As if the notorious anti-piracy lawsuits being wielded like weapons by the music industry weren't bad enough, we now have the same tactic being used by a much darker force – the porn barons.
One of the highest profile cases involves a British couple in their 60s who have been hit with a demand for the odd sum of £503 for allegedly downloading a gay porn film.
No knowledge
The legal action comes from the German copyright holders through London lawyers Davenport Lyons. The Hertfordshire recipients, unsurprisingly, say they have no knowledge of any piracy.
In fact, the anonymous couple told The Guardian: "We were offended by the title of the film. We don't do porn - straight or gay - and we can't do downloads. We have to ask our son even to do an iTunes purchase."
Money maker?
With 25,000 similar demands estimated to have been sent so far, there are fears that the scattergun approach is more about making money than protecting copyright.
Considering that lawyers like Davenport Lyons are seeking £500 for a single alleged offence, it's clear that legal fees make up a disproportionate chunk of the demands.
Who's who?
Moreover, dubious user-identification technology and open wireless networks mean no one can really be sure who's doing the file sharing.
In defence of its cases, Davenport Lyons merely states, "We allow ample opportunity for the recipient to respond, and if they have done nothing wrong they have no reason to be concerned."
Perhaps someone should tell them that old saying about the nature of mud and what happens when it's thrown.
Your comments (4) Click to add a new comment
jonti
November 30th 2008
4. Whatever the rights and wrongs of file sharing it's here to stay. It's now impossible to say without doubt who downloaded what and when. Further, even if they solve the problem of identification it won't be long before someone throws a spanner in the works and again the burden of proof won't be available.
When it comes to porn - I have no objection to others being able to access it but I don't want it where my children can get it nor do I want it in my mailbox everyday.
I'd like to see a few pornographers prosecuted for the many offences they regularly commit in promoting their trade and as for any firm of solicitors who would act for a pornographer in such dubious circumstances, the desire to laugh out loud is tempered by the fact that they must be having a very hard time to have to undertake such work.
Boycot them - put a little morality back into focus.
Jonti
Alert a moderator
jonti
November 30th 2008
3. Whatever the rights and wrongs of file sharing it's here to stay. It's now impossible to say without doubt who downloaded what and when. Further, even if they solve the problem of identification it won't be long before someone throws a spanner in the works and again the burden of proof won't be available.
When it comes to porn - I have no objection to others being able to access it but I don't want it where my children can get it nor do I want it in my mailbox everyday.
I'd like to see a few pornographers prosecuted for the many offences they regularly commit in promoting their trade and as for any firm of solicitors who would act for a pornographer in such dubious circumstances, the desire to laugh out loud is tempered by the fact that they must be having a very hard time to have to undertake such work.
Boycot them - put a little morality back into focus.
Jonti
Alert a moderator
jonti
November 30th 2008
2. Whatever the rights and wrongs of file sharing it's here to stay. It's now impossible to say without doubt who downloaded what and when. Further, even if they solve the problem of identification it won't be long before someone throws a spanner in the works and again the burden of proof won't be available.
When it comes to porn - I have no objection to others being able to access it but I don't want it where my children can get it nor do I want it in my mailbox everyday.
I'd like to see a few pornographers prosecuted for the many offences they regularly commit in promoting their trade and as for any firm of solicitors who would act for a pornographer in such dubious circumstances, the desire to laugh out loud is tempered by the fact that they must be having a very hard time to have to undertake such work.
Boycot them - put a little morality back into focus.
Jonti
Alert a moderator
jonti
November 30th 2008
1. Whatever the rights and wrongs of file sharing it's here to stay. It's now impossible to say without doubt who downloaded what and when. Further, even if they solve the problem of identification it won't be long before someone throws a spanner in the works and again the burden of proof won't be available.
When it comes to porn - I have no objection to others being able to access it but I don't want it where my children can get it nor do I want it in my mailbox everyday.
I'd like to see a few pornographers prosecuted for the many offences they regularly commit in promoting their trade and as for any firm of solicitors who would act for a pornographer in such dubious circumstances, the desire to laugh out loud is tempered by the fact that they must be having a very hard time to have to undertake such work.
Boycot them - put a little morality back into focus.
Jonti
Alert a moderator
Tell us what you think
You need to Log in or register to post comments