Updated 17 hours ago

12814 products + 13869 members

Airborne anti-missile laser passes flight test

Chances for North Korea, Iran, Canada to nuke the US fading fast

August 13th | Tell us what you think [ 1 comments ]

this-is-not-the-airborne-laser-if-we-showed-you-the-airborne-laser-we-d-have-to-ask-you-very-nicely-not-to-talk-about-to-the-russians-or-shoot-you-

This is not the Airborne Laser. If we showed you the Airborne Laser, we'd have to ask you very nicely not to talk about to the Russians. Or shoot you.

<>

Think of it as Star Wars: The Next Generation.

Lockheed Martin announced today that its Beam Control/Fire Control system for the US military's Airborne Laser (ABL) has successfully tracked, targeted and engaged a simulated nuclear missile.

Mounted on a modified Boeing 747-400, the megawatt-class laser was trained on a test missile during its boosting phase - the best time to knock an ICBM out of the sky.

In a flight test on Monday, Lockheed Martin's Beam Control/Fire Control system aimed a low-power laser beam in conjunction with the ABL's Battle Management System, which has now demonstrated "the full functionality" of the powerful chemical oxygen-iodine death ray.

Shooting star

The Beam Control/Fire Control System locates and tracks the target, determines the range, compensates for atmospheric turbulence and focuses and directs the High Energy Laser beam. The High Energy Laser beam passes through the system's optical path before exiting through the window on the nose of the aircraft on its way to the target. It has a range of 185 to 375 miles, depending on how tough its target is, and could theoretically also be used against aircraft, satellites and X-wing fighters.

The next step to unleashing killer lasers on our skies will be full power 'shoot-down' tests, culminating in an airborne intercept test against an unarmed, boosting ballistic missile target later this year

The Pentagon has long wanted to add a death ray to its arsenal. Following abortive attempts to get its Strategic Defence Initiative off the ground in the 1980s, the agency was renamed to Ballistic Missile Defence Organisation under Bill Clinton and then renamed again to the Missile Defence Agency in 2002.

Cost and time over-runs have plagued the ABL, which was originally intended to deploy in 2008. Defence Secretary Gates has cited "significant affordability and technology problems" and called the ABL's entire operational role "questionable".The earliest date the ABL could deploy now is 2013.

Comment on this article
 

Your comments (1) Click to add a new comment

watcherzero


August 14th

1. They are too scared of a full power test, the odds are the lens will melt. This weapon is only useful against tragets moving at high mach speeds because on its own it doesnt do much damage, merley weakens the targets structural integrity and lests the stresses of mach speed destroy the target.

Alert a moderator

Tell us what you think

You need to Log in or register to post comments

By submitting this form you agree to our Terms of Use and so are legally responsible for anything you submit. DO NOT submit anything which may violate the Terms of Use or another person's rights including copyrighted or offensive materials.