TalkTalk has staged an illustration of exactly why it has described Lord Mandelson's hardline approach to illegal downloaders as naïve.
The ISP has been a major critic of plans to cut off people who download content illegally, and staged a demonstration of one of the key problems.
TalkTalk's Matt Roxburgh identified 23 unsecured WiFi connections on street and downloaded files through them to show that people could find themselves in hot water without actually doing anything wrong.
"The Mandelson scheme is every bit as wrong-headed as it is naive," said Andrew Heaney, TalkTalk's director of strategy and regulation.
"The lack of presumption of innocence and the absence of judicial process combined with the prevalence of wi-fi hacking will result in innocent people being disconnected," he said.
Permission
Permission had been given by the members of the public and the downloads in this case were illegal, but TalkTalk's illustration does highlight a key problem.
Opting for a system where repeat offenders could be cut off without actually doing anything wrong at all – merely having an unprotected Wi-Fi connection – is a recipe for confusion and difficulty.
"We realise it's possible for mistakes to occur or for people to have their wi-fi connection hi-jacked," said the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills, responding to the demonstration.
"So it's important we have an independent and easy route of appeal at all stages in the process."




Your comments (1) Click to add a new comment
rocky
October 17th
1. Just to clarify, there were 23 unsecured AND WEP access points. The majority were WEP.
The downloads were from a "secure" WEP connection that was hacked in a few minutes.
The broadband owner had given permission.
Alert a moderator
Tell us what you think
You need to Log in or register to post comments