Nintendo has responded to concerns that its own in-house software has dominated at the expense of titles from third-party developers by pointing to the success of third-parties in the DS software market.
Earlier this month, Codemasters CEO Rod Cousens told Gamedaily.com of the "challenge" faced by third-party developers, claiming that the market is "clearly dominated by the first party and always has been". Cousens is far from being a lone voice, with other third-party developers expressing disappointment at slower than expected sales of their Wii games.
In its third-quarter statement, which has been translated by Developmag.com, Nintendo appears to address these issues head-on by suggesting that the primary reason their own titles are doing so well is because their in-house development team has enjoyed a considerable head-start over other developers.
"When we develop new hardware at Nintendo, it is done as a collaboration between the hardware development teams and the software development teams. Our software sales percentage is currently high because our internal teams know the Wii's special characteristics better than anyone, and they started development quite a bit before the Wii's release,” the translated report is quoted as saying.
Things can only get better...
Furthermore, Nintendo points to the more mature Dual Screen software market as providing evidence that the company’s in-house head-start does not necessarily mean its grip on software sales will last forever. More specifically, Nintendo has said that 28 of its 50 best-selling DS titles in the third quarter of 2007 were made by third-party developers, as opposed to just two (out of 13) Wii titles.
There’s undoubted logic to what Nintendo is saying – once the developers are more familiar with the Wii they should be capable of producing better games for it. The harsh truth at the moment, however, is that the majority of third-party Wii games simply aren’t very good.
If third-party developers really want to improve their competitive edge, then perhaps they could start by applying a handbrake to the slew of overly simplistic Wiimote-wavers already out there and focus instead on providing games that provide a more rounded, worthwhile and engaging experience.
After all, it’s surely better to have one game that everyone wants to play than half a dozen that nobody looks twice at. Sometimes less really is more.
del.icio.us
Digg
reddit!
Facebook
Stumbleupon
Newsvine
Your comments (1) Click to add a new comment
ron
January 31st
1. When I read how developers complain that the Wii has week specks, and their games don't sell well, it really gets annoying. Bottom Line... If 3rd party developers make good games, people will buy them. When they make horse sh** like chicken shoot, and Spy Games: Elevator Mission, and don't take the time to actually learn to use the development tools they are given, then they shouldn't complain. Nintendo has make some beautiful games like Mario Galaxy, Retro Studios (ALERT!! 3RD PARTY DEVELOPER!!!) has made Metroid Prime 3, EA has done a good job with Madden 08 (even though it's sort of a port). A lot of 3rd party developers suck.. Thats it! The games look rushed a lot of times and they're NOT FUN. Don't blame the paint and canvas, blame the ARTIST!!!!!. Question for develpoers... Am I really SUPPOSE to buy a game that sucks just because you worked hard on it? Make a good game and I'll buy it. Sorry for the rant, but I hate reading developers complaints. No one complained when it was 16 BIT Sega Genesis and Super Nintendo. They used what they had and made good games, and they sold because they were good games. I'll bet the same games won't sell on PS3 or Xbox 360 eather.
Alert a moderator
Tell us what you think
You need to Log in or register to post comments