Updated 1 hour ago

Why aren't we all watching TV via the web?

In Depth: Long-promised viewing revolution yet to materialise

March 29th 2009 | Tell us what you think [ 5 comments ]

boxee

Boxee is one of the best IPTV programs currently available

The old broadcast format of scheduled programming should be dead by now.

Time-shifting – recording shows onto a storage device to watch whenever you want, rather than when they're broadcast – and Internet Protocol Television (IPTV) were supposed to have been the final headshot for a medium weakened by repeated blows from 'new' forms of entertainment.

Yet far from living in some nu-mediatopia, we're holding on to old habits. Individual channels and shows may struggle to draw the viewing figures they did a decade ago, but Brits are watching more TV than at any time in the last five years. Blame last year's weather if you like, but the bizarre success of Channel 4's Rude Tube – a chart show consisting of 50 wacky and titillating YouTube clips – suggests that the old guard are having a quiet giggle at the expense of those young 'uns who thought the net would take over the media world.

Think about it: a show whose content is based on online popularity – everyone's already seen it – manages to top an evening's viewing figures during the Christmas period and become a water cooler conversation hit. How? Have we failed, as technology evangelists, to fully express how much better life would be if we chose what we wanted to watch, when we wanted to watch it?

We're sure this idea isn't failing to find its feet for lack of content. There's a huge amount of free video online, ranging from Obama's weekly YouTube address to the comprehensive streams of the BBC's iPlayer. Sky regularly updates its online libraries with the best that Fox has to offer and LoveFilm's download section is improving by the day.

What we lack is an application to aggregate all this media, bringing it together into one manageable place on our desktops like a virtual set-top box. But it's not for the want of trying.

Video on demand

The problem is the lack of a single standard for online video. The iPlayer is the gold standard in terms of freedom of integration, exemplified by the large-font web front end designed for Nintendo's Wii, which is outstandingly easy to use on any size of screen.

Meanwhile, the Linux and Mac-based Boxee shows off just how different networks could serve up programs using its format. For example, if you select the BBC icon from the list of available sources, the iPlayer controls take over the central part of the browser, leaving the application running on either side. If only the official offerings could be as simple.

Sky's web-based Sky Player, for example, offers a great range of programmes via a browser based interface. Sky subscribers get most of it for free, and buying or renting shows takes just a click. However, in the course of researching this article, it repeatedly threw up an error code, which a helpline operator told us meant that the PC's DRM layer needed to be updated.

Unable to provide a direct link for downloading the code, the best advice that could be offered was: "Search Live.com for it". Eventually, we found the link using Google, but when that didn't work, the response was: "You may need to do it 10 or 12 times". We could have done, but instead we gave up.

It's a similar – although not quite so horriic – story for Channel 4 On Demand, which has some of the most eclectic programming available legally in the UK, but requires a separate instance of Media Player to run and can't be integrated into other feeds. ITV also offers loads of shows that you can view from its website, but this can be difficult to navigate and it's impossible to access from a third-party aggregator. This closed approach to content means visiting each provider individually – so much for the convenience of digital TV.

The best systems allow for simple embedding. The top of the class – if you're lucky enough to be in the US or behind a proxy server – is Hulu. This serves up content via a simple Flash applet and its range of shows and clips can be added to any website. Unfortunately, the same can't be said of the majority of companies here, due to a reliance on the increasingly anachronistic Windows DRM.

The great leap forward

Similar plans to move things forward with an uber-iPlayer standard for all of the UK terrestrial networks – dubbed Project Kangaroo – recently hit the skids after the Competition Commission vetoed work on it due to complaints from the likes of Virgin Media and Sky. At the moment the project seems to be dead in the water, but it's not impossible that a third party will try the same sort of thing at some point in the future.

 

Your comments (5) Click to add a new comment

gunholio


March 30th 2009

5. TunerFree. It's a vista and win 7 media center front end that screen scrapes all of the content from the BBC, ITV C4 and FIVE. It does HULU too if you have a VPN or proxy.

It's not HD or dvd quality. But I feel it compares to some channels on sky SD.

BBC and Hulu won't work well with extenders (as they use flash) but the other 3 channels work fine.

I got two 2 meter vga cables (about 3 quid at cclonline or 25 at pcworld!!!) and connected to the port on my LCD tv.

It worked so well that my PC is actuall behind my TV now and I bought a wireless keyboard and mouse.

Alert a moderator

lth


March 30th 2009

4. Well, my partner is very happy to be able to sit on the sofa and watch allsorts on the flash iplayer and doesn't really notice the quality dip - for my money, it's only important when you're watching movies or feature TV series (BSG, SCC, etc) - which you can't get on iplayer anyway. We've tried to get 4OD working on a couple of our PCs and never succeeded, getting stuck in a mire of wrong flash versions, registry edits, etc.

Alert a moderator

uncleook


March 30th 2009

3. Totally agree with dodfaefife. In this household we only watch movies on blu-ray and a front projector. We try to watch all TV shows on HD if posisble and we try to watch TV series after the fact on DVD/blu for best image quality and no adverts. Sitting in comfortable chairs watching on decent displays. Quality, not quantity. No room in that equation for squatting in front of a monitor watching low bit rate artefact riddled messes.

Services like iPlayer have their place though and if we can get a portal to them through our TVs and at comparable quality to broadcast then they could become very important indeed.

Alert a moderator

simonaf


March 29th 2009

2. I may be getting long in the tooth, but it's not just about choice. I record any number of programmes that I never watch, because the main reason for watching it is because it's on THEN. I've lost interest the next day, or whenever. The sense of 'occasion' has gone. No amount of choice or technology can replace that.

Alert a moderator

dodfaefife


March 29th 2009

1. Personally, I see the main problem with watching TV online isn't the interface or the software required, it's the quality. We've spent the last few years enjoying increasingly impressive pictures/sound on our large LCD/Plasma screens up to and including HD only to be catapulted back in time to blocky, low res pictures and mono sound for our online experience. Seriously who's going to trade down to that for the sake of VOD? It may be fine for kids or one off viewing if its the only place to see a show but it's just not good enough quality to form part of my viewing schedule.

Alert a moderator

Tell us what you think

You need to Log in or register to post comments

By submitting this form you agree to our Terms of Use and so are legally responsible for anything you submit. DO NOT submit anything which may violate the Terms of Use or another person's rights including copyrighted or offensive materials.