Updated: Now read our full Snow Leopard review.
What an incredible launch. Packed with over 300 new features, Apple's OS X 10.5 Leopard sold more than two million copies in its first weekend on sale.
Steve Jobs was bullish. "Leopard's innovative features are getting great reviews and making more people than ever think about switching to the Mac," he said.
But the undoubted success of Leopard caused a problem of its own. How do you top it?
With OS X 10.5 so well received, how can you go one better with 10.6? The solution is as simple as it is surprising. You don't try…
The next big cat
At the Worldwide Developers Conference in June 2008, Jobs announced the follow-up to Leopard. Dubbed OS X 10.6 Snow Leopard, the new operating system, which is expected in the second half of 2009, offers improved speed and performance rather than adding anything new.
"We've delivered more than a thousand new features to OS X in just seven years, and Snow Leopard lays the foundation for thousands more," explained Bertrand Serlet, Apple's Senior Vice President of Software Engineering. "In our continued effort to deliver the best user experience, we hit the pause button on new features to focus on perfecting the world's most advanced operating system."
Despite the odd gripe, reaction to this move has been overwhelmingly positive. Daniel Jalkut, owner of Red Sweater Software and a former Apple engineer, says "I think it's a great idea to focus on stability over features, and doing so is probably indicative of Apple's feeling that it has reached a comfortable point in the development of OS X.
For the first few years, the OS was in many ways catching up with what Mac OS 9 offered users." Kevin Ford of Mac telephony specialist Parliant agrees. "I don't feel wanting for anything in the existing OS. I'm happy to have no new features if it means better stability."
So what does that mean in real-world terms? In a nutshell, what will Snow Leopard do for Mac users? Inevitably, Apple isn't telling. "We don't comment on future products," insists Apple Europe's Director of Corporate Communications Alan Hely.
Yet equally inevitably, with leaks from Apple insiders, comments from developers who have seen early versions and deductions from astute Apple watchers, we can gain an interesting insight into what we can expect next summer. So, let's take an early look at Snow Leopard.
Faster installation
Early reports say installation times are drastically improved. According to Mac review site TestMac.net, "Right off the bat, [Snow Leopard is] fast. Very fast. A clean installation took about 13 minutes from start to finish, which is a world of difference from the hour or so a clean 10.5 Leopard install takes."
This is, to a large extent, due to a significant reduction in the size of the operating system and its core applications. In short, Snow Leopard boasts a much smaller footprint than its predecessor. The figures speak for themselves.
Mail is down to 91MB in size, whereas before it was 287MB. QuickTime is now 8MB instead of 29MB, TextEdit has been reduced from 22MB to 2MB and the Mac OS X Utility folder has dropped from 468MB to 111.6MB. Similar size reductions are reported in other OS X applications too.
Given the reduction in the operating system's overall footprint, you won't be surprised to hear it enjoys a massive boost in speed. The word from Mac developers who received preview copies at the Worldwide Developers Conference last June is that Snow Leopard looks and feels very much like Leopard, but is noticeably speedier. It boots quicker, opens applications faster and runs more smoothly.
Grand Central
Recognising the recent sea change in processors, with multiple cores rather than clock speed driving overall performance increases, Apple has developed 'Grand Central', a collection of technologies which it claims brings "unrivalled support for multi-core systems to Mac OS X." With Snow Leopard, the entire operating system is optimised for multi-core CPUs.
Apple describes Grand Central as a "parallel programming breakthrough" that "revolutionises the way computers deal with multi-core processors." As Steve Jobs told the New York Times, "The way the processor industry is going is to add more and more cores, but nobody knows how to program those things. Two, yeah. Four, not really. Eight, forget it."
With Grand Central, Snow Leopard breaks this impasse by making it far easier for developers to create third-party applications which take advantage of multiple cores. Reaction from Mac developers has been positive. "It almost makes me wish I had something to compute," quipped Daniel Jalkut. "Maybe I should write something."







Your comments (9) Click to add a new comment
paul
January 6th 2009
9. Apologies for the error. The sentence has been removed from the main text of the article.
Paul, Editor, TechRadar
Alert a moderator
haralds
January 6th 2009
8. As previously pointed out, both Carbon and Cocoa run on both PPC and Intel (but not 68K ;-) 0.
Carbon continues to run on 32 bit mode.
As indicated in other places, application slimming can be accomplished by:
- code stripping to remove unused processor code segements
- stripping of unneeded language resources
- compression already supported in HFS+ on a read-only basis
Alert a moderator
humanjhawkins
January 5th 2009
7. Re: I won't be surprised if Apple releases the update as a free upgrade.
Lol. Everyone is saying that the "Carbon vs. PPC" info was silly... I submit that the above statement is far more silly to those who really know Apple.
Alert a moderator
fezzasus
January 5th 2009
6. To clear up the Carbon and Cocoa issue; Carbon allows developers to port applications from OS 9 to OS X with little reworking, It has nothing to do with the processor architecture the computer has.
Alert a moderator
nicolasmerritt
January 5th 2009
5. With regard to the question about cocoa, I'm checking with the author now just to clarify what he meant, and will post a reply here tomorrow.
Regards,
Nick
Editor-in-chief
Alert a moderator
atomicbird
January 5th 2009
4. I just wanted to echo mikeash's comment. The idea that Carbon is intended for PowerPC compatibility, and that Cocoa is not designed for PowerPCs, is so incredibly wrong I almost wonder if it was thrown in to see if anyone was paying attention. Both Carbon and Cocoa run on both PowerPC and Intel Macs.
Alert a moderator
patgmac
January 5th 2009
3. The "boot from image" feature is going to be great for those of us that need to use test environments. I'll be using it to test new software and to build software packages. This might be ok given the lack of VM options for OS X client.
Patrick
www.macadmincorner.com
Alert a moderator
mikeash
January 5th 2009
2. "While Carbon is designed to offer backwards-compatibility with PowerPC-based Macs, Cocoa most certainly isn't, and so a Finder written in Cocoa just can't be run on a pre-Intel Mac."
This is just a spectacularly clueless thing to say, and a moment's thought should illustrate how wrong it is. Notice how Cocoa apps have been running on PowerPC Macs since Mac OS X was released. Notice how virtually every shipping Cocoa app runs on PowerPC Macs. I really have to wonder where you got this information, and how it managed to get printed without being verified.
Alert a moderator
yathosho
January 5th 2009
1. i'm curious if those slimmed down applications just mean the end of universal binaries. i'd also love to see some of itunes features (namely those handing iphones, apple tv and ipods) to an app of its own (maybe isync). looking forward to snow leopard!
Alert a moderator
Tell us what you think
You need to Log in or register to post comments