Updated 45 minutes ago

BBC defends HD service against criticism over quality

Majority of viewers are happy, says corporation

December 16th 2009 | Tell us what you think [ 4 comments ]

bbc-hd

HD programming does not all have a consistent "look", says beeb

Despite complaints from viewers, the BBC has defended the broadcast quality of the BBC HD channel.

The corporation has revealed that viewers have been complaining about the HD service since a change in the way the pictures are encoded took place in August.

Writing on the BBC's Internet blog, head of BBC HD Danielle Nagler, says that despite investigation into the problems, no technical fault can be found, adding that "the majority of viewers watching in normal situations in their living rooms are happy with the picture quality on the channel has shown that as a group, they are."

But many comments on the blog disagree with Nagler's views, talking of "fuzzy and grainy images" and one even saying "even my wife can see a reduction in picture quality and she's got cataracts."

Defending BBC HD

Defending the service, Nagler said "our BBC HD service is optimised to deliver to typical viewing set ups - it is not designed to be perfect at very close quarters, or on a 90-inch projection screen for example.

"There are programmes which some feel look disappointing, and others which are generally felt to look great. There have been no changes to the bitrate (of 9.7Mbps) over this period."

However, the BBC changed the encoders to process its HD images in August from 16Mbps encoding and that's where the issue lies.

"We did extensive testing on the new encoders which showed that they could produce pictures at the same or even better quality than the old encoders at the higher bitrate," a BBC HD spokesperson told BBC News.

"Some concerns"

However, Nagler does admit there have been some issues with this: "As we have indicated, there are some concerns that we have about picture handling in very specific circumstances by the new encoders. These are being addressed and will be fixed through software releases over the coming weeks."

Nagler does say she does want to "lay some myths to rest" over this issue, saying "these are actions that we would have taken in any case…the reduction in bitrate is not specifically related to Freeview HD - and to us it is absolutely critical that HD in general, and the BBC's HD service in particular, is available to everyone in the UK who wishes to watch it, whether that is through a subscription or a non-subscription route, or indeed on demand through BBC iPlayer.

Nagler also goes on to say that just like SD, HD programming does not all have a consistent "look". "HD from the BBC does deliver in a range of styles - and that is not always the bright, crisp look which for some is synonymous with HD."

"There are a number of programmes that we make where that kind of appearance would feel very odd indeed. Different types of cameras used in different ways, with different techniques in post production, will deliver different outcomes.

"The challenge for those of us overseeing that progression is to take a view on the outcome of those experiments, to embrace those that deliver advances and to kill off those that don't."

Nagler also denied the corporation would launch BBC One HD on Freeview early in 2010.

Comment on this article
 

Your comments (4) Click to add a new comment

dansus


December 19th 2009

4. You cannot reduce bitrate by 40% and expect it look the same, i should know, i wrote the damn code.

Wouldnt mind if they just told us that they cant afford the bandwidth and have to reduce costs.

Alert a moderator

jjcouple


December 16th 2009

3. I have less problems with the picture quality,my gripe is sound .When they first started showing friday night with Jonathan Ross it was in 5.1 ,but when i watch it now it goes to stereo,maybe they don`t think its werth it but i thought that was the second selling piont of hd the sound. Also what about the grand prix selling piont well missed

Alert a moderator

jmace86


December 16th 2009

2. I have never had a problem with the picture quality, I just wish that the BBC would have all of their programming in HD.

Alert a moderator

madjedi


December 16th 2009

1. Havn't noticed any difference, but how about having much more of the BBC1 and 2 shedules in HD. Especialy Spooks which is crying out for HD in my opinion!

Alert a moderator

Tell us what you think

You need to Log in or register to post comments

By submitting this form you agree to our Terms of Use and so are legally responsible for anything you submit. DO NOT submit anything which may violate the Terms of Use or another person's rights including copyrighted or offensive materials.

LG's 55-inch EM9600 OLED TV will be sold during 2012

OLED TV: what you need to know

OLED TV prices, manufacturers and more

Choose the best TV for you!

Best TV 2012: what TV should you buy this year?

Best LCD TVs and plasma TVs reviewed

The Toshiba 55ZL2 is the first 4K consumer TV announced. It uses the extra resolution to create glasses-free 3D

4K TV resolution: what you need to know

What is 4K, why is it significant and when can you get it?

Which is the best 32-inch LCD TV?

10 best 32-inch LCD TVs in the world today

Let us help you choose the best 32-inch LCD TV