
Instead
of just text, there are icons and thumbnail images so you can spot
which DVD, recorded programme, album or photo you're after. Hover over
one of these thumbnails and you get details at the bottom of the
screen, such as how many tracks are on an album. The back button now
does a better job of skipping back to where you were without going
through the whole menu. Features such as basic editing options for
images - rotating and cropping or removing red eye to tidy up a slide
show - are a level further up in the interface and are now easier to
find.
Altogether, it proves to be a simple and intuitive
interface for browsing media and watching or recording TV. However
Media Center is one of the most demanding features of Vista, especially
when you start recording and playing video. A PC that can run Vista
happily may struggle with the serious video processing involved, even
if it ran Windows Media Center Edition 2005 without problems.
Adding
a large number of songs or pictures is far faster than in previous
versions and searching for a track gives almost instant results even
with hundreds or thousands of tracks. You can also browse through music
and images using tags you've applied in Windows Photo Gallery or Media
Player.