Updated 42 minutes ago

12834 products + 14003 members

Mac OS X Snow Leopard 10.6 - the story so far

As Macworld Expo gears up, we preview Apple's next OS

January 5th | Tell us what you think [ 9 comments ]

apple-snow-leopard

Head over to www.apple.com/macosx/snowleopard for more on Apple's new OS

<>

Updated: Now read our full Snow Leopard review.

What an incredible launch. Packed with over 300 new features, Apple's OS X 10.5 Leopard sold more than two million copies in its first weekend on sale.

Steve Jobs was bullish. "Leopard's innovative features are getting great reviews and making more people than ever think about switching to the Mac," he said.

But the undoubted success of Leopard caused a problem of its own. How do you top it?

With OS X 10.5 so well received, how can you go one better with 10.6? The solution is as simple as it is surprising. You don't try…

The next big cat

At the Worldwide Developers Conference in June 2008, Jobs announced the follow-up to Leopard. Dubbed OS X 10.6 Snow Leopard, the new operating system, which is expected in the second half of 2009, offers improved speed and performance rather than adding anything new.

"We've delivered more than a thousand new features to OS X in just seven years, and Snow Leopard lays the foundation for thousands more," explained Bertrand Serlet, Apple's Senior Vice President of Software Engineering. "In our continued effort to deliver the best user experience, we hit the pause button on new features to focus on perfecting the world's most advanced operating system."

Despite the odd gripe, reaction to this move has been overwhelmingly positive. Daniel Jalkut, owner of Red Sweater Software and a former Apple engineer, says "I think it's a great idea to focus on stability over features, and doing so is probably indicative of Apple's feeling that it has reached a comfortable point in the development of OS X.

For the first few years, the OS was in many ways catching up with what Mac OS 9 offered users." Kevin Ford of Mac telephony specialist Parliant agrees. "I don't feel wanting for anything in the existing OS. I'm happy to have no new features if it means better stability."

So what does that mean in real-world terms? In a nutshell, what will Snow Leopard do for Mac users? Inevitably, Apple isn't telling. "We don't comment on future products," insists Apple Europe's Director of Corporate Communications Alan Hely.

Yet equally inevitably, with leaks from Apple insiders, comments from developers who have seen early versions and deductions from astute Apple watchers, we can gain an interesting insight into what we can expect next summer. So, let's take an early look at Snow Leopard.

Faster installation

Early reports say installation times are drastically improved. According to Mac review site TestMac.net, "Right off the bat, [Snow Leopard is] fast. Very fast. A clean installation took about 13 minutes from start to finish, which is a world of difference from the hour or so a clean 10.5 Leopard install takes."

This is, to a large extent, due to a significant reduction in the size of the operating system and its core applications. In short, Snow Leopard boasts a much smaller footprint than its predecessor. The figures speak for themselves.

Mail is down to 91MB in size, whereas before it was 287MB. QuickTime is now 8MB instead of 29MB, TextEdit has been reduced from 22MB to 2MB and the Mac OS X Utility folder has dropped from 468MB to 111.6MB. Similar size reductions are reported in other OS X applications too.

 

Your comments (9) Click to add a new comment

paul


January 6th

9. Apologies for the error. The sentence has been removed from the main text of the article.

Paul, Editor, TechRadar

Alert a moderator

haralds


January 6th

8. As previously pointed out, both Carbon and Cocoa run on both PPC and Intel (but not 68K ;-) 0.

Carbon continues to run on 32 bit mode.

As indicated in other places, application slimming can be accomplished by:

- code stripping to remove unused processor code segements

- stripping of unneeded language resources

- compression already supported in HFS+ on a read-only basis

Alert a moderator

humanjhawkins


January 5th

7. Re: I won't be surprised if Apple releases the update as a free upgrade.

Lol. Everyone is saying that the "Carbon vs. PPC" info was silly... I submit that the above statement is far more silly to those who really know Apple.

Alert a moderator

fezzasus


January 5th

6. To clear up the Carbon and Cocoa issue; Carbon allows developers to port applications from OS 9 to OS X with little reworking, It has nothing to do with the processor architecture the computer has.

Alert a moderator

nicolasmerritt


January 5th

5. With regard to the question about cocoa, I'm checking with the author now just to clarify what he meant, and will post a reply here tomorrow.

Regards,

Nick

Editor-in-chief

Alert a moderator

atomicbird


January 5th

4. I just wanted to echo mikeash's comment. The idea that Carbon is intended for PowerPC compatibility, and that Cocoa is not designed for PowerPCs, is so incredibly wrong I almost wonder if it was thrown in to see if anyone was paying attention. Both Carbon and Cocoa run on both PowerPC and Intel Macs.

Alert a moderator

Tell us what you think

You need to Log in or register to post comments

By submitting this form you agree to our Terms of Use and so are legally responsible for anything you submit. DO NOT submit anything which may violate the Terms of Use or another person's rights including copyrighted or offensive materials.