Updated 1 hour ago

Apple events are now the epitome of dullness

Opinion: Unveiling a shiny nano as 'one more thing' isn't enough

September 10th 2009 | Tell us what you think [ 4 comments ]

i-hope-that-macbook-can-fly-steve

I hope that Macbook can fly, Steve

Matthew Yohe

A truckload of journalists being carted to a tiny room in London means only one thing: something big is going to be announced.

And that's precisely what Apple did at the 'It's only rock and roll' event, but the room full of journos and analysts and countless Apple 'guests' wasn't treated to the presence of Steve Jobs talking through a game changing product - it was a live feed of him showing off the new shinier Apple iPod nano.

Yes, it's got a very important video camera, it's got an FM radio. Yes, Lord Jobs also told us about some tweaks to iTunes and incremental updates to the iPod touch and the Classic. Forgive me if I don't break out the party poppers.

But it's not Jobs' fault!

I've covered countless Apple events over the years, and each time I've defended the company when people ask me why I bother to live blog a presentation from Jobs and nobody else.

I say Apple is the victim of its own success, the sheer desirability of its products is so high that the mere thought of a new one is enough to send the media into a frenzy, and Apple isn't going to stop it.

But the recent 'rock and roll' event has made me realise: Apple isn't passive, it's aggressively milking the media teat, which is all well and good when you release something as game changing as the iPhone.

Don't tell me Apple couldn't quell the hype a little bit by a) not announcing the event miles in advance and b) not simulcast it around the world to locations packed with journalists.

The company that has made an art out of turning a launch of slightly dull products into something that seems exciting is now losing its touch, and that's because it doesn't have any exciting products to launch.

Of course, it makes sense. "Why wouldn't a company take such advantage of free publicity?" you ask. It's a good point, and one countless other brands would kill for. But the problem is Apple is pushing things a little bit too far now.

Not worth the effort

People will start to take a step back and realise that a night spent toiling away at the PC hasn't been worth it to bring news of a small PMP with a slightly useless video camera in it.

Unveil the iTablet - we're excited. Unveil a new LP version of iTunes - we're not. So it makes sense that a leak about a possible large touch device leaks out to change the minds of journalists who had decided not to bother coming.

There will always be those that lap up whatever morsel of new product Apple throws at them. There will always be sites that run previews and follow-ups to Apple events (us included).

But that doesn't mean there won't be some of us that are getting bored of 'one more thing' being a massive, massive anti-climax.

Apple needs to save the razzmatazz, and the wheeling out of Steve Jobs, for the big events, or its events will be simply a room of 15 hardcore fans huddled around a laptop whooping about new colours being added to the iPod touch range.

 

Your comments (4) Click to add a new comment

lovlid


September 11th 2009

4. Talking of fanboys, Where are they?. Any "rumours" about a minor tweak to an ipod, or the iphone getting an irrelevant app, they, and the writers on this site, will talk about it for a week. Apple has a crappy event and all the headline last a day. Embarrassed much???

Alert a moderator

dodfaefife


September 11th 2009

3. Exactly dvs. Apple isn't doing anything that the other tech companies dont with its 'announcement' events. It's just the fanboys squealing like little girls and getting themselves twisted in knots of anticipation every time leads to the inevitable 'letdown' when they don't announce the Apple jetpack-hoverboard twice a year. Take a chill pill guys.

Most companies make constant adjustments to their lines, many of which are minor, it's called 'product differentiation' and it's classic just enough to look like were striving to improve the line when in fact they're just tweaks to a carefully planned product lifecycle from launch to sustained growth to decline before replacing with new ver. I can't believe the grief theses guys get. I for one am just happy they get it right as often as they do.

Apple has a nice habit of telling us what we'll like rather than desperately trying to please every focus group with a constant flood of ill-conceived tat in a desperate attempt to target fickle consumers. Wish more companies had the courage of their convictions.

Alert a moderator

lovlid


September 10th 2009

2. Very important video camera my @rse.

Next year a slightly better camera on the touch. The year after a slightly better camera on the phone. The year after another slightly better camera on a newly shaped/coloured nano.

Its called milking it and making you pay over the odds for it.

Alert a moderator

dvs


September 10th 2009

1. The problem is the annual events happening the same time each year - people start expecting too much. January is for updated computers, June is for iPhone and September is for iPods. Apple can't possible bring something new out exactly a year after the previous outing. If they do, we cheer, if they don't we're disappointed (by our own expectations).

I think there wasn't much they could pull out of the bag iPod wise - they all work and don't really need to be reinvented just for the sake of it (think iPod Nano 3G - the fat one). I think refreshes should just be annouced (like every other company does) and press conferences for new exciting products and not at set yearly intervals.

Alert a moderator

Tell us what you think

You need to Log in or register to post comments

By submitting this form you agree to our Terms of Use and so are legally responsible for anything you submit. DO NOT submit anything which may violate the Terms of Use or another person's rights including copyrighted or offensive materials.